Julien Rioux wrote:
Looking for your comments!
Is it really intended that those citation modules appear in the modules list
(Document Settings Modules)? I guess they should rather be selected by a
dedicated GUI, i.e. in Document Settings Bibliography (and then probably
also do not use the
On 03/02/2012 08:30 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
Looking for your comments!
Is it really intended that those citation modules appear in the modules list
(Document Settings Modules)? I guess they should rather be selected by a
dedicated GUI, i.e. in Document Settings
Richard Heck wrote:
Modules are starting to be used for so many different things, we may
actually want to make other distinctions among them, too. Of course, the
syntax is all the same, so one can mix and match, but it might help as
the number of modules grows to let people select and
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:19:09PM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
Looking for your comments!
I get warnings when loading documents created with old versions.
See attached examples.
--
Enrico
#LyX 1.5.7 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 276
\begin_document
On 02/03/2012 9:49 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 03/02/2012 08:30 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
Looking for your comments!
Is it really intended that those citation modules appear in the
modules list
(Document Settings Modules)? I guess they should rather be selected
by a
On 02/03/2012 11:22 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:19:09PM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
Looking for your comments!
I get warnings when loading documents created with old versions.
See attached examples.
Thanks I will have a look.
Cheers,
Julien
On 03/02/2012 04:54 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
Modules have a #Category in their headers. It doesn't seem to do
anything at the moment, but I suppose this was put in to separate them
in the GUI. I am also ok about using a different extension e.g.
.citation or .engine
Yes, that was the idea,
On 02/03/2012 11:22 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:19:09PM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
Looking for your comments!
I get warnings when loading documents created with old versions.
See attached examples.
I got
Object::disconnect: Unexpected null parameter
but only
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 06:52:07PM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 02/03/2012 11:22 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:19:09PM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
Looking for your comments!
I get warnings when loading documents created with old versions.
See attached examples.
Julien Rioux wrote:
I am also ok about using a different extension e.g.
.citation or .engine
I'm very much in favor of this.
Jürgen
Julien Rioux wrote:
> Looking for your comments!
Is it really intended that those citation modules appear in the modules list
(Document > Settings > Modules)? I guess they should rather be selected by a
dedicated GUI, i.e. in Document > Settings > Bibliography (and then probably
also do not
On 03/02/2012 08:30 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
Looking for your comments!
Is it really intended that those citation modules appear in the modules list
(Document> Settings> Modules)? I guess they should rather be selected by a
dedicated GUI, i.e. in Document> Settings>
Richard Heck wrote:
> Modules are starting to be used for so many different things, we may
> actually want to make other distinctions among them, too. Of course, the
> syntax is all the same, so one can mix and match, but it might help as
> the number of modules grows to let people select and
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:19:09PM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
> Looking for your comments!
I get warnings when loading documents created with old versions.
See attached examples.
--
Enrico
#LyX 1.5.7 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 276
\begin_document
On 02/03/2012 9:49 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 03/02/2012 08:30 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
Looking for your comments!
Is it really intended that those citation modules appear in the
modules list
(Document> Settings> Modules)? I guess they should rather be selected
by a
On 02/03/2012 11:22 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:19:09PM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
Looking for your comments!
I get warnings when loading documents created with old versions.
See attached examples.
Thanks I will have a look.
Cheers,
Julien
On 03/02/2012 04:54 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
Modules have a #Category in their headers. It doesn't seem to do
anything at the moment, but I suppose this was put in to separate them
in the GUI. I am also ok about using a different extension e.g.
.citation or .engine
Yes, that was the idea,
On 02/03/2012 11:22 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:19:09PM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
Looking for your comments!
I get warnings when loading documents created with old versions.
See attached examples.
I got
Object::disconnect: Unexpected null parameter
but only
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 06:52:07PM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
> On 02/03/2012 11:22 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:19:09PM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
> >>Looking for your comments!
> >
> >I get warnings when loading documents created with old versions.
> >See attached
Julien Rioux wrote:
> I am also ok about using a different extension e.g.
> .citation or .engine
I'm very much in favor of this.
Jürgen
On 01/21/2012 09:49 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/10/2012 09:19 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
Looking for your comments!
The approach looks very good to me, though the patch is so
huge---unavoidably so, to be sure---that it's hard to have much to say
about the details.
Can you say a bit about the
On 01/23/2012 08:21 AM, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 01/21/2012 09:49 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/10/2012 09:19 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
Looking for your comments!
The approach looks very good to me, though the patch is so
huge---unavoidably so, to be sure---that it's hard to have much to say
On 01/21/2012 09:49 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/10/2012 09:19 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
Looking for your comments!
The approach looks very good to me, though the patch is so
huge---unavoidably so, to be sure---that it's hard to have much to say
about the details.
Can you say a bit about the
On 01/23/2012 08:21 AM, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 01/21/2012 09:49 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/10/2012 09:19 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
Looking for your comments!
The approach looks very good to me, though the patch is so
huge---unavoidably so, to be sure---that it's hard to have much to say
On 01/10/2012 09:19 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
Looking for your comments!
The approach looks very good to me, though the patch is so
huge---unavoidably so, to be sure---that it's hard to have much to say
about the details.
Can you say a bit about the format of the CiteFormat entries? I take it
On 01/10/2012 09:19 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
Looking for your comments!
The approach looks very good to me, though the patch is so
huge---unavoidably so, to be sure---that it's hard to have much to say
about the details.
Can you say a bit about the format of the CiteFormat entries? I take it
26 matches
Mail list logo
