On 04/02/2012 05:41 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 02/04/12 09:41, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Richard Heck
wrote:
Anyone have a view about what we should call what used to be called
2.0.4svn?
Why do you need one?
To show in the about box. Just so
Le 02/04/12 09:41, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
Anyone have a view about what we should call what used to be called
2.0.4svn?
Why do you need one?
To show in the about box. Just so that people can give a name to the
thing, even though
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> Anyone have a view about what we should call what used to be called
> 2.0.4svn?
Why do you need one?
With git, tags are real tags and not branches as with svn. So I'd
recommend to keep developping in 2.0.x branch and tag i
Le 02/04/12 00:02, Richard Heck a écrit :
Anyone have a view about what we should call what used to be called
2.0.4svn?
2.0.4dev?
JMarc
Anyone have a view about what we should call what used to be called
2.0.4svn?
Richard
