> "nbecker" == nbecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
nbecker> Claims to be klyx-0.9.9. Got from kde cvsup within last few
nbecker> days. In the source is ANNOUNCE.lyx-1.0, but I guess I can't
nbecker> tell which lyx version it really is.
Try to send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], then. KLy
Claims to be klyx-0.9.9. Got from kde cvsup within last few days. In
the source is ANNOUNCE.lyx-1.0, but I guess I can't tell which lyx
version it really is.
--
+++ the lyx project user mailing list +++
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to
On Fri, Feb 26, 1999 at 04:59:03PM +0100, ZioBudda wrote:
> Hi, when I compile lyx I have see that it not found sgmltools. Infact I do
> not use sgmltools but docbook.. How can I say lyx to use docbook sgml?
> and again where i van found this items:
Hi,
lyx doesn't support docbook yet.
Hi, when I compile lyx I have see that it not found sgmltools. Infact I do
not use sgmltools but docbook.. How can I say lyx to use docbook sgml?
and again where i van found this items:
+checking for document class IEEEtran [IEEEtran.cls]... no
+checking for document class iletter [iletter.cls]...
> "nbecker" == nbecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
nbecker> I don't see any abstract in amsart. Why not? I do see it
nbecker> under article.
Which lyx version are you using? It seems to me that it is here, just
between Author and Address...
JMarc
--
+++ the lyx project
I don't see any abstract in amsart. Why not? I do see it under
article.
--
+++ the lyx project user mailing list +++
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the **Subject** unsubscribe.
> "jph" == jph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jph> So there was no LyX install problem to report really.
Happy end :)
jph> thank you
De rien.
JMarc
--
+++ the lyx project user mailing list +++
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes ironized
> I suspect that your installation is not perfect :)
An excellent observation!
On Irix-6.5.2, the teTeX-0.4 install was my problem:
-it had compiled to the end with gcc (egcs-1.1b) but produced a
faulty TeX which failed only occasionally. I later found in the
ma
