On 02/12/2010 22:45, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/01/2010 07:45 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Why not simply add a preamble editor in the branches dialog? LyX will
then collect the preamble for each branches. I guess this would be a
format change but it strikes me as the correct solution...
On 02/12/2010 22:45, Richard Heck wrote:
On 12/01/2010 07:45 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Why not simply add a preamble editor in the branches dialog? LyX will
then collect the preamble for each branches. I guess this would be a
format change but it strikes me as the correct solution...
On 12/01/2010 07:45 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Why not simply add a preamble editor in the branches dialog? LyX will
then collect the preamble for each branches. I guess this would be a
format change but it strikes me as the correct solution...
Kind of crowded already, but perhaps a combo
On 12/01/2010 07:45 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Why not simply add a preamble editor in the branches dialog? LyX will
then collect the preamble for each branches. I guess this would be a
format change but it strikes me as the correct solution...
Kind of crowded already, but perhaps a combo
On 2010-11-30, Richard Heck wrote:
On 11/30/2010 05:51 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-11-29, Michal wrote:
That's something I didn't know - I thought that the InPreamble
option works for 'Style' only. Well, I'll have to take a closer look
into a documentation then. Thank you for
On 01/12/2010 13:29, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-11-30, Richard Heck wrote:
On 11/30/2010 05:51 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-11-29, Michal wrote:
That's something I didn't know - I thought that the InPreamble
option works for 'Style' only. Well, I'll have to take a closer look
into
Why not simply add a preamble editor in the branches dialog? LyX will
then collect the preamble for each branches. I guess this would be a
format change but it strikes me as the correct solution...
This is similar to my first 'solution', which I've suggested a long
time ago. The reaction
On 2010-11-30, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 11/30/2010 05:51 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2010-11-29, Michal wrote:
>>> That's something I didn't know - I thought that the InPreamble
>>> option works for 'Style' only. Well, I'll have to take a closer look
>>> into a documentation then. Thank
On 01/12/2010 13:29, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-11-30, Richard Heck wrote:
On 11/30/2010 05:51 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-11-29, Michal wrote:
That's something I didn't know - I thought that the InPreamble
option works for 'Style' only. Well, I'll have to take a closer look
into
> Why not simply add a preamble editor in the branches dialog? LyX will
> then collect the preamble for each branches. I guess this would be a
> format change but it strikes me as the correct solution...
This is similar to my first 'solution', which I've suggested a long
time ago. The
On 2010-11-29, Michal wrote:
[...] After that, I think the only remaining thing is
to change the look of it to be more like ERT (typewriter font,
changing color to red, etc.)
This can all be done in a *.module file in your personal LYXDIR. See
the HelpCustomization documentation.
On 11/30/2010 05:51 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-11-29, Michal wrote:
That's something I didn't know - I thought that the InPreamble
option works for 'Style' only. Well, I'll have to take a closer look
into a documentation then. Thank you for pointing it out.
Sorry, I did not test
On 2010-11-29, Michal wrote:
>> > [...] After that, I think the only remaining thing is
>> > to change the look of it to be more like ERT (typewriter font,
>> > changing color to red, etc.)
>> This can all be done in a *.module file in your personal LYXDIR. See
>> the "Help>Customization"
On 11/30/2010 05:51 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-11-29, Michal wrote:
That's something I didn't know - I thought that the InPreamble
option works for 'Style' only. Well, I'll have to take a closer look
into a documentation then. Thank you for pointing it out.
Sorry, I did not test
On 11/28/2010 10:25 PM, Michal wrote:
I've fixed this, in the sense that you can now use LaTeXType
paragraph. Try this:
[...]
Thank you for your help! I guess I'll have to wait until the next
beta comes out then. After that, I think the only remaining thing is to
change the look of it to
On 2010-11-29, Michal wrote:
I've fixed this, in the sense that you can now use LaTeXType
paragraph. Try this:
[...]
Thank you for your help! I guess I'll have to wait until the next
beta comes out then. After that, I think the only remaining thing is to
change the look of it to be
I'll have to think about including it. It's a pretty specialized
thing, and seems to me to be very much
an expert capability (the way local layout was for a while).
