Re: 2.0.4svn...?
Le 02/04/12 00:02, Richard Heck a écrit : Anyone have a view about what we should call what used to be called 2.0.4svn? 2.0.4dev? JMarc
Re: 2.0.4svn...?
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote: Anyone have a view about what we should call what used to be called 2.0.4svn? Why do you need one? With git, tags are real tags and not branches as with svn. So I'd recommend to keep developping in 2.0.x branch and tag it from time to time: tag 2.0.4test1 test it fix it tag 2.0.4test2 test it good to release tag 2.0.4 release the 2.0.4 tarball shall then checkout the 2.0.x branch at tag 2.0.4 Abdel.
Re: 2.0.4svn...?
Le 02/04/12 09:41, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Richard Heckrgh...@comcast.net wrote: Anyone have a view about what we should call what used to be called 2.0.4svn? Why do you need one? To show in the about box. Just so that people can give a name to the thing, even though git lives in an alternate reality where everything could happen in any order (like release 2.0.5 before 2.0.4). JMarc
Re: 2.0.4svn...?
On 04/02/2012 05:41 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 02/04/12 09:41, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Richard Heckrgh...@comcast.net wrote: Anyone have a view about what we should call what used to be called 2.0.4svn? Why do you need one? To show in the about box. Just so that people can give a name to the thing And for bug reports. The dev suffix is good and should probably be used also for 2.0.1svn, though we probably don't want to have to change that now in trac. So I'll switch to 2.0.5dev, for the same reason, when 2.0.4 is released. Richard
Re: 2.0.4svn...?
Le 02/04/12 00:02, Richard Heck a écrit : Anyone have a view about what we should call what used to be called 2.0.4svn? 2.0.4dev? JMarc
Re: 2.0.4svn...?
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Richard Heck <rgh...@comcast.net> wrote: > > Anyone have a view about what we should call what used to be called > 2.0.4svn? Why do you need one? With git, tags are real tags and not branches as with svn. So I'd recommend to keep developping in 2.0.x branch and tag it from time to time: tag 2.0.4test1 test it fix it tag 2.0.4test2 test it good to release tag 2.0.4 release the 2.0.4 tarball shall then checkout the 2.0.x branch at tag 2.0.4 Abdel.
Re: 2.0.4svn...?
Le 02/04/12 09:41, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Richard Heck<rgh...@comcast.net> wrote: Anyone have a view about what we should call what used to be called 2.0.4svn? Why do you need one? To show in the about box. Just so that people can give a name to the thing, even though git lives in an alternate reality where everything could happen in any order (like release 2.0.5 before 2.0.4). JMarc
Re: 2.0.4svn...?
On 04/02/2012 05:41 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 02/04/12 09:41, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Richard Heck<rgh...@comcast.net> wrote: Anyone have a view about what we should call what used to be called 2.0.4svn? Why do you need one? To show in the about box. Just so that people can give a name to the thing And for bug reports. The "dev" suffix is good and should probably be used also for 2.0.1svn, though we probably don't want to have to change that now in trac. So I'll switch to 2.0.5dev, for the same reason, when 2.0.4 is released. Richard
2.0.4svn...?
Anyone have a view about what we should call what used to be called 2.0.4svn? Richard
2.0.4svn...?
Anyone have a view about what we should call what used to be called 2.0.4svn? Richard
