rubber page size for creating figures?

2003-03-23 Thread Christopher M. Jones
I want to create a simple figure to import into a LaTeX document. How do I get a pagesize that 'fits' itself around the figure, rather than simply setting the figure into the middle of a (e.g.) USLetter size page? Do I have to fiddle with the page size until it is just about as big as the

tex limits on pictures

2003-03-23 Thread John Sheahan
Hi I am writing a manual with lyx, I have a bunch of included postscript graphics. (schematics) linux redhat 8.0, lyx 1.2.3 and 1.3.0 both. this document uses fancyhdr and fancy style. I find I can include 18 images in a row, including 19 causes errors when exporting to pdflatex, (and other

CJK-LyX-1.3.1

2003-03-23 Thread cghan
Hello, CJK-LyX-1.3.1 has been uploaded at the following ftp site, ftp://stone.phys.pusan.ac.kr/pub/CJK-LyX . THis one is much more stable than the buggy CJK-LyX-1.3.0 (sorry for that!). Be sure that your xforms-1,0-i18n is updated to the current version, 'xforms-1.0-i18n_6'. Regards, cghan

Re: math editor problems - 1.3.1

2003-03-23 Thread Nirmal Govind
In this case it might be the \mathrm in your equation which then includes \mathbf (maybe you pressed C-m by mistake within the equation?). Thanks Amir.. after reading your post, I looked more carefully and there was a C-m in there for no reason.. I should add however, that when I deleted

rubber page size for creating figures?

2003-03-23 Thread Christopher M. Jones
I want to create a simple figure to import into a LaTeX document. How do I get a pagesize that 'fits' itself around the figure, rather than simply setting the figure into the middle of a (e.g.) USLetter size page? Do I have to fiddle with the page size until it is just about as big as the

tex limits on pictures

2003-03-23 Thread John Sheahan
Hi I am writing a manual with lyx, I have a bunch of included postscript graphics. (schematics) linux redhat 8.0, lyx 1.2.3 and 1.3.0 both. this document uses fancyhdr and fancy style. I find I can include 18 images in a row, including 19 causes errors when exporting to pdflatex, (and other

CJK-LyX-1.3.1

2003-03-23 Thread cghan
Hello, CJK-LyX-1.3.1 has been uploaded at the following ftp site, ftp://stone.phys.pusan.ac.kr/pub/CJK-LyX . THis one is much more stable than the buggy CJK-LyX-1.3.0 (sorry for that!). Be sure that your xforms-1,0-i18n is updated to the current version, 'xforms-1.0-i18n_6'. Regards, cghan

Re: math editor problems - 1.3.1

2003-03-23 Thread Nirmal Govind
In this case it might be the \mathrm in your equation which then includes \mathbf (maybe you pressed C-m by mistake within the equation?). Thanks Amir.. after reading your post, I looked more carefully and there was a C-m in there for no reason.. I should add however, that when I deleted

rubber page size for creating figures?

2003-03-23 Thread Christopher M. Jones
I want to create a simple figure to import into a LaTeX document. How do I get a pagesize that 'fits' itself around the figure, rather than simply setting the figure into the middle of a (e.g.) USLetter size page? Do I have to fiddle with the page size until it is just about as big as the

tex limits on pictures

2003-03-23 Thread John Sheahan
Hi I am writing a manual with lyx, I have a bunch of included postscript graphics. (schematics) linux redhat 8.0, lyx 1.2.3 and 1.3.0 both. this document uses fancyhdr and fancy style. I find I can include 18 images in a row, including 19 causes errors when exporting to pdflatex, (and other

CJK-LyX-1.3.1

2003-03-23 Thread cghan
Hello, CJK-LyX-1.3.1 has been uploaded at the following ftp site, ftp://stone.phys.pusan.ac.kr/pub/CJK-LyX . THis one is much more stable than the buggy CJK-LyX-1.3.0 (sorry for that!). Be sure that your xforms-1,0-i18n is updated to the current version, 'xforms-1.0-i18n_6'. Regards, cghan

Re: math editor problems - 1.3.1

2003-03-23 Thread Nirmal Govind
> In this case it might be the \mathrm in your equation which then > includes \mathbf (maybe you pressed C-m by mistake within the equation?). Thanks Amir.. after reading your post, I looked more carefully and there was a C-m in there for no reason.. > I should add however, that when I