Re: [tinyPATCH] \underleftarrow \underrightarrow
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 09:35:30AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 01:20:32AM +0100, Otto Tronarp wrote: \underleftarrow and \underrightarrow looked simple enough for me so here comes a tiny patch. I don't know that much about latex but since \over*arrow needs to be protected I guessed that \under*arrow needs it too /Otto On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 22:03, Dekel Tsur wrote: On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:44:51PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: basic support for \xymatrix I'd rather see full support for AMS math, before supporting other packages. Missing environments: flalign,flalign*,gathered, aligned, alignedat Some missing commands: \intertext \hdotsfor \dddot, \ot \overleftrightarrow,\underleftarrow,\underrightarrow,\underleftrightarrow, \xleftarrow,\xrightarroow \tag \raisetag Works for me... and here they are placed on the decorations panel. Attached. Martin One that actually works instead... attached. Sorry for the noise. Martin diff.gz Description: application/gunzip msg32715/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [tinyPATCH] \underleftarrow \underrightarrow
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 10:42:16AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: One that actually works instead... attached. Too late. Already applied. Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [tinyPATCH] \underleftarrow \underrightarrow
On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 22:03, Dekel Tsur wrote: I'd rather see full support for AMS math, before supporting other packages. Missing environments: flalign,flalign*,gathered, aligned, alignedat Some missing commands: \intertext Is \intertext conceptually different from \mbox? The text in \intertext can be several lines long, so this means that in lyx, \intertext needs line breaking. However, as a first step, we can add support for \intertext without line breaking.
Re: [tinyPATCH] \underleftarrow \underrightarrow
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 02:59:32PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: The text in \intertext can be several lines long, so this means that in lyx, \intertext needs line breaking. However, as a first step, we can add support for \intertext without line breaking. But then we can not call it 'intertext' because we won't be able to handle all case we might encounter in imported files. I think the problem is equivalent to the \mbox implementation, and this (I guess I said so already) is not feasible right now. Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [tinyPATCH] \underleftarrow \underrightarrow
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 03:07:19PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 02:59:32PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
The text in \intertext can be several lines long, so this means that in
lyx, \intertext needs line breaking. However, as a first step, we can
add support for \intertext without line breaking.
But then we can not call it 'intertext' because we won't be able to handle
all case we might encounter in imported files. I think the problem is
equivalent to the \mbox implementation, and this (I guess I said so already)
is not feasible right now.
A partial support is still better than no support at all.
Suppose that you have
\begin{align*}
a = b\\
= c\\
\intertext{This is a long sentence...}
= d
\end{align*}
With basic \intertext support you will see on screen
---|
a = b |
= c |
This is a long |sentence.
= d | ^^^ this is outside the lyx screen.
---+
while with no \intertext support you will get
---|
| a = b
| = c
\intertext{This is a long sentence...} = d
---+
namely almost everything is outside the screen.
Re: [tinyPATCH] \underleftarrow \underrightarrow
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 04:35:17PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: A partial support is still better than no support at all. I am trying to say that getting 'partial' support right is not easy (if possible at all). You might want to prepare a patch to prove me wrong on that ;-} Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [tinyPATCH] \underleftarrow & \underrightarrow
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 09:35:30AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 01:20:32AM +0100, Otto Tronarp wrote: > > > > \underleftarrow and \underrightarrow looked simple enough for me so here > > comes a tiny patch. I don't know that much about latex but since > > \over*arrow needs to be protected I guessed that \under*arrow needs it > > too > > > > > > /Otto > > > > > > On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 22:03, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:44:51PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > basic support for \xymatrix > > > > > > I'd rather see full support for AMS math, before supporting other packages. > > > > > > Missing environments: > > > flalign,flalign*,gathered, aligned, alignedat > > > > > > Some missing commands: > > > \intertext > > > \hdotsfor > > > \dddot, \ot > > > \overleftrightarrow,\underleftarrow,\underrightarrow,\underleftrightarrow, > > > \xleftarrow,\xrightarroow > > > \tag > > > \raisetag > > > > > Works for me... and here they are placed on the decorations panel. > Attached. > > Martin One that actually works instead... attached. Sorry for the noise. Martin diff.gz Description: application/gunzip msg32715/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [tinyPATCH] \underleftarrow & \underrightarrow
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 10:42:16AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > One that actually works instead... attached. Too late. Already applied. Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [tinyPATCH] \underleftarrow & \underrightarrow
> > On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 22:03, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > > I'd rather see full support for AMS math, before supporting other packages. > > > > > > Missing environments: > > > flalign,flalign*,gathered, aligned, alignedat > > > > > > Some missing commands: > > > \intertext > > Is \intertext conceptually different from \mbox? The text in \intertext can be several lines long, so this means that in lyx, \intertext needs line breaking. However, as a first step, we can add support for \intertext without line breaking.
