Rod == Rod Pinna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rod Against the 1.4.0 cvs. Allows for numbered sections as does the
Rod class file. Let me know if I've done the diff incorrectly.
I'd rather have unified diffs (diff -u) and also a diff to changelog.
Also, it is better if you are in top source
Rod == Rod Pinna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rod It may be a slow evolution. I'm currently trying to write a draft
Rod paper using it, so I may come across other bits and bobs.
Which is the right way of doing things. I wish ore layout would
receive polish.
JMarc
> "Rod" == Rod Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rod> Against the 1.4.0 cvs. Allows for numbered sections as does the
Rod> class file. Let me know if I've done the diff incorrectly.
I'd rather have unified diffs (diff -u) and also a diff to changelog.
Also, it is better if you are in top
> "Rod" == Rod Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rod> It may be a slow evolution. I'm currently trying to write a draft
Rod> paper using it, so I may come across other bits and bobs.
Which is the right way of doing things. I wish ore layout would
receive polish.
JMarc
Against the 1.4.0 cvs. Allows for numbered sections as does the class
file. Let me know if I've done the diff incorrectly.
Rod
$cvs diff elsart.layout
Index: elsart.layout
===
RCS file:
It may be a slow evolution. I'm currently trying to write a draft paper
using it, so I may come across other bits and bobs.
Rod
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Rob Lahaye wrote:
Rod Pinna wrote:
Against the 1.4.0 cvs. Allows for numbered sections as does the class
file. Let me know if I've done
Against the 1.4.0 cvs. Allows for numbered sections as does the class
file. Let me know if I've done the diff incorrectly.
Rod
$cvs diff elsart.layout
Index: elsart.layout
===
RCS file:
It may be a slow evolution. I'm currently trying to write a draft paper
using it, so I may come across other bits and bobs.
Rod
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Rob Lahaye wrote:
>
> Rod Pinna wrote:
> > Against the 1.4.0 cvs. Allows for numbered sections as does the class
> > file. Let me know if I've