Alternative numbering for tables

2011-06-09 Thread Giacomo Z
Dear Lyx users, I searched on the list but I could not find any advice on my problem: I would like to differently number the float tables. This is an example of a sequence: Table 1: Table 2a: Table 2b: Table 3: etc... Is that possible? I found the LATEX package amsthm, but it seems not to be

Re: Alternative numbering for tables

2011-06-09 Thread Richard Heck
On 06/09/2011 07:13 AM, Giacomo Z wrote: Dear Lyx users, I searched on the list but I could not find any advice on my problem: I would like to differently number the float tables. This is an example of a sequence: Table 1: Table 2a: Table 2b: Table 3: etc... Is that possible? I found

Re: Alternative numbering for tables

2011-06-09 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 09.06.2011 13:13, schrieb Giacomo Z: Dear Lyx users, I searched on the list but I could not find any advice on my problem: I would like to differently number the float tables. This is an example of a sequence: Table 1: Table 2a: Table 2b: Table 3: etc... Is that possible? See sec. 3.7

Re: Alternative numbering for tables

2011-06-09 Thread Giacomo Zanello
Many thanks Richard and Uwe. I am in a situation where the two tables have very similar content but not to be put into the same table. Therefore, a solution of numbering 1a and 2b may fit. I refer to the help section Owe suggested me. Many thanks for the prompt help. Giacomo On 9 June 2011

Alternative numbering for tables

2011-06-09 Thread Giacomo Z
Dear Lyx users, I searched on the list but I could not find any advice on my problem: I would like to differently number the float tables. This is an example of a sequence: Table 1: Table 2a: Table 2b: Table 3: etc... Is that possible? I found the LATEX package amsthm, but it seems not to be

Re: Alternative numbering for tables

2011-06-09 Thread Richard Heck
On 06/09/2011 07:13 AM, Giacomo Z wrote: Dear Lyx users, I searched on the list but I could not find any advice on my problem: I would like to differently number the float tables. This is an example of a sequence: Table 1: Table 2a: Table 2b: Table 3: etc... Is that possible? I found

Re: Alternative numbering for tables

2011-06-09 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 09.06.2011 13:13, schrieb Giacomo Z: Dear Lyx users, I searched on the list but I could not find any advice on my problem: I would like to differently number the float tables. This is an example of a sequence: Table 1: Table 2a: Table 2b: Table 3: etc... Is that possible? See sec. 3.7

Re: Alternative numbering for tables

2011-06-09 Thread Giacomo Zanello
Many thanks Richard and Uwe. I am in a situation where the two tables have very similar content but not to be put into the same table. Therefore, a solution of numbering 1a and 2b may fit. I refer to the help section Owe suggested me. Many thanks for the prompt help. Giacomo On 9 June 2011

Alternative numbering for tables

2011-06-09 Thread Giacomo Z
Dear Lyx users, I searched on the list but I could not find any advice on my problem: I would like to differently number the float tables. This is an example of a sequence: Table 1: Table 2a: Table 2b: Table 3: etc... Is that possible? I found the LATEX package "amsthm", but it seems not to be

Re: Alternative numbering for tables

2011-06-09 Thread Richard Heck
On 06/09/2011 07:13 AM, Giacomo Z wrote: > Dear Lyx users, > > I searched on the list but I could not find any advice on my problem: > I would like to differently number the float tables. This is an > example of a sequence: > Table 1: > Table 2a: > Table 2b: > Table 3: > etc... > > Is that

Re: Alternative numbering for tables

2011-06-09 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 09.06.2011 13:13, schrieb Giacomo Z: Dear Lyx users, I searched on the list but I could not find any advice on my problem: I would like to differently number the float tables. This is an example of a sequence: Table 1: Table 2a: Table 2b: Table 3: etc... Is that possible? See sec. 3.7

Re: Alternative numbering for tables

2011-06-09 Thread Giacomo Zanello
Many thanks Richard and Uwe. I am in a situation where the two tables have very similar content but not to be put into the same table. Therefore, a solution of numbering 1a and 2b may fit. I refer to the help section Owe suggested me. Many thanks for the prompt help. Giacomo On 9 June 2011