Re: LyX 1.0

2023-01-10 Thread Herbert Voss
Am 11.01.23 um 01:37 schrieb José Matos: On Tue, 2023-01-10 at 11:23 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote: Yes, I can share it. Not sure about the exact result ! Thank The attached file loads correctly in 2.3 (and Fedora FWIW). :-) Technically the problem was that the first ERT inset was not

Re: LyX 1.0

2023-01-10 Thread José Matos
On Tue, 2023-01-10 at 11:23 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Yes, I can share it. > Not sure about the exact result ! > > Thank The attached file loads correctly in 2.3 (and Fedora FWIW). :-) Technically the problem was that the first ERT inset was not enclosed in a (Plain) layout. I am not sure

Re: issue with psline

2023-01-10 Thread Herbert Voss
Patrick Dupre schrieb: > kpsewhich luapstricks.lua > Your texlive is too old for lualatex and pstricks with directly created pdf without Ghostscript Herbert > no output > > === > Patrick DUPRÉ

Re: issue with psline

2023-01-10 Thread Patrick Dupre
kpsewhich luapstricks.lua no output === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex

Re: issue with psline

2023-01-10 Thread Herbert Voss
Am 10.01.23 um 21:11 schrieb Patrick Dupre: lualatex --version This is LuaHBTeX, Version 1.13.0 (TeX Live 2021) Maybe too old. Does kpsewhich luapstricks.lua gives an output of the directory? Herbert Execute 'luahbtex --credits' for credits and version details. There is NO

Re: issue with psline

2023-01-10 Thread Patrick Dupre
lualatex --version This is LuaHBTeX, Version 1.13.0 (TeX Live 2021) Execute 'luahbtex --credits' for credits and version details. There is NO warranty. Redistribution of this software is covered by the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2 or (at your option) any later version.

Re: LyX 1.0

2023-01-10 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 1/10/23 05:23, Patrick Dupre wrote: Yes, I can share it. Not sure about the exact result ! That got attached inline, so it's hard to deal with. It seems like the file is truncated. In any event, I'm guessing what you really want is the pspicture code, which is about all there is there. I

Re: issue with psline

2023-01-10 Thread Herbert Voss
Am 10.01.23 um 19:19 schrieb Patrick Dupre: OK Herbert, The compilation is OK, but it does not do the \psline[linecolor=blue,linewidth=10.5pt](3,1)(2,2) Note that I have the same issue with latex dvips ps2pdf on a fedora (fc36) machine ! What does the output of lualatex --version show? 

Re: LyX 1.0

2023-01-10 Thread Dr Eberhard W Lisse
Does not look like a LyX file to me. /Applications/LyX.app//Contents/Resources/lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx -n t.lyx -o new.lyx shows : Warning: Version does not match file format, discarding it. (Version None, format 215) Warning: Malformed LyX document: Missing '\use_amsmath'.

Re: issue with psline

2023-01-10 Thread Patrick Dupre
OK Herbert, The compilation is OK, but it does not do the \psline[linecolor=blue,linewidth=10.5pt](3,1)(2,2) Note that I have the same issue with latex dvips ps2pdf on a fedora (fc36) machine ! === Patrick DUPRÉ

Re: issue with psline

2023-01-10 Thread Herbert Voss
Am 10.01.23 um 18:23 schrieb Patrick Dupre: Hello, Does the compilation of this file OK for you? I get ! Undefined control sequence. \c@lor@to@ps ->\PSTricks _Not_Configured_For_This_Format l.28 ... \psline[linecolor=blue,linewidth=10.5pt](

issue with psline

2023-01-10 Thread Patrick Dupre
Hello, Does the compilation of this file OK for you? I get ! Undefined control sequence. \c@lor@to@ps ->\PSTricks _Not_Configured_For_This_Format l.28 ... \psline[linecolor=blue,linewidth=10.5pt]( 3,1)(2,2)

Re: LyX 2.3.7 Released

2023-01-10 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 07:30:50AM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote: > So, it's most likely that the lyx upgrade used qt5-5.12.8. Ok, can you post the exact parameters given to configure in your script? Pavel -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org

Re: LyX 2.3.7 Released

2023-01-10 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 07:31:37AM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2023, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > >(and if you download 2.3.6 tarball the build script still work on your > >system, right?) > > Yes. That's what I did last October. No, I mean now. We did not changed that much so it

Re: LyX 2.3.7 Released

2023-01-10 Thread Rich Shepard
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023, Pavel Sanda wrote: (and if you download 2.3.6 tarball the build script still work on your system, right?) Yes. That's what I did last October. Rich -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Re: LyX 2.3.7 Released

2023-01-10 Thread Rich Shepard
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023, Pavel Sanda wrote: Ok. Do you know what Qt version was used on your system for previous 2.3.6? Pavel, qt-4.8.7-x86_64-4 (installed Jan 17 2021) qt5-5.12.8-x86_64-1_SBo (installed Oct 2 2021) and lyx-2.3.6.1-x86_64-1_SBo (installed Oct 31 2022) So, it's most likely

Re: LyX 2.3.7 Released

2023-01-10 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 03:40:34PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 05:39:42AM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Jan 2023, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > >Are you always starting with clean compilation tree? > > > > Pavel, > > > > Yes, and I don't use any Apple products.

Re: LyX 2.3.7 Released

2023-01-10 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 05:39:42AM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2023, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > >Are you always starting with clean compilation tree? > > Pavel, > > Yes, and I don't use any Apple products. Ok. Do you know what Qt version was used on your system for previous 2.3.6?

Re: LyX 2.3.7 Released

2023-01-10 Thread Rich Shepard
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023, Pavel Sanda wrote: Are you always starting with clean compilation tree? Pavel, Yes, and I don't use any Apple products. Regards, Rich -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Re: LyX 2.3.7 Released

2023-01-10 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 12:27:04PM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > >Try with the configure option > >--enable-qt4 > > Jürgen, > > Changing the configure variable from qt5 to qt4 makes no difference. The > same error(s) stop the build: Are you

Re: LyX 1.0

2023-01-10 Thread Patrick Dupre
Yes, I can share it. Not sure about the exact result ! Thank --- #This file was created by Wed Aug 22 20:08:36 2001 #LyX 1.0 (C) 1995-1999 Matthias Ettrich and the LyX Team \lyxformat 2.15 \textclass article \papersize a4paper \options american,portrait,dvips \begin_preamble

Re: LyX 1.0

2023-01-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 10/01/2023 à 10:36, Patrick Dupre a écrit : Hello, I have an old lyx file (LyX 1.0) that I cannot open with lyx. Is there an option to read or convert it? Hello, In theory, it should be readable. This is probably a bug with lyx2lyx, our version converter. Is that a file that you can

LyX 1.0

2023-01-10 Thread Patrick Dupre
Hello, I have an old lyx file (LyX 1.0) that I cannot open with lyx. Is there an option to read or convert it? Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire