On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 01:25:32AM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Friday, August 19, 2016 11:06:15 PM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > I see, but José seems against it. So it would be nice to see what others
> > think.
> >
> > Scott
>
> FWIW, in case it was not clear, I have/had a
On Friday, August 19, 2016 11:06:15 PM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I see, but José seems against it. So it would be nice to see what others
> think.
>
> Scott
FWIW, in case it was not clear, I have/had a minor/minimal objection. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 10:50:12AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 04:17:31PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > My view on this: it is fine as long as it is some standard "edit" gesture
> > that can be used for graphics and external inserts too.
>
> OK and for insets
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 04:17:31PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> My view on this: it is fine as long as it is some standard "edit" gesture
> that can be used for graphics and external inserts too.
OK and for insets that do not have an edit operation we just do nothing.
I tried to think
My view on this: it is fine as long as it is some standard "edit" gesture that
can be used for graphics and external inserts too.
Jmarc
Le 20 août 2016 05:06:15 GMT+02:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>I see, but José seems against it. So it would be nice to see what
>others
Le 20/08/2016 à 04:06, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I see, but José seems against it. So it would be nice to see what others
think.
Subject line sounds intuitive.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:15:51PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 08/17/2016 10:14 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 04:28:15PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> >> On 08/09/2016 02:03 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 4:56 AM, Scott Kostyshak
On 08/17/2016 10:14 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 04:28:15PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
>> On 08/09/2016 02:03 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 4:56 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Dear LyX devs,
The following behavior is
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 04:28:15PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 08/09/2016 02:03 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 4:56 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> Dear LyX devs,
> >>
> >> The following behavior is shared by Firefox and Chromium:
> >>
> >>
On 08/09/2016 02:03 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 4:56 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> Dear LyX devs,
>>
>> The following behavior is shared by Firefox and Chromium:
>>
>> ctrl+left-click opens a tab but does not switch to it
>> middle-click is the same as
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 4:56 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Dear LyX devs,
>
> The following behavior is shared by Firefox and Chromium:
>
> ctrl+left-click opens a tab but does not switch to it
> middle-click is the same as ctrl+left click
> shift+middle-click opens the tab and
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 09:02:25PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Yet for me a browser is a read-only process where I am a consumer
> while with
> lyx is a write process where I am a producer/maker. That is to say
> that
> mentally that analogy is not obvious. I would not expect for lyx to
>
On Friday, August 5, 2016 10:56:31 PM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Dear LyX devs,
>
> The following behavior is shared by Firefox and Chromium:
>
> ctrl+left-click opens a tab but does not switch to it
> middle-click is the same as ctrl+left click
> shift+middle-click opens the tab and switches
Dear LyX devs,
The following behavior is shared by Firefox and Chromium:
ctrl+left-click opens a tab but does not switch to it
middle-click is the same as ctrl+left click
shift+middle-click opens the tab and switches to it
Since learning about middle-click to open tabs in browsers, I find it
14 matches
Mail list logo