On Wednesday 09 May 2007 14:54:20 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What is the point where the format is frozen?
The 1.5.0 release. :-)
I need to know for the
1.4.5 release. Since I have been very lazy at backporting fixes to
1.4.5, I guess the only feature it will sport is reading 1.5 files
José == José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
José Hi all, feedback is welcome for this message.
José The reason for this tight scheduled is that if we are not able
José to fix the really serious bugs in a month we will not solve the
José issues and this only stagnates the development.
José The
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> Hi all, feedback is welcome for this message.
José> The reason for this tight scheduled is that if we are not able
José> to fix the really serious bugs in a month we will not solve the
José> issues and this only stagnates the
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 14:54:20 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What is the point where the format is frozen?
The 1.5.0 release. :-)
> I need to know for the
> 1.4.5 release. Since I have been very lazy at backporting fixes to
> 1.4.5, I guess the only feature it will sport is reading 1.5
After our problems with LyX 1.4.0, we promised on the users list to fix if
possible all regressions to LyX 1.3.x. So we should try to fix them.
-- Regressions to LyX 1.3.x:
should this be keyworded as regression ?
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2945
pavel
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 22:12:18 Pavel Sanda wrote:
After our problems with LyX 1.4.0, we promised on the users list to fix
if possible all regressions to LyX 1.3.x. So we should try to fix them.
-- Regressions to LyX 1.3.x:
should this be keyworded as regression ?
José Matos wrote:
Hi all,
feedback is welcome for this message.
[...]
Thanks to Uwe and Bennet I have compiled this list of bugs. Is there any issue
missing here? Which bugs do you expect to tackle during the release
candidates stage?
I'm still having some stability issues with
> After our problems with LyX 1.4.0, we promised on the users list to fix if
> possible all regressions to LyX 1.3.x. So we should try to fix them.
>
> -- Regressions to LyX 1.3.x:
should this be keyworded as regression ?
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2945
pavel
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 22:12:18 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > After our problems with LyX 1.4.0, we promised on the users list to fix
> > if possible all regressions to LyX 1.3.x. So we should try to fix them.
> >
> > -- Regressions to LyX 1.3.x:
>
> should this be keyworded as regression ?
>
>
José Matos wrote:
Hi all,
feedback is welcome for this message.
[...]
Thanks to Uwe and Bennet I have compiled this list of bugs. Is there any issue
missing here? Which bugs do you expect to tackle during the release
candidates stage?
I'm still having some stability issues with
Hi all,
feedback is welcome for this message.
The reason for this tight scheduled is that if we are not able to fix the
really serious bugs in a month we will not solve the issues and this only
stagnates the development.
The fact that lots of bugs have proposed patches is also an hint
On Sun, 6 May 2007, José Matos wrote:
Hi all,
feedback is welcome for this message.
The reason for this tight scheduled is that if we are not able to fix
the really serious bugs in a month we will not solve the issues and this
only stagnates the development.
Proposed schedule to
11 May - beta 3
Starting from this date and until the stable release all svn commits should
have an associated bugzilla number.
Fine by me.
--- Crash bugs ---
Good news, we only have 5 confirmed crashes left:
Now whe have a new one :-(:
LyX crashes when changing the document language:
On Sunday 06 May 2007 22:56:45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Bo's listing stuff going in? (I'm ambivalent, but just want a
decision)
I did not mention this before because I am still trying to put in
perspective all the different issues involved.
Bo has worked really hard on the details, and
Hi all,
feedback is welcome for this message.
The reason for this tight scheduled is that if we are not able to fix the
really serious bugs in a month we will not solve the issues and this only
stagnates the development.
The fact that lots of bugs have proposed patches is also an hint
On Sun, 6 May 2007, José Matos wrote:
Hi all,
feedback is welcome for this message.
The reason for this tight scheduled is that if we are not able to fix
the really serious bugs in a month we will not solve the issues and this
only stagnates the development.
Proposed schedule to
> 11 May - beta 3
>
> Starting from this date and until the stable release all svn commits should
> have an associated bugzilla number.
Fine by me.
> --- Crash bugs ---
> Good news, we only have 5 confirmed crashes left:
Now whe have a new one :-(:
LyX crashes when changing the document
On Sunday 06 May 2007 22:56:45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is Bo's listing stuff going in? (I'm ambivalent, but just want a
> decision)
I did not mention this before because I am still trying to put in
perspective all the different issues involved.
Bo has worked really hard on the details,
18 matches
Mail list logo
