Stephan Witt wrote:
Now, I have an patch at hand again. I can continue to use and provide a
patched version
for my colleges, of course. But I claim it's useful for others, too.
only misunderstanding, i didn't want to dispute backport. i only wanted to have
documentation even in 1.6 so its
Stephan Witt wrote:
The patch is ready and attached.
I tested all CVS functions and it works here.
The patch is certainly much bigger than what suits me now, and it introduces
new strings.
I would be more comfortable to wait with this until 1.6.8 is out, so it can be
tested a bit.
However,
Am 26.10.2010 um 10:06 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Stephan Witt wrote:
The patch is ready and attached.
I tested all CVS functions and it works here.
The patch is certainly much bigger than what suits me now, and it introduces
new strings.
I would be more comfortable to wait with this
Stephan Witt wrote:
I would be more comfortable to wait with this until 1.6.8 is out, so it
can be tested a bit.
I'm comfortable with waiting after 1.6.8. We're using 1.6.7 for now.
If 1.6.8 is out I can build 1.6.9svn for internal use after the patch is
applied. I'd hope for 1.6.9
Am 26.10.2010 um 18:19 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Stephan Witt wrote:
I would be more comfortable to wait with this until 1.6.8 is out, so it
can be tested a bit.
I'm comfortable with waiting after 1.6.8. We're using 1.6.7 for now.
If 1.6.8 is out I can build 1.6.9svn for internal use
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Now, I have an patch at hand again. I can continue to use and provide a
> patched version
> for my colleges, of course. But I claim it's useful for others, too.
only misunderstanding, i didn't want to dispute backport. i only wanted to have
documentation even in 1.6 so its
Stephan Witt wrote:
> The patch is ready and attached.
> I tested all CVS functions and it works here.
The patch is certainly much bigger than what suits me now, and it introduces
new strings.
I would be more comfortable to wait with this until 1.6.8 is out, so it can be
tested a bit.
Am 26.10.2010 um 10:06 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> The patch is ready and attached.
>> I tested all CVS functions and it works here.
>
> The patch is certainly much bigger than what suits me now, and it introduces
> new strings.
>
> I would be more comfortable to wait
Stephan Witt wrote:
> > I would be more comfortable to wait with this until 1.6.8 is out, so it
> > can be tested a bit.
>
> I'm comfortable with waiting after 1.6.8. We're using 1.6.7 for now.
> If 1.6.8 is out I can build 1.6.9svn for internal use after the patch is
> applied. I'd hope for
Am 26.10.2010 um 18:19 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> I would be more comfortable to wait with this until 1.6.8 is out, so it
>>> can be tested a bit.
>>
>> I'm comfortable with waiting after 1.6.8. We're using 1.6.7 for now.
>> If 1.6.8 is out I can build 1.6.9svn for
Am 25.10.2010 um 16:53 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Stephan Witt wrote:
I'd like to prepare a backport of the CVS backend changes to make it usable
in 1.6.8. The dialog part of the changes I would skip so the other
backends are not modified.
May I do that or is it too late?
If you are
Stephan Witt wrote:
The patch is ready and attached.
I tested all CVS functions and it works here.
looks fine. the documentation of course ;)
pavel
Am 25.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
The patch is ready and attached.
I tested all CVS functions and it works here.
looks fine.
Thanks.
the documentation of course ;)
Sorry, I don't understand you.
You mean after writing the documentation I should backport the
Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 25.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
The patch is ready and attached.
I tested all CVS functions and it works here.
looks fine.
Thanks.
the documentation of course ;)
Sorry, I don't understand you.
You mean after writing the
Am 25.10.2010 um 23:14 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 25.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
The patch is ready and attached.
I tested all CVS functions and it works here.
looks fine.
Thanks.
the documentation of course ;)
Sorry, I don't
Am 25.10.2010 um 16:53 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> I'd like to prepare a backport of the CVS backend changes to make it usable
>> in 1.6.8. The dialog part of the changes I would skip so the other
>> backends are not modified.
>> May I do that or is it too late?
>
> If
Stephan Witt wrote:
> The patch is ready and attached.
> I tested all CVS functions and it works here.
looks fine. the documentation of course ;)
pavel
Am 25.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> The patch is ready and attached.
>> I tested all CVS functions and it works here.
>
> looks fine.
Thanks.
> the documentation of course ;)
Sorry, I don't understand you.
You mean after writing the documentation I should
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 25.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
> > Stephan Witt wrote:
> >> The patch is ready and attached.
> >> I tested all CVS functions and it works here.
> >
> > looks fine.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > the documentation of course ;)
>
> Sorry, I don't understand you.
> You
Am 25.10.2010 um 23:14 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 25.10.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>>
>>> Stephan Witt wrote:
The patch is ready and attached.
I tested all CVS functions and it works here.
>>>
>>> looks fine.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>> the documentation of
20 matches
Mail list logo
