Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-30 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:38:21 -0800 (PST), Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I, too, see this. But, I'm not sure it's a bug. In the normal course of events would one open a new document and an ERT box then leave them both empty and unsaved while opening a second document? I fail to see

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-30 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:11:32 +0100 (BST), Geoffrey Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also dont feel it is a bug. Once you actually return to the original document (with the open ERT window) and type anywhere the text disappears (on my win32 setup at least) and the box returns to its empty state

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-30 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Paul Smith wrote: The same behaviour, Rich, occurs even if one has previously saved the first document and the first document can be a non-empty one, i.e., it can be a long document with, e.g., a minipage open and the cursor inside the open minipage. Having two documents open

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-30 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:38:21 -0800 (PST), Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I, too, see this. But, I'm not sure it's a bug. In the normal course of events would one open a new document and an ERT box then leave them both empty and unsaved while opening a second document? I fail to see

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-30 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:11:32 +0100 (BST), Geoffrey Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also dont feel it is a bug. Once you actually return to the original document (with the open ERT window) and type anywhere the text disappears (on my win32 setup at least) and the box returns to its empty state

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-30 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Paul Smith wrote: The same behaviour, Rich, occurs even if one has previously saved the first document and the first document can be a non-empty one, i.e., it can be a long document with, e.g., a minipage open and the cursor inside the open minipage. Having two documents open

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-30 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:38:21 -0800 (PST), Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I, too, see this. But, I'm not sure it's a bug. In the normal course of > events would one open a new document and an ERT box then leave them both > empty and unsaved while opening a second document? I fail to

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-30 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:11:32 +0100 (BST), Geoffrey Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also dont feel it is a bug. Once you actually return to the original > document (with the open ERT window) and type anywhere the text disappears > (on my win32 setup at least) and the box returns to its empty

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-30 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Paul Smith wrote: The same behaviour, Rich, occurs even if one has previously saved the first document and the first document can be a non-empty one, i.e., it can be a long document with, e.g., a minipage open and the cursor inside the open minipage. Having two documents open

Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread Paul Smith
Dear All I would like to ask you for confirming the following bug, which can be reproduced in the following way: * open a new document and open an empty ERT, keeping the ERT and the document open; * open a different document and selecting something therein; * return to the first document and

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread John Coppens
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:26:07 +0100 Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear All I would like to ask you for confirming the following bug, which can be reproduced in the following way: * open a new document and open an empty ERT, keeping the ERT and the document open; * open a different

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 04:26:07PM +0100, Paul Smith wrote: * open a new document and open an empty ERT, keeping the ERT and the document open; * open a different document and selecting something therein; * return to the first document and look at the open ERT. Please file a bug on

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread Eugenio Guevara
- Original Message - From: John Coppens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:02 AM Subject: Re: Asking for confirming a bug On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:26:07 +0100 Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear All I would like to ask you

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread Angus Leeming
John Coppens wrote: Dear All I would like to ask you for confirming the following bug, which can be reproduced in the following way: * open a new document and open an empty ERT, keeping the ERT and the document open; * open a different document and selecting something therein; * return

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:15:36 +0100, Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to ask you for confirming the following bug, which can be reproduced in the following way: * open a new document and open an empty ERT, keeping the ERT and the document open; * open a different

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread Rich Shepard
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, John Coppens wrote: Same problem here, 1.3.5 on Slackware. I, too, see this. But, I'm not sure it's a bug. In the normal course of events would one open a new document and an ERT box then leave them both empty and unsaved while opening a second document? I fail to see the

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread Geoffrey Lloyd
I also dont feel it is a bug. Once you actually return to the original document (with the open ERT window) and type anywhere the text disappears (on my win32 setup at least) and the box returns to its empty state (albeit with what you just typed in it!) I think this is a pointing device

Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread Paul Smith
Dear All I would like to ask you for confirming the following bug, which can be reproduced in the following way: * open a new document and open an empty ERT, keeping the ERT and the document open; * open a different document and selecting something therein; * return to the first document and

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread John Coppens
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:26:07 +0100 Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear All I would like to ask you for confirming the following bug, which can be reproduced in the following way: * open a new document and open an empty ERT, keeping the ERT and the document open; * open a different

