On 05.02.20 00:22, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Alternatively, just try this:
>> http://ftp.lyx.de/Documentation/en/UserGuide.pdf (2.3.3)
>>
>> open in Preview or Skim.
>
> No problem here with Preview or Skim.
> "The LYX User’s Guide
> by the LYX Team∗ Version 2.2.x
> April 20, 2017"
> Preview Version
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 06:56:07AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2020, 19:11 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > It might be worth to report it, do we have clue whether adding all
> > other languages is heavy in terms of space (are some dictionaries
> > needed?)
>
> It's no
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 07:00:59AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I think if people would complain, those packagers might revisit their
> decisions. These are really just a few Linux distros who do this. I
> don't think we should let ourselves constrain from this really
> nonsensical decision.
Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 09:45 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda :
> I checked in more detail debian and their of packaging is unf language
> based (so e.g. everything french related is in a single package worth
> of 70 mb for texlive 2019).
>
That's ridiculous. OpenSuse ships a texlive-babel-french package
Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 10:24 Uhr schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Why not? I mean, this packaging structure is plain stupid.
>
Wow. I had a look now. So everybody who needs to use French as a secondary
language (be it for one single word or quotation) needs to install all
French translations of ma
Am 05.02.2020 um 09:15 schrieb mn :
>
> On 05.02.20 00:22, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>>> Alternatively, just try this:
>>> http://ftp.lyx.de/Documentation/en/UserGuide.pdf (2.3.3)
>>>
>>> open in Preview or Skim.
>>
>> No problem here with Preview or Skim.
>> "The LYX User’s Guide
>> by the LYX Tea
Am 05.02.2020 um 07:02 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 05.02.2020, 00:32 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> Yes, but LyX can test for footnotehyper's presence with
>> isAvailable().
>> Patch attached, ok?
>
> Are you sure docs do not break with hyperref and plain footnote
> package?
Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 10:53 Uhr schrieb Stephan Witt :
> Yes, I’m sure. Because it’s already broken for missing footnotehyper
> package.
This does not mean that it doesn't break without footnotehyper.
Rather than just omitting footnotehyper, it might be necessary to omit
footnote (or hyperref
Am 05.02.2020 um 10:57 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 10:53 Uhr schrieb Stephan Witt :
> Yes, I’m sure. Because it’s already broken for missing footnotehyper package.
>
> This does not mean that it doesn't break without footnotehyper.
>
> Rather than just omitting footn
Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 11:11 Uhr schrieb Stephan Witt :
> I’m no expert for these things. But a normal user wants to see the users
> guide and not errors.
>
Thus I rephrase my question: Did you check that you get no other errors
(caused by the hyperref/footnote incompatibility) if you simply omi
Am 05.02.2020 um 11:53 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 11:11 Uhr schrieb Stephan Witt :
> I’m no expert for these things. But a normal user wants to see the users
> guide and not errors.
>
> Thus I rephrase my question: Did you check that you get no other errors
> (cau
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:24:12AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > So instead of reporting missing dependency we would need to ask for
> > restructuring the packaging, which is I am afraid too long shot.
> >
>
> Why not? I mean, this packaging structure is plain stupid.
I don't have really o
Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 12:40 Uhr schrieb Stephan Witt :
> > Thus I rephrase my question: Did you check that you get no other errors
> (caused by the hyperref/footnote incompatibility) if you simply omit
> footnotehyper?
>
> Yes I did. I get other errors with input encodings.
>
Do this depend on
Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 13:06 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda :
> I don't have really opinion about this, knowing very little about texlive
> packaging, I don't even understand why is all-language-related-stuff into
> single package stupid, hence I won't be able to explain myself to packagers
> either :)
Am 05.02.2020 um 15:08 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 12:40 Uhr schrieb Stephan Witt :
> > Thus I rephrase my question: Did you check that you get no other errors
> > (caused by the hyperref/footnote incompatibility) if you simply omit
> > footnotehyper?
>
> Yes I did
Due to bug #11728, I'm going to be doing an emergency update for Windows
either tonight or tomorrow. Just a warning.
Riki
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 03:10:17PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > I don't have really opinion about this, knowing very little about texlive
> > packaging, I don't even understand why is all-language-related-stuff into
> > single package stupid, hence I won't be able to explain myself to packa
Le 31/01/2020 à 20:46, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
Public release of LyX version 2.3.4
===
We are proud to announce the release of LyX 2.3.4. This is the fourth
maintenance release in the 2.3.x series.
I got a working LyX installation where the 4 UserGuides
> Am 05.02.2020 um 23:33 schrieb emile lunardon :
>
> I have installed LyX 2.3.4 on Windows10 and the same crash already seen on
> LyX for Linux occurs when trying to enter the two Math Symbols :
> $\textrm{Ø}\textrm{Å}$
>
> Le mer. 5 févr. 2020 à 08:32, emile lunardon a
> écrit :
> When I tr
Am 06.02.2020 um 00:18 schrieb Stephan Witt :
>
>> Am 05.02.2020 um 23:33 schrieb emile lunardon :
>>
>> I have installed LyX 2.3.4 on Windows10 and the same crash already seen on
>> LyX for Linux occurs when trying to enter the two Math Symbols :
>> $\textrm{Ø}\textrm{Å}$
>>
>> Le mer. 5 févr
I assume this is an old bug? Or is it a new one?
On 2/5/20 6:49 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 06.02.2020 um 00:18 schrieb Stephan Witt :
>>> Am 05.02.2020 um 23:33 schrieb emile lunardon :
>>>
>>> I have installed LyX 2.3.4 on Windows10 and the same crash already seen on
>>> LyX for Linux occurs
On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 11:38:24AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> commit d207e85cfda2893de4e6c7f419c58aa342395f47
> Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Date: Fri Nov 4 11:35:22 2016 +0100
>
> Clear background behind sublables when necessary.
>
> This is analogous to what has been
Am 06.02.2020 um 01:02 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
>
> I assume this is an old bug? Or is it a new one?
I can reproduce something similar with 2.4.0 too. But I cannot reproduce with
2.2.4.
So it’s rather new.
Stephan
>
> On 2/5/20 6:49 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 06.02.2020 um 00:18 sc
23 matches
Mail list logo
