Hi Jean-Marc,
Oui, c'est ca!
Thanks so much for your help and also to Allan. That was the final key to
get it to compile. I had to move the Lsstream.h include statement to the
end of the includes in the following files:
src/Spacing.C:#include Lsstream.h
src/buffer.C:#include Lsstream.h
Hi Jean-Marc,
Oui, c'est ca!
Thanks so much for your help and also to Allan. That was the final key to
get it to compile. I had to move the Lsstream.h include statement to the
end of the includes in the following files:
src/Spacing.C:#include Lsstream.h
src/buffer.C:#include Lsstream.h
Hi Jean-Marc,
Oui, c'est ca!
Thanks so much for your help and also to Allan. That was the final key to
get it to compile. I had to move the Lsstream.h include statement to the
end of the includes in the following files:
src/Spacing.C:#include "Lsstream.h"
src/buffer.C:#include "Lsstream.h"
Hi Allan,
I tried exactly as you suggested and that did not work. So I finally gave
up and downloaded GNU make. All my missing file problems went away. I did
configure with the --with-included-string option, but now it complains
with:
../../src/LString.h:20: #error The string header has been
Hi Allan,
I tried exactly as you suggested and that did not work. So I finally gave
up and downloaded GNU make. All my missing file problems went away. I did
configure with the --with-included-string option, but now it complains
with:
../../src/LString.h:20: #error The string header has been
Hi Allan,
I tried exactly as you suggested and that did not work. So I finally gave
up and downloaded GNU make. All my missing file problems went away. I did
configure with the --with-included-string option, but now it complains
with:
../../src/LString.h:20: #error The header has been included
suggestions?
Dave
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, David Bailey wrote:
Hi Allan,
Actually, there is an acconfig.h in the sigc++ directory already. It is
identical to the one you sent out.
It sounds like something more peculiar to the make utility on the tru64
Actually in my last email I had a syntax error in the as script. It should
be:
#!/bin/sh
/usr/bin/as -oldas $*
This does correct the problems with my last point about the Invalid
stabs/stabn directives. I had some additional touching to do in
sigc++/macros after that:
object.h.m4 marshal.h.m4
suggestions?
Dave
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, David Bailey wrote:
Hi Allan,
Actually, there is an acconfig.h in the sigc++ directory already. It is
identical to the one you sent out.
It sounds like something more peculiar to the make utility on the tru64
Actually in my last email I had a syntax error in the as script. It should
be:
#!/bin/sh
/usr/bin/as -oldas $*
This does correct the problems with my last point about the Invalid
stabs/stabn directives. I had some additional touching to do in
sigc++/macros after that:
object.h.m4 marshal.h.m4
here ... :(
Any other suggestions?
Dave
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, David Bailey wrote:
>
> > Hi Allan,
> >
> > Actually, there is an acconfig.h in the sigc++ directory already. It is
> > identical to the one you sent out.
>
Actually in my last email I had a syntax error in the as script. It should
be:
#!/bin/sh
/usr/bin/as -oldas $*
This does correct the problems with my last point about the Invalid
stabs/stabn directives. I had some additional touching to do in
sigc++/macros after that:
object.h.m4 marshal.h.m4
Hi Allan,
Actually, there is an acconfig.h in the sigc++ directory already. It is
identical to the one you sent out.
It sounds like something more peculiar to the make utility on the tru64
operating system?
Regards,
Dave
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, David
Hi Allan,
Actually, there is an acconfig.h in the sigc++ directory already. It is
identical to the one you sent out.
It sounds like something more peculiar to the make utility on the tru64
operating system?
Regards,
Dave
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, David
Hi Allan,
Actually, there is an acconfig.h in the sigc++ directory already. It is
identical to the one you sent out.
It sounds like something more peculiar to the make utility on the tru64
operating system?
Regards,
Dave
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Da
Hi there,
I new to LyX and I just downloaded lyx-1.1.6fix1. I running an
alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 with gcc 2.95.3. Peer Frank had posted a message on
the 16th of January:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg08602.html
that he was having troubles compiling on a version 4.0
Hi there,
I new to LyX and I just downloaded lyx-1.1.6fix1. I running an
alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 with gcc 2.95.3. Peer Frank had posted a message on
the 16th of January:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg08602.html
that he was having troubles compiling on a version 4.0
Hi there,
I new to LyX and I just downloaded lyx-1.1.6fix1. I running an
alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 with gcc 2.95.3. Peer Frank had posted a message on
the 16th of January:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg08602.html
that he was having troubles compiling on a version 4.0
18 matches
Mail list logo
