Jerry wrote:
> > Jerry wrote:
> >> With apologies to whoever wrote this description and knowing that I've
> >> sounded a little harsh, maybe it would be a good idea to consider a more
> >> generally appealing description. I suspect that this idea could be applied
> >> in other scenarios to bette
On Nov 13, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jerry wrote:
>> With apologies to whoever wrote this description and knowing that I've
>> sounded a little harsh, maybe it would be a good idea to consider a more
>> generally appealing description. I suspect that this idea could be applied
>>
Jerry wrote:
> With apologies to whoever wrote this description and knowing that I've
> sounded a little harsh, maybe it would be a good idea to consider a more
> generally appealing description. I suspect that this idea could be applied in
> other scenarios to better publicize LyX.
I'm sceptic
The announcement for LyX 2.0.5 appeared today on Macupdate.com. Here is the
description given there:
"LyX is a fully fuctional WYSIWYM (what you see is what you mean) frontend for
LaTeX wnich allows users with no programming knowledge to get the full benefits
of LaTeX. It differs from products