Re: [tinyPATCH] \underleftarrow & \underrightarrow
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 02:59:32PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > The text in \intertext can be several lines long, so this means that in > lyx, \intertext needs line breaking. However, as a first step, we can > add support for \intertext without line breaking. But then we can not call it 'intertext' because we won't be able to handle all case we might encounter in imported files. I think the problem is equivalent to the \mbox implementation, and this (I guess I said so already) is not feasible right now. Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [tinyPATCH] \underleftarrow & \underrightarrow
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 03:07:19PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 02:59:32PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > The text in \intertext can be several lines long, so this means that in
> > lyx, \intertext needs line breaking. However, as a first step, we can
> > add support for \intertext without line breaking.
>
> But then we can not call it 'intertext' because we won't be able to handle
> all case we might encounter in imported files. I think the problem is
> equivalent to the \mbox implementation, and this (I guess I said so already)
> is not feasible right now.
A partial support is still better than no support at all.
Suppose that you have
\begin{align*}
a & = b\\
& = c\\
\intertext{This is a long sentence...}
& = d
\end{align*}
With basic \intertext support you will see on screen
---|
a = b |
= c |
This is a long |sentence.
= d | ^^^ this is outside the lyx screen.
---+
while with no \intertext support you will get
---|
| a = b
| = c
\intertext{This is a long sentence...} = d
---+
namely almost everything is outside the screen.
Re: [tinyPATCH] \underleftarrow & \underrightarrow
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 04:35:17PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > A partial support is still better than no support at all. I am trying to say that getting 'partial' support right is not easy (if possible at all). You might want to prepare a patch to prove me wrong on that ;-} Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [tinyPATCH] \underleftarrow \underrightarrow
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 01:20:32AM +0100, Otto Tronarp wrote: \underleftarrow and \underrightarrow looked simple enough for me so here comes a tiny patch. I don't know that much about latex but since \over*arrow needs to be protected I guessed that \under*arrow needs it too /Otto On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 22:03, Dekel Tsur wrote: On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:44:51PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: basic support for \xymatrix I'd rather see full support for AMS math, before supporting other packages. Missing environments: flalign,flalign*,gathered, aligned, alignedat Some missing commands: \intertext \hdotsfor \dddot, \ot \overleftrightarrow,\underleftarrow,\underrightarrow,\underleftrightarrow, \xleftarrow,\xrightarroow \tag \raisetag Works for me... and here they are placed on the decorations panel. Attached. Martin -- Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Helsinki University of Technology Department of Surveying P.O. Box 1200, FIN-02015 HUT, Finland :wq diff.gz Description: application/gunzip msg32711/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [tinyPATCH] \underleftarrow \underrightarrow
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 01:20:32AM +0100, Otto Tronarp wrote: \underleftarrow and \underrightarrow looked simple enough for me so here comes a tiny patch. Looks good. Applied. Thank you. I don't know that much about latex but since \over*arrow needs to be protected I guessed that \under*arrow needs it too It does not hurt in any case. Andre' PS: For some funny reason I did not get that mail: On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 22:03, Dekel Tsur wrote: I'd rather see full support for AMS math, before supporting other packages. Missing environments: flalign,flalign*,gathered, aligned, alignedat Some missing commands: \intertext Is \intertext conceptually different from \mbox? \hdotsfor \dddot, \ot So, things are missing... well that's bad. We can't do much about it, can we? Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [tinyPATCH] \underleftarrow & \underrightarrow
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 01:20:32AM +0100, Otto Tronarp wrote: > > \underleftarrow and \underrightarrow looked simple enough for me so here > comes a tiny patch. I don't know that much about latex but since > \over*arrow needs to be protected I guessed that \under*arrow needs it > too > > > /Otto > > > On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 22:03, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:44:51PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > basic support for \xymatrix > > > > I'd rather see full support for AMS math, before supporting other packages. > > > > Missing environments: > > flalign,flalign*,gathered, aligned, alignedat > > > > Some missing commands: > > \intertext > > \hdotsfor > > \dddot, \ot > > \overleftrightarrow,\underleftarrow,\underrightarrow,\underleftrightarrow, > > \xleftarrow,\xrightarroow > > \tag > > \raisetag > > Works for me... and here they are placed on the decorations panel. Attached. Martin -- Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Helsinki University of Technology Department of Surveying P.O. Box 1200, FIN-02015 HUT, Finland :wq diff.gz Description: application/gunzip msg32711/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [tinyPATCH] \underleftarrow & \underrightarrow
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 01:20:32AM +0100, Otto Tronarp wrote: > \underleftarrow and \underrightarrow looked simple enough for me so here > comes a tiny patch. Looks good. Applied. Thank you. > I don't know that much about latex but since > \over*arrow needs to be protected I guessed that \under*arrow needs it > too It does not hurt in any case. Andre' PS: For some funny reason I did not get that mail: > On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 22:03, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > I'd rather see full support for AMS math, before supporting other packages. > > > > Missing environments: > > flalign,flalign*,gathered, aligned, alignedat > > > > Some missing commands: > > \intertext Is \intertext conceptually different from \mbox? > > \hdotsfor > > \dddot, \ot So, things are missing... well that's bad. We can't do much about it, can we? Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
