including files

Hello, Is there in lyx the equivalent of the \input foofilename latex directive that could be used to include xxx.lyx files? Thanks Jacques -- Dr. Jacques B. Siboni mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8 pass. Charles Albert, F75018 Paris, France Tel. Fax: 33 (0) 1 42 28 76 78 Home Page:

Re: including files

Jacques B. Siboni wrote: Is there in lyx the equivalent of the \input foofilename latex directive that could be used to include xxx.lyx files? Choose Insert menu/Include File (before submenu insert file). Then you can choose what do you want. -- German Poo Caaman~o mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: the problem of reLyX

On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 06:05:18PM +0100, Yong Luo wrote: Hi,all, I exported a latex file (foo.tex) from LyX file (foo.lyx). I tried to import the same file from foo.tex but it is not working. I did not change anything of foo.tex. Is there any one can tell me why? Thanks! My foo.lyx is

bibliographic references

hi I've have just printed my assignment, all 60 pages of it, and I noticed an inconsistency between the printed version and what lyx shows me. It is the bibliographic references. In lyx, it works with the correct link, but in the printed version (and the dvi of course) it gives me a questionmark

spellchecker

Hi all, there is still some conmfusion about my aspell .32.2 alpha, when running spellchecking an error message occures that the ipell process has somewhat died, including a hint to usr/lib/ispell (which doesn't exist, its usr/lib/aspell, anyway) and a missing dictionary. So I adjusted the

Re: bibliographic references

This happens when the key you used in the reference doesn't match anything in the database bibtex searches. You could have misspelled a key, misspelled the name of the .bib database, or when you made the database you didn't run texconfig rehash... In any case, the problem is that bibtex can't

lyxlookup.C and deadkeys

Hello, I have installed the version lyx-1.1.6fix2 and I encounter the same problems with dead keys that I had with version 1.1.4. Handling of dead keys is better but the grave accent is not correct and the ^ ' ` obtained with quote space do not lead to the correct ascii chars. I patched the

inserting document 1 into document 2.

Hello, My problem is as follow. I have a document 1 with specific format requirements (namely a technical paper) that I would like to include into a larger document (namely a thesis). I can not directly 'include LyX file' because of the incompatibility between the format of both documents. What

Re: inserting document 1 into document 2.

Stephan D. Picard wrote: My first thought was to include a postscript version of document 1 into document 2 but it shrinks significantly the dimension of document 1. Perhaps a neat way of inserting the printed pages in document 2 would work but unless I seperatly print the 2 documents and

Re: inserting document 1 into document 2.

My first thought was to include a postscript version of document 1 into document 2 but it shrinks significantly the dimension of document 1. Perhaps a neat way of inserting the printed pages in document 2 would work but unless I seperatly print the 2 documents and then insert one in

Re: What version of XForms should we use?

Lars Gullik Bj nnes wrote: Peter S Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hello, | | [Please let me know if this should have gone to lyx-devel instead.] LyX devel would probably have been better... Next tiem I'll know better. Some developers are using 0.88 all the time and some are

Re: CV class version 1.5 released

* Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-07-23 16:49] schrieb: Ronny == Ronny Buchmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ronny * Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ronny [2001-06-18 18:08] schrieb: Since nobody complained about the test version of cv-1.5 I announced last week

Re: Unreviewed dvi docs patch

Mike Ressler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As a side note, I've noticed that diffs are a terrible way of trying to see what is different in a LyX doc. The diff itself is impossible to read (and this will be especially true as we convert 1.1.6 to 1.2.0 with all the inset changes), and applying the

including files

Hello, Is there in lyx the equivalent of the \input foofilename latex directive that could be used to include xxx.lyx files? Thanks Jacques -- Dr. Jacques B. Siboni mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8 pass. Charles Albert, F75018 Paris, France Tel. Fax: 33 (0) 1 42 28 76 78 Home Page:

Re: including files

Am Montag, 23. Juli 2001 09:11 schrieb Jacques B. Siboni: Hello, Is there in lyx the equivalent of the \input foofilename latex directive that could be used to include xxx.lyx files? Yes :-) Chose from the Menue Insert - Include File ...where you can chose between \input and \include.

Re: including files

Jacques B. Siboni wrote: Is there in lyx the equivalent of the \input foofilename latex directive that could be used to include xxx.lyx files? Choose Insert menu/Include File (before submenu insert file). Then you can choose what do you want. -- German Poo Caaman~o mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: the problem of reLyX

On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 06:05:18PM +0100, Yong Luo wrote: Hi,all, I exported a latex file (foo.tex) from LyX file (foo.lyx). I tried to import the same file from foo.tex but it is not working. I did not change anything of foo.tex. Is there any one can tell me why? Thanks! My foo.lyx is

bibliographic references

hi I've have just printed my assignment, all 60 pages of it, and I noticed an inconsistency between the printed version and what lyx shows me. It is the bibliographic references. In lyx, it works with the correct link, but in the printed version (and the dvi of course) it gives me a questionmark

spellchecker

Hi all, there is still some conmfusion about my aspell .32.2 alpha, when running spellchecking an error message occures that the ipell process has somewhat died, including a hint to usr/lib/ispell (which doesn't exist, its usr/lib/aspell, anyway) and a missing dictionary. So I adjusted the

Re: bibliographic references

This happens when the key you used in the reference doesn't match anything in the database bibtex searches. You could have misspelled a key, misspelled the name of the .bib database, or when you made the database you didn't run texconfig rehash... In any case, the problem is that bibtex can't

lyxlookup.C and deadkeys

Hello, I have installed the version lyx-1.1.6fix2 and I encounter the same problems with dead keys that I had with version 1.1.4. Handling of dead keys is better but the grave accent is not correct and the ^ ' ` obtained with quote space do not lead to the correct ascii chars. I patched the

inserting document 1 into document 2.

