show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Uwe Brauer
This is a long-standing request. You can find it on trac, if you look. Unfortunately, it is not at all easy to do. Well why not instead of displaying the latex source display directly the LyX source and allow it to be edited and then to be reloaded. Would such a solution be

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Pavel Sanda
Uwe Brauer wrote: This is a long-standing request. You can find it on trac, if you look. Unfortunately, it is not at all easy to do. Well why not instead of displaying the latex source display directly the LyX source and allow it to be edited and then to be reloaded.

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Well why not instead of displaying the latex source display directly the LyX source and allow it to be edited and then to be reloaded. Would such a solution be easier to implement? Why would anyone want to edit the LyX source (in LyX) ? Vincent

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
what looks much easier is to allow mutating math environment into ERT and back. pavel This is already possible. It needs some copy-pasting but it works. I once implemented this, but then disregarded it because it was essentially already possible. Vincent

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: what looks much easier is to allow mutating math environment into ERT and back. pavel This is already possible. It needs some copy-pasting but it works. I once implemented this, but then disregarded it because it was essentially already possible. i

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2010-06-07, Pavel Sanda wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: what looks much easier is to allow mutating math environment into ERT and back. pavel This is already possible. It needs some copy-pasting but it works. I once implemented this, but then disregarded it because it was

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Pavel Sanda
Guenter Milde wrote: * Backspace at the first position in the inset converts it to normal text (in this case LaTeX code (without beeing marked as ERT)) not in math inset. OK, I see 2 advantages: 1. no need to place the cursor or highlight thats what i call uncomfortable. pavel

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: * Backspace at the first position in the inset converts it to normal   text (in this case LaTeX code (without beeing marked as ERT)) not in math inset. OK, I see 2 advantages: 1. no need to place the

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: If you're such a power-user that you use it so often that this becomes uncomfortable, you probably should start to learn how to use the math inset to do the things you want. frankly i dont use it at all and the main point was about discoverability for normal users

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2010-06-07, Pavel Sanda wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: * Backspace at the first position in the inset converts it to normal text (in this case LaTeX code (without beeing marked as ERT)) not in math inset. Sorry, then this is a feature request. OK, I see 2 advantages: 1. no need to

show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Uwe Brauer
>> >> > This is a long-standing request. You can find it on trac, if you > look. Unfortunately, it is not at all easy to do. Well why not instead of displaying the "latex source" display directly the LyX source and allow it to be edited and then to be reloaded. Would such a solution

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Pavel Sanda
Uwe Brauer wrote: >>> >>> >> This is a long-standing request. You can find it on trac, if you >> look. Unfortunately, it is not at all easy to do. > > Well why not instead of displaying the "latex source" display > directly the LyX source and allow it to be edited and then to be

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
> Well why not instead of displaying the "latex source" display > directly the LyX source and allow it to be edited and then to be > reloaded. Would such a solution be easier to implement? > Why would anyone want to edit the LyX source (in LyX) ? Vincent

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
> what looks much easier is to allow mutating math environment into ERT > and back. > > pavel > This is already possible. It needs some copy-pasting but it works. I once implemented this, but then disregarded it because it was essentially already possible. Vincent

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > what looks much easier is to allow mutating math environment into ERT > > and back. > > > > pavel > > > > This is already possible. It needs some copy-pasting but it works. I > once implemented this, but then disregarded it because it was > essentially already

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2010-06-07, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >> > what looks much easier is to allow mutating math environment into ERT >> > and back. >> > >> > pavel >> > >> This is already possible. It needs some copy-pasting but it works. I >> once implemented this, but then disregarded

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Pavel Sanda
Guenter Milde wrote: > * Backspace at the first position in the inset converts it to normal > text (in this case LaTeX code (without beeing marked as ERT)) not in math inset. > OK, I see 2 advantages: > > 1. no need to place the cursor or highlight thats what i call uncomfortable. pavel

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> * Backspace at the first position in the inset converts it to normal >>   text (in this case LaTeX code (without beeing marked as ERT)) > > not in math inset. > >> OK, I see 2 advantages: >> >> 1. no need

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > If you're such a power-user that you use it so often that this becomes > uncomfortable, you probably should start to learn how to use the math > inset to do the things you want. frankly i dont use it at all and the main point was about discoverability for normal

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2010-06-07, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> * Backspace at the first position in the inset converts it to normal >> text (in this case LaTeX code (without beeing marked as ERT)) > not in math inset. Sorry, then this is a feature request. >> OK, I see 2 advantages: >> 1. no

feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code

2010-05-28 Thread Uwe Brauer
Hello One of the things I like in LyX is that the source code is shown. It is a little like reveal code in wordperfect, which I recently discovered. However sometimes lyx is doing things I don't want like inserting a new line. Would it be possible to manipulate directly the source code

Re: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code

2010-05-28 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/28/2010 06:13 AM, Uwe Brauer wrote: Hello One of the things I like in LyX is that the source code is shown. It is a little like reveal code in wordperfect, which I recently discovered. However sometimes lyx is doing things I don't want like inserting a new line. Would it be possible to

feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code

2010-05-28 Thread Uwe Brauer
Hello One of the things I like in LyX is that the source code is shown. It is a little like reveal code in wordperfect, which I recently discovered. However sometimes lyx is doing things I don't want like inserting a new line. Would it be possible to manipulate directly the source code

Re: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code

2010-05-28 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/28/2010 06:13 AM, Uwe Brauer wrote: Hello One of the things I like in LyX is that the source code is shown. It is a little like reveal code in wordperfect, which I recently discovered. However sometimes lyx is doing things I don't want like inserting a new line. Would it be possible to