Le 17/04/2012 23:28, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 9:21 AM
I wonder whether in replaceAll whether the putSelectionAt call should be
removed. It seems to be overridden by the subsequent setCursor.
I've been meaning to
From: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org [lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org] on behalf of Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 6:50 AM
Don't bother with it. OTOH, your gentle nudge made me commit your patch
:) I just removed the new useless parameter 'backwards' of
Le 17/04/2012 23:28, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 9:21 AM
I wonder whether in replaceAll whether the putSelectionAt call should be
removed. It seems to be overridden by the subsequent setCursor.
I've been meaning to
From: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org [lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org] on behalf of Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 6:50 AM
>Don't bother with it. OTOH, your gentle nudge made me commit your patch
>:) I just removed the new useless parameter 'backwards' of
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 9:21 AM
I wonder whether in replaceAll whether the putSelectionAt call should be
removed. It seems to be overridden by the subsequent setCursor.
I've been meaning to give a more in-depth look at this but haven't done
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 9:21 AM
>I wonder whether in replaceAll whether the putSelectionAt call should be
>removed. It seems to be overridden by the subsequent setCursor.
I've been meaning to give a more in-depth look at this but haven't done
Le 10/03/12 07:09, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
So I suspect your patch is correct.
OK, let me know if there's anything else I should test/investigate regarding
this issue. Otherwise, I'll leave it in your hands.
I wonder whether in replaceAll whether the putSelectionAt call should be
Le 10/03/12 07:09, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
So I suspect your patch is correct.
OK, let me know if there's anything else I should test/investigate regarding
this issue. Otherwise, I'll leave it in your hands.
I wonder whether in replaceAll whether the putSelectionAt call should be
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 11:05 AM
I would try to fix the actual place that modifies cursor, which is
probably in findOne (lyxfind.cpp).
replaceOne is the function called.
What is the point of the following code in CutAndPaste.cpp's function
Le 09/03/2012 11:21, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 11:05 AM
I would try to fix the actual place that modifies cursor, which is
probably in findOne (lyxfind.cpp).
replaceOne is the function called.
What is the point
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 5:43 AM
The point was to fix bug 2068
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2068
which is related to spellchecker. [although I do not remember anything
about that :)]
Interesting! That looks quite tricky.
However, things
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 11:05 AM
>I would try to fix the actual place that modifies cursor, which is
>probably in findOne (lyxfind.cpp).
replaceOne is the function called.
What is the point of the following code in CutAndPaste.cpp's
Le 09/03/2012 11:21, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 11:05 AM
I would try to fix the actual place that modifies cursor, which is
probably in findOne (lyxfind.cpp).
replaceOne is the function called.
What is the point
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 5:43 AM
>The point was to fix bug 2068
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2068
>which is related to spellchecker. [although I do not remember anything
>about that :)]
Interesting! That looks quite tricky.
>However,
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 11:05 AM
I would try to fix the actual place that modifies cursor, which is
probably in findOne (lyxfind.cpp).
OK I will study this.
Thanks for the guidance,
Scott
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [lasgout...@lyx.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 11:05 AM
>I would try to fix the actual place that modifies cursor, which is
>probably in findOne (lyxfind.cpp).
OK I will study this.
Thanks for the guidance,
Scott
Le 01/03/2012 10:33, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Is this the right fix? This fixes the bug that I just reported, but I'm
worried that it would have unintended consequences for other functions
that use LFUN_WORD_REPLACE.
I would try to fix the actual place that modifies cursor, which is
probably
Le 01/03/2012 10:33, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Is this the right fix? This fixes the bug that I just reported, but I'm
worried that it would have unintended consequences for other functions
that use LFUN_WORD_REPLACE.
I would try to fix the actual place that modifies cursor, which is
probably
18 matches
Mail list logo