On Saturday, 23. June 2001 19:40, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> But what happen if for one paper you need some partition into bib
> files, and in a different paper you need another partition ?
> Since I don't use multiple bibs I don't know if this is a common
> situation.
Bibunits has the better cards her
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 07:16:01PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> It's a matter of personal taste. Both packages have some advantages and
> some disadvantages. I tried them both and decided to use bibtopic
> finally.
> As you say, the biggest disadvantage with bibtopic is that you have to
>
On Saturday, 23. June 2001 15:21, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> The documentation should be written when a full support is written.
> For 1.2.0, we will probably have only a small paragraph in NEWS.
OK.
> I'm also wondering if bibtopic is the package we want to support.
> The multibib package uses a diff
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 02:45:44PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I think it depends on when this will be implemented. If it will be on
> 1.3. the interim solution with the extraline in the preamble would be
> o.k., if it will be 2.x I would prefer a way where you don't have to
> put extra
On Saturday, 23. June 2001 13:55, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> The no temp-dir problem will happen even if the user do not use
> bibtopic (in this case it is harmless, there are just unnecessary
> runs of bibtex). There number of people that will suffer from this
> problem might be larger than the number
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 01:36:16PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I think Herbert is right. The case that the tmp dir is not used right
> appears seldom compared with the case that bibtopic fails because the
> user doesn't know about the extra line to put in the preamble (this
> will appear
On Saturday, 23. June 2001 10:28, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 07:34:39PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> What do others think ?
I think Herbert is right. The case that the tmp dir is not used right
appears seldom compared with the case that bibtopic fails because the
user doesn't
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 07:34:39PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > > > you don't answered my question why this could happened.
> > > > from my point of view there is no need to choose
> > > > other filenames than the default ones. the old way
> > > > is the
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 07:34:39PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > > you don't answered my question why this could happened.
> > > from my point of view there is no need to choose
> > > other filenames than the default ones. the old way
> > > is the better way.
> >
> > You can have foo.lyx and foo
Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 06:02:43PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > >
> > > Alternatively, you can edit the source file LaTeX.C and change the line
> > >string file2 = ChangeExtension(file, "") + "." + tostr(i)
> > > into
> > >string file2 = Chang
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 06:02:43PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Dekel Tsur wrote:
> >
> > Alternatively, you can edit the source file LaTeX.C and change the line
> >string file2 = ChangeExtension(file, "") + "." + tostr(i)
> > into
> >string file2 = ChangeExtension(file, "") + tostr(i)
>
Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> Alternatively, you can edit the source file LaTeX.C and change the line
>string file2 = ChangeExtension(file, "") + "." + tostr(i)
> into
>string file2 = ChangeExtension(file, "") + tostr(i)
> and then no change in the lyx file is needed.
>
> The reason I choose the
Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 01:22:37PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > I just tested 1.2.0cvs (RPM from Kayvan) which should have finally
> > bibtopic support, as Dekel Tsur told me some times ago
> > (http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg10938.html)
> > U
On Thursday, 21. June 2001 13:42, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> \renewcommand{\thebtauxfile}{\jobname.\arabic{btauxfile}}
Thank you. This works fine :-)
> The reason I choose the former format, is for safety reason - the
> user may have a file called filename2 and this might cause troubles.
A sensible
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 01:22:37PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I just tested 1.2.0cvs (RPM from Kayvan) which should have finally
> bibtopic support, as Dekel Tsur told me some times ago
> (http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg10938.html)
> Unfortunately it doesn't seem t
Dear Developers,
I just tested 1.2.0cvs (RPM from Kayvan) which should have finally
bibtopic support, as Dekel Tsur told me some times ago
(http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg10938.html)
Unfortunately it doesn't seem to work (I still seems to call bibtex
only one time).
One
16 matches
Mail list logo
