On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 04:11:09PM +, John Levon wrote:
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 08:35:11PM +0100, Uwe St?hr wrote:
The UserGuide will also have a short section about needed programs
and install issues for the platforms Linux/Unix, Mac and Win.
IMO, whilst such docs would be great,
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 03:58:08PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
BTW. If LyX 1.4 is such a big step to the future why don't we name it
LyX 2.0?
Because most of the infrastructure changes will bear user visible fruit
only in the next release, or even later.
Btw2 Is it planned to release LyX 1.4
Uwe == Uwe Stöhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Uwe Georg Baum wrote:
I see one problem: What happens to the 1.4 documentation? At some
point one would need to merge your changes back. Did you consider
to leave 1.3 as is and modify 1.4 instead? This would avoid some
additional work. IMHO we
Uwe == Uwe Stöhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Uwe I couldn't found a list of command line options for LyX. Where
Uwe can I find one?
lyx --help
man lyx
Uwe At last I have a suit: Could some body have a look at bug
Uwe 922/1332? Because it is very annoying to loose the format when
Uwe copying
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
So, to make things clear, your target version is 1.4.0, right?
Yes it is.
regards Uwe
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:41:56AM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Uwe Sthr wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Indeed. Having it in the UserGuide only serves people masochistic enough
to read it either as .lyx in a text editor before installation or after
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 11:35:02AM +0100, Asger Kunuk Ottar Alstrup wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
Does the COPYING file apply to all the doc/ documentation that
don't have any license in them?
For example, I don't see any republishing or reuse license for
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 04:11:09PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 08:35:11PM +0100, Uwe St?hr wrote:
>
> > The UserGuide will also have a short section about needed programs
> > and install issues for the platforms Linux/Unix, Mac and Win.
>
> IMO, whilst such docs would
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 03:58:08PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> BTW. If LyX 1.4 is such a big step to the future why don't we name it
> LyX 2.0?
Because most of the infrastructure changes will bear user visible fruit
only in the next release, or even later.
> Btw2 Is it planned to release LyX 1.4
> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Uwe> Georg Baum wrote:
>> I see one problem: What happens to the 1.4 documentation? At some
>> point one would need to merge your changes back. Did you consider
>> to leave 1.3 as is and modify 1.4 instead? This would avoid some
>> additional
> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Uwe> I couldn't found a list of command line options for LyX. Where
Uwe> can I find one?
lyx --help
man lyx
Uwe> At last I have a suit: Could some body have a look at bug
Uwe> 922/1332? Because it is very annoying to loose the format when
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
So, to make things clear, your target version is 1.4.0, right?
Yes it is.
regards Uwe
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:41:56AM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
> > Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > > Indeed. Having it in the UserGuide only serves people masochistic enough
> > > to read it either as .lyx in a text editor before installation or
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 11:35:02AM +0100, Asger Kunuk Ottar Alstrup wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
>
> > Does the COPYING file apply to all the doc/ documentation that
> > don't have any license in them?
> >
> > For example, I don't see any republishing or reuse license for
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
