Re: unicodesymbols, utf8 and textcomp

On 2013-02-19, Georg Baum wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: On 2013-02-17, Georg Baum wrote: This is not needed: the simple force flag does not force for any utf8 encoding. It worked always like that, but now I added an explanation to the unicodesymbols file. The force flag is ignored for

Re: unicodesymbols, utf8 and textcomp

On 2013-02-19, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> On 2013-02-17, Georg Baum wrote: >>> This is not needed: the simple force flag does not force for any utf8 >>> encoding. It worked always like that, but now I added an explanation to >>> the unicodesymbols file. >> The "force" flag is

Re: unicodesymbols, utf8 and textcomp

Guenter Milde wrote: On 2013-02-17, Georg Baum wrote: This is not needed: the simple force flag does not force for any utf8 encoding. It worked always like that, but now I added an explanation to the unicodesymbols file. The force flag is ignored for Unicode (XeTeX) and Unicode (utf8x)

Re: unicodesymbols, utf8 and textcomp

Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2013-02-17, Georg Baum wrote: > >> This is not needed: the simple force flag does not force for any utf8 >> encoding. It worked always like that, but now I added an explanation to >> the unicodesymbols file. > > The "force" flag is ignored for Unicode (XeTeX) and

Re: unicodesymbols, utf8 and textcomp

Guenter Milde wrote: Dear LyX developers, the unicodesymbols file contains many replacements that require the textcomp package. Some are forced, others not, e.g. 0x00a9 \\textcopyright textcomp # COPYRIGHT SIGN 0x00ac \\textlnot textcomp force \\neg # ¬ NOT

Re: Re: unicodesymbols, utf8 and textcomp

Am Sonntag, 17. Februar 2013 um 13:22:23, schrieb Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de Guenter Milde wrote: Dear LyX developers, the unicodesymbols file contains many replacements that require the textcomp package. Some are forced, others not, e.g. 0x00a9 \\textcopyright

Re: Re: unicodesymbols, utf8 and textcomp

Kornel Benko wrote: It is not needed for utf8, but maybe it would be handy for other encodings. Therefore the generalized syntax force!=... may well be helpful. Sure. But I am personally too lazy to implement it without any existing use case. Georg

Re: unicodesymbols, utf8 and textcomp

On 2013-02-17, Georg Baum wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: Dear LyX developers, the unicodesymbols file contains many replacements that require the textcomp package. Some are forced, others not, e.g. 0x00a9 \\textcopyright textcomp # COPYRIGHT SIGN 0x00ac \\textlnot

Re: unicodesymbols, utf8 and textcomp

Guenter Milde wrote: > Dear LyX developers, > > the "unicodesymbols" file contains many replacements that require the > "textcomp" package. Some are "forced", others not, e.g. > > 0x00a9 "\\textcopyright" "textcomp" "" # COPYRIGHT SIGN > > 0x00ac "\\textlnot"

Re: Re: unicodesymbols, utf8 and textcomp

Am Sonntag, 17. Februar 2013 um 13:22:23, schrieb Georg Baum > Guenter Milde wrote: > > > Dear LyX developers, > > > > the "unicodesymbols" file contains many replacements that require the > > "textcomp" package. Some are "forced", others not, e.g. > > > >

Re: Re: unicodesymbols, utf8 and textcomp

Kornel Benko wrote: > It is not needed for utf8, but maybe it would be handy for other > encodings. Therefore the generalized syntax "force!=..." may well be > helpful. Sure. But I am personally too lazy to implement it without any existing use case. Georg

Re: unicodesymbols, utf8 and textcomp

On 2013-02-17, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> Dear LyX developers, >> the "unicodesymbols" file contains many replacements that require the >> "textcomp" package. Some are "forced", others not, e.g. >> 0x00a9 "\\textcopyright" "textcomp" "" # COPYRIGHT SIGN >> 0x00ac