Re: [noob q] Recursive sections?

On Saturday 19 February 2005 12:41, Glenn Davy wrote: Is there a template or layout readily available for lyx that will provide that type of functionality? Alternatively what are my other options for deeper nesting of subsections? No. At this time the only option is use the traditional

Re: [noob q] Recursive sections?

Glenn Davy wrote: Is there a template or layout readily available for lyx that will provide that type of functionality? If you need a way to switch easily between article kind of classes (where section is the uppermost level) and book (which has chapter one level higher), then you might try

Re: [noob q] Recursive sections?

On Saturday 19 February 2005 12:41, Glenn Davy wrote: Is there a template or layout readily available for lyx that will provide that type of functionality? Alternatively what are my other options for deeper nesting of subsections? No. At this time the only option is use the traditional

Re: [noob q] Recursive sections?

Glenn Davy wrote: Is there a template or layout readily available for lyx that will provide that type of functionality? If you need a way to switch easily between article kind of classes (where section is the uppermost level) and book (which has chapter one level higher), then you might try

Re: [noob q] Recursive sections?

On Saturday 19 February 2005 12:41, Glenn Davy wrote: > Is there a template or layout readily available for lyx that will provide > that type of functionality? Alternatively what are my other options for > deeper nesting of subsections? No. At this time the only option is use the traditional

Re: [noob q] Recursive sections?

Glenn Davy wrote: > Is there a template or layout readily available for lyx that will provide > that type of functionality? If you need a way to switch easily between article kind of classes (where section is the uppermost level) and book (which has chapter one level higher), then you might

[noob q] Recursive sections?

Hi I'm completely new to lyx, latex and tex (I've successfully avoided them for years - all looked too intimidating). I've done the very easy lyx intro and tutorial. I'm liking lyx (no pun) and tried using it today to do some 'real' work. I'm using using the default set of styles (is styles

Re: [noob q] Recursive sections?

On Sat, 19 Feb 2005, Glenn Davy wrote: I'm using using the default set of styles (is styles the correct word) with section, subsection etc - but am running out of nested 'sections'. Docbook SGML in its DTD has two type of 'section' tags the SECT[12345] set and also the SECTION tag, which allows

[noob q] Recursive sections?

Hi I'm completely new to lyx, latex and tex (I've successfully avoided them for years - all looked too intimidating). I've done the very easy lyx intro and tutorial. I'm liking lyx (no pun) and tried using it today to do some 'real' work. I'm using using the default set of styles (is styles

Re: [noob q] Recursive sections?

On Sat, 19 Feb 2005, Glenn Davy wrote: I'm using using the default set of styles (is styles the correct word) with section, subsection etc - but am running out of nested 'sections'. Docbook SGML in its DTD has two type of 'section' tags the SECT[12345] set and also the SECTION tag, which allows

[noob q] Recursive sections?

Hi I'm completely new to lyx, latex and tex (I've successfully avoided them for years - all looked too intimidating). I've done the very easy lyx intro and tutorial. I'm liking lyx (no pun) and tried using it today to do some 'real' work. I'm using using the default set of styles (is styles

Re: [noob q] Recursive sections?

On Sat, 19 Feb 2005, Glenn Davy wrote: I'm using using the default set of styles (is styles the correct word) with section, subsection etc - but am running out of nested 'sections'. Docbook SGML in its DTD has two type of 'section' tags the set and also the tag, which allows you in