On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 02:22:46AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Montag, 7. August 2017 um 19:32:15, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:36:34AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > Am Sonntag, 6. August 2017 um 21:55:57, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Aug 06,
Am Montag, 7. August 2017 um 19:32:15, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:36:34AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 6. August 2017 um 21:55:57, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> > > On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 10:17:16AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > >
> > > > This should n
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:36:34AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 6. August 2017 um 21:55:57, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 10:17:16AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >
> > > This should not happen. The check for the need of reconfiguration is done
> > > at LyX.cp
Am Sonntag, 6. August 2017 um 21:55:57, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 10:17:16AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > This should not happen. The check for the need of reconfiguration is done
> > at LyX.cpp:1053
> > bool LyX::queryUserLyXDir(bool explicit_userdir)
> > which i
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 10:17:16AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> This should not happen. The check for the need of reconfiguration is done at
> LyX.cpp:1053
> bool LyX::queryUserLyXDir(bool explicit_userdir)
> which is called at LyX.cpp:921.
> This call is guarded with fileLock(lock_file.c_s
Am Sonntag, 6. August 2017 um 01:10:02, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> I usually do the following for running the ctests:
>
> ctest -j$( nproc )
> ctest --rerun-failed
>
> This has behaved robustly for a while. However, I've recently gained access
> to a
> server where I could run 64 jobs s
I usually do the following for running the ctests:
ctest -j$( nproc )
ctest --rerun-failed
This has behaved robustly for a while. However, I've recently gained access to a
server where I could run 64 jobs simultaneously, and now the above approach
shows problems, compared to results from