I'm not sure. It could be very useful for novices, too. For
instance, let's assume that each branch contains the same text,
[...] After that, I think the only remaining thing is
to change the look of it to be more like ERT (typewriter font,
changing color to red, etc.)
This can all be done in a *.module file in your personal LYXDIR. See
the HelpCustomization documentation.
That is exactly what I meant.
On 11/28/2010 10:25 PM, Michal wrote:
I've fixed this, in the sense that you can now use "LaTeXType
paragraph". Try this:
[...]
Thank you for your help! I guess I'll have to wait until the next
beta comes out then. After that, I think the only remaining thing is to
change the look of it
On 2010-11-29, Michal wrote:
>> I've fixed this, in the sense that you can now use "LaTeXType
>> paragraph". Try this:
>> [...]
> Thank you for your help! I guess I'll have to wait until the next
> beta comes out then. After that, I think the only remaining thing is to
> change the look of
> I'll have to think about including it. It's a pretty specialized
> thing, and seems to me to be very much
> an "expert" capability (the way local layout was for a while).
I'm not sure. It could be very useful for novices, too. For
instance, let's assume that each branch contains the same
> > [...] After that, I think the only remaining thing is
> > to change the look of it to be more like ERT (typewriter font,
> > changing color to red, etc.)
>
> This can all be done in a *.module file in your personal LYXDIR. See
> the "Help>Customization" documentation.
That is exactly what
On 11/28/2010 01:21 AM, Michal Skrzypek wrote:
I think this may be quite easy to do already, though it is a bit of a
hack. LyX 2.0's layouts have an InPreamble tag, intended primarily
for use with document classes that want, say, \title to be in the
preamble. It should be possible to create a
I've fixed this, in the sense that you can now use LaTeXType
paragraph. Try this:
[...]
Thank you for your help! I guess I'll have to wait until the next
beta comes out then. After that, I think the only remaining thing is to
change the look of it to be more like ERT (typewriter font,
On 11/28/2010 01:21 AM, Michal Skrzypek wrote:
I think this may be quite easy to do already, though it is a bit of a
hack. LyX 2.0's layouts have an "InPreamble" tag, intended primarily
for use with document classes that want, say, \title to be in the
preamble. It should be possible to create a
> I've fixed this, in the sense that you can now use "LaTeXType
> paragraph". Try this:
> [...]
Thank you for your help! I guess I'll have to wait until the next
beta comes out then. After that, I think the only remaining thing is to
change the look of it to be more like ERT (typewriter
Some time ago I've suggested to allow for differentiating preambles
wrt branches, ie. allowing different preambles for different branches in
the same document.
Granted, this change was probably too big, and too little would be
gained... but now I have some idea which, as I suppose, would
On 11/27/10 10:03 PM, Michal wrote:
Some time ago I've suggested to allow for differentiating preambles
wrt branches, ie. allowing different preambles for different branches in
the same document.
Granted, this change was probably too big, and too little would be
gained... but now I
I think this may be quite easy to do already, though it is a bit of a
hack. LyX 2.0's layouts have an InPreamble tag, intended primarily
for use with document classes that want, say, \title to be in the
preamble. It should be possible to create a Preamble layout, with
InPreamble true, that
Some time ago I've suggested to allow for differentiating preambles
wrt branches, ie. allowing different preambles for different branches in
the same document.
Granted, this change was probably too big, and too little would be
gained... but now I have some idea which, as I suppose, would
On 11/27/10 10:03 PM, Michal wrote:
Some time ago I've suggested to allow for differentiating preambles
wrt branches, ie. allowing different preambles for different branches in
the same document.
Granted, this change was probably too big, and too little would be
gained... but now I
> I think this may be quite easy to do already, though it is a bit of a
> hack. LyX 2.0's layouts have an "InPreamble" tag, intended primarily
> for use with document classes that want, say, \title to be in the
> preamble. It should be possible to create a "Preamble" layout, with
> InPreamble
32 matches
Mail list logo
