On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:38:04AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
>
> As a side note, I've noticed that diffs are a terrible way of trying to
> see what is different in a LyX doc. The diff itself is impossible to read
[snip]
> into LyX :-) Perhaps we should do something "silly" like put all edits i
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:38:04AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, John Levon wrote:
> 1.1.6 as well. I'd better do it fast for fix3 I guess. So I can commit
> the change to head for it to get in 116 right ? I'll commit if so
I've be
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:38:04AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, John Levon wrote:
> > Mike, I haven't had an "OK" from you on this patch. Is it ok for 1.2.0 ?
>
> Arg, I didn't help myself by updating Customization - I have many rejected
> chunks when trying to apply your pa
Mike Ressler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a side note, I've noticed that diffs are a terrible way of trying to
> see what is different in a LyX doc. The diff itself is impossible to read
> (and this will be especially true as we convert 1.1.6 to 1.2.0 with all
> the inset changes), and applyin
On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, John Levon wrote:
> Mike, I haven't had an "OK" from you on this patch. Is it ok for 1.2.0 ?
Arg, I didn't help myself by updating Customization - I have many rejected
chunks when trying to apply your patch, mostly due to the new inset code.
Is your patch 1.2.0 specific, or d
Mike, I haven't had an "OK" from you on this patch. Is it ok for 1.2.0 ?
thanks
john
--
"Voodoo Programming: Things programmers do that they know shouldn't work but
they try anyway, and which sometimes actually work, such as recompiling
everything."
- Karl Lehenbauer
viewdvidoc.di
