Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
So shall I commit?
The patch looks reasonable to me.
It might be that this is the sledgehammer, and that there's a more fine
grained solution than updating everything on buffer switch. OTOH I don't know
why we shouldn't do that.
This
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > The patch looks reasonable to me.
>
> It might be that this is the sledgehammer, and that there's a more fine
> grained solution than updating everything on buffer switch. OTOH I don't
> know why we shouldn't do that.
>
> So I guess I'll commit.
done.
Jürgen
Bo Peng wrote:
> > So shall I commit?
>
> The patch looks reasonable to me.
It might be that this is the sledgehammer, and that there's a more fine
grained solution than updating everything on buffer switch. OTOH I don't know
why we shouldn't do that.
So I guess I'll commit. If Abdel comes up w
> So shall I commit?
The patch looks reasonable to me.
Bo
Mael Hilléreau wrote:
> I got this problem with 1.5.0rc2 and 1.5.0 final, but not with Jürgen's
> patch. I just found a way to reproduce (not sure if it works in any case
> however):
>
> 1. Open a multipart document having a child doc small enough so that dark
> grey is visible at bottom;
> 2. Go t
Selon Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sven Schreiber wrote:
> > Actually with 1.5.0 final I cannot reproduce my earlier problems,
> > either. So maybe this has been fixed after rc2.
>
> No, it hasn't. I could reproduce the problems with 1.5.1svn. I couldn't with
> my patch up to now, but
Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Actually with 1.5.0 final I cannot reproduce my earlier problems,
> either. So maybe this has been fixed after rc2.
No, it hasn't. I could reproduce the problems with 1.5.1svn. I couldn't with
my patch up to now, but I don't have a 100% recipe to reproduce the
behaviour,
Jürgen Spitzmüller schrieb:
Sven Schreiber wrote:
I had reported this on the user list already for rc2
(http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg57128.html), but
did not pursue it because Uwe also could not reproduce it. Haven't tried
1.5.0 final yet, but it was for real and I don't th
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 05:40:19PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> > I think I have been very verbose on the multi-view thing.
>
> For this particular feature, the consensus was that we should decide
> whether or not to disable it when 1.5.0 is released. As far as I can
> see, multi-view was so stable at
> I think I have been very verbose on the multi-view thing.
For this particular feature, the consensus was that we should decide
whether or not to disable it when 1.5.0 is released. As far as I can
see, multi-view was so stable at the end of the RC cycle that no one
suggested to disable it.
The o
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 01:57:16PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> > Which reminds me of the recent poll regarding issues of the 1.5
> > development cycle: There were too many people pushing their favourite
> > half-baked feature very late in the process and there have been several
> > Just-because-I-can s
> Which reminds me of the recent poll regarding issues of the 1.5
> development cycle: There were too many people pushing their favourite
> half-baked feature very late in the process and there have been several
> Just-because-I-can style commits that got never reverted.
Everyone knows this and it
Sven Schreiber wrote:
> >> when you create two documents at once LyX 1.5.0. combines the text from
> >> the first window with the text in the second one after you changed it by
> >> clicking on the specific tab. DVI is OK. But the text in the second
> >> window is mixed up with the first one.
> >
>
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 02:01:25AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > Sorry, Pavel. I cannot understand it. I tested it three times,
> > > some hours ago,
> >
> > no problem, this is not the only bug which is difficult to pinpoint
> > and appears only randomly. if you find some way how to reproduce
Pavel Sanda wrote:
(http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg57128.html), but
other tab is still visible (screen is not cleared), except for the first
line which waits for my input. This doesn't change when I start typing,
this reminds me the redrawing problems, where only the curr
> (http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg57128.html), but
>>other tab is still visible (screen is not cleared), except for the first
>>line which waits for my input. This doesn't change when I start typing,
this reminds me the redrawing problems, where only the current paragraph
was v
Pavel Sanda schrieb:
when you create two documents at once LyX 1.5.0. combines the text from the
first window with the text in the second one after you changed it by clicking
on the specific tab. DVI is OK. But the text in the second window is mixed up
with the first one.
i'm not able to repr
Pavel Sanda schrieb:
when you create two documents at once LyX 1.5.0. combines the text from the
first window with the text in the second one after you changed it by clicking
on the specific tab. DVI is OK. But the text in the second window is mixed up
with the first one.
i'm not able to repr
Pavel Sanda schrieb:
when you create two documents at once LyX 1.5.0. combines the text from the
first window with the text in the second one after you changed it by clicking
on the specific tab. DVI is OK. But the text in the second window is mixed up
with the first one.
i'm not able to repr
> On 7/26/07, Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> now - instead normal character there appears VERY big character (even in
> >latex output).
> >> without switching between tabs nothing like this happens.
> >> can anybody reproduce it ?
> >
> >more remarks: it happens also when switching th
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 02:01 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > Sorry, Pavel. I cannot understand it. I tested it three times, some hours
> > > ago,
> >
> > no problem, this is not the only bug which is difficult to pinpoint and
> > appears
> > only randomly. if you find some way how to reproduce i
On 7/26/07, Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> now - instead normal character there appears VERY big character (even in
latex output).
> without switching between tabs nothing like this happens.
> can anybody reproduce it ?
more remarks: it happens also when switching through menu. after
> now - instead normal character there appears VERY big character (even in
> latex output).
> without switching between tabs nothing like this happens.
> can anybody reproduce it ?
more remarks: it happens also when switching through menu. after that switch
font indicator
is set to bold,huger an
> > Sorry, Pavel. I cannot understand it. I tested it three times, some hours
> > ago,
>
> no problem, this is not the only bug which is difficult to pinpoint and
> appears
> only randomly. if you find some way how to reproduce it later post it again :)
bah, experimenting with tabs i came to v
> Sorry, Pavel. I cannot understand it. I tested it three times, some hours
> ago,
no problem, this is not the only bug which is difficult to pinpoint and appears
only randomly. if you find some way how to reproduce it later post it again :)
bye,
pavel
Am Freitag, 27. Juli 2007 00:28 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > when you create two documents at once LyX 1.5.0. combines the text from
> > the first window with the text in the second one after you changed it by
> > clicking on the specific tab. DVI is OK. But the text in the second
> > window is mixed u
> when you create two documents at once LyX 1.5.0. combines the text from the
> first window with the text in the second one after you changed it by clicking
> on the specific tab. DVI is OK. But the text in the second window is mixed up
> with the first one.
i'm not able to reproduce it. can y
Hi,
when you create two documents at once LyX 1.5.0. combines the text from the
first window with the text in the second one after you changed it by clicking
on the specific tab. DVI is OK. But the text in the second window is mixed up
with the first one.
Cheers
Heiko
--
Heiko Schroeder
Prah
28 matches
Mail list logo