Hello, My problem is as follow. I have a document 1 with specific format requirements (namely a technical paper) that I would like to include into a larger document (namely a thesis). I can not directly 'include LyX file' because of the incompatibility between the format of both documents. What

Re: inserting document 1 into document 2.

Stephan D. Picard wrote: My first thought was to include a postscript version of document 1 into document 2 but it shrinks significantly the dimension of document 1. Perhaps a neat way of inserting the printed pages in document 2 would work but unless I seperatly print the 2 documents and

Re: inserting document 1 into document 2.

My first thought was to include a postscript version of document 1 into document 2 but it shrinks significantly the dimension of document 1. Perhaps a neat way of inserting the printed pages in document 2 would work but unless I seperatly print the 2 documents and then insert one in

Re: What version of XForms should we use?

Lars Gullik Bj nnes wrote: Peter S Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hello, | | [Please let me know if this should have gone to lyx-devel instead.] LyX devel would probably have been better... Next tiem I'll know better. Some developers are using 0.88 all the time and some are

Re: CV class version 1.5 released

* Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-07-23 16:49] schrieb: Ronny == Ronny Buchmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ronny * Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ronny [2001-06-18 18:08] schrieb: Since nobody complained about the test version of cv-1.5 I announced last week

Re: Unreviewed dvi docs patch

Mike Ressler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As a side note, I've noticed that diffs are a terrible way of trying to see what is different in a LyX doc. The diff itself is impossible to read (and this will be especially true as we convert 1.1.6 to 1.2.0 with all the inset changes), and applying the

including files

Hello, Is there in lyx the equivalent of the \input foofilename latex directive that could be used to include xxx.lyx files? Thanks Jacques -- Dr. Jacques B. Siboni mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8 pass. Charles Albert, F75018 Paris, France Tel. & Fax: 33 (0) 1 42 28 76 78 Home Page:

Re: including files

Am Montag, 23. Juli 2001 09:11 schrieb Jacques B. Siboni: > Hello, > > Is there in lyx the equivalent of the > \input foofilename > latex directive that could be used to include xxx.lyx files? Yes :-) Chose from the Menue Insert -> Include File ...where you can chose between \input and \include.

Re: including files

"Jacques B. Siboni" wrote: > Is there in lyx the equivalent of the > \input foofilename > latex directive that could be used to include xxx.lyx files? Choose Insert menu/Include File (before submenu insert file). Then you can choose what do you want. -- German Poo Caaman~o mailto:[EMAIL

Re: the problem of reLyX

On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 06:05:18PM +0100, Yong Luo wrote: > Hi,all, > > I exported a latex file (foo.tex) from LyX file (foo.lyx). > I tried to import the same file from foo.tex but it is not > working. I did not change anything of foo.tex. > > Is there any one can tell me why? Thanks! > My

bibliographic references

hi I've have just printed my assignment, all 60 pages of it, and I noticed an inconsistency between the printed version and what lyx shows me. It is the bibliographic references. In lyx, it works with the correct link, but in the printed version (and the dvi of course) it gives me a questionmark

spellchecker

Hi all, there is still some conmfusion about my aspell .32.2 alpha, when running spellchecking an error message occures that the ipell process has somewhat died, including a hint to usr/lib/ispell (which doesn't exist, its usr/lib/aspell, anyway) and a missing dictionary. So I adjusted the

Re: bibliographic references

This happens when the key you used in the reference doesn't match anything in the database bibtex searches. You could have misspelled a key, misspelled the name of the .bib database, or when you made the database you didn't run "texconfig rehash"... In any case, the problem is that bibtex

lyxlookup.C and deadkeys

Hello, I have installed the version lyx-1.1.6fix2 and I encounter the same problems with dead keys that I had with version 1.1.4. Handling of dead keys is better but the grave accent is not correct and the ^ ' " ` obtained with do not lead to the correct ascii chars. I patched the

inserting document 1 into document 2.

Hello, My problem is as follow. I have a document 1 with specific format requirements (namely a technical paper) that I would like to include into a larger document (namely a thesis). I can not directly 'include LyX file' because of the incompatibility between the format of both documents. What

Re: inserting document 1 into document 2.

"Stephan D. Picard" wrote: > > My first thought was to include a postscript version of document 1 into > document 2 but it shrinks significantly the dimension of document > 1. Perhaps a neat way of inserting the printed pages in document 2 would > work but unless I seperatly print the 2

Re: inserting document 1 into document 2.

> > My first thought was to include a postscript version of document 1 into > > document 2 but it shrinks significantly the dimension of document > > 1. Perhaps a neat way of inserting the printed pages in document 2 would > > work but unless I seperatly print the 2 documents and then insert one

Re: What version of XForms should we use?

Lars Gullik Bj nnes wrote: > Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Hello, > | > | [Please let me know if this should have gone to lyx-devel instead.] > > LyX devel would probably have been better... Next tiem I'll know better. > Some developers are using 0.88 all the time

Re: CV class version 1.5 released

* Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-07-23 16:49] schrieb: > > "Ronny" == Ronny Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ronny> * Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ronny> [2001-06-18 18:08] schrieb: > >> Since nobody complained about the test version of cv-1.5 I > >>

Re: Unreviewed dvi docs patch

Mike Ressler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As a side note, I've noticed that diffs are a terrible way of trying to > see what is different in a LyX doc. The diff itself is impossible to read > (and this will be especially true as we convert 1.1.6 to 1.2.0 with all > the inset changes), and