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 04:26:07PM +0100, Paul Smith wrote: * open a new document and open an empty ERT, keeping the ERT and the document open; * open a different document and selecting something therein; * return to the first document and look at the open ERT. Please file a bug on

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread Eugenio Guevara
- Original Message - From: John Coppens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:02 AM Subject: Re: Asking for confirming a bug On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:26:07 +0100 Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear All I would like to ask you

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread Angus Leeming
John Coppens wrote: Dear All I would like to ask you for confirming the following bug, which can be reproduced in the following way: * open a new document and open an empty ERT, keeping the ERT and the document open; * open a different document and selecting something therein; * return

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:15:36 +0100, Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to ask you for confirming the following bug, which can be reproduced in the following way: * open a new document and open an empty ERT, keeping the ERT and the document open; * open a different

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread Rich Shepard
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, John Coppens wrote: Same problem here, 1.3.5 on Slackware. I, too, see this. But, I'm not sure it's a bug. In the normal course of events would one open a new document and an ERT box then leave them both empty and unsaved while opening a second document? I fail to see the

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread Geoffrey Lloyd
I also dont feel it is a bug. Once you actually return to the original document (with the open ERT window) and type anywhere the text disappears (on my win32 setup at least) and the box returns to its empty state (albeit with what you just typed in it!) I think this is a pointing device

Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread Paul Smith
Dear All I would like to ask you for confirming the following bug, which can be reproduced in the following way: * open a new document and open an empty ERT, keeping the ERT and the document open; * open a different document and selecting something therein; * return to the first document and

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread John Coppens
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:26:07 +0100 Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear All > > I would like to ask you for confirming the following bug, which can be > reproduced in the following way: > > * open a new document and open an empty ERT, keeping the ERT and the > document open; > * open a

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 04:26:07PM +0100, Paul Smith wrote: > * open a new document and open an empty ERT, keeping the ERT and the > document open; > * open a different document and selecting something therein; > * return to the first document and look at the open ERT. Please file a bug on

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread Eugenio Guevara
- Original Message - From: "John Coppens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:02 AM Subject: Re: Asking for confirming a bug > On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:26:07 +0100 > Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread Angus Leeming
John Coppens wrote: >> Dear All >> >> I would like to ask you for confirming the following bug, which can be >> reproduced in the following way: >> >> * open a new document and open an empty ERT, keeping the ERT and the >> document open; >> * open a different document and selecting something

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:15:36 +0100, Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I would like to ask you for confirming the following bug, which can be > >> reproduced in the following way: > >> > >> * open a new document and open an empty ERT, keeping the ERT and the > >> document open; > >> *

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread Rich Shepard
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, John Coppens wrote: Same problem here, 1.3.5 on Slackware. I, too, see this. But, I'm not sure it's a bug. In the normal course of events would one open a new document and an ERT box then leave them both empty and unsaved while opening a second document? I fail to see the

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2005-03-29 Thread Geoffrey Lloyd
I also dont feel it is a bug. Once you actually return to the original document (with the open ERT window) and type anywhere the text disappears (on my win32 setup at least) and the box returns to its empty state (albeit with what you just typed in it!) I think this is a pointing device

Asking for confirming a bug

2004-11-14 Thread Paul Smith
Dear All I have recently added a new file format and the respective converter (in preferences). However, whenever I start LyX, I can only see the new format (View -- PDF4). To see the other formats, I have to reconfigure. So, I need to reconfigure LyX whenever I start it. Do other confirm this

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2004-11-14 Thread Paul Smith
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 15:00:03 +, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have recently added a new file format and the respective converter (in preferences). However, whenever I start LyX, I can only see the new format (View -- PDF4). To see the other formats, I have to reconfigure. So, I

Asking for confirming a bug

2004-11-14 Thread Paul Smith
Dear All I have recently added a new file format and the respective converter (in preferences). However, whenever I start LyX, I can only see the new format (View -- PDF4). To see the other formats, I have to reconfigure. So, I need to reconfigure LyX whenever I start it. Do other confirm this

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2004-11-14 Thread Paul Smith
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 15:00:03 +, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have recently added a new file format and the respective converter (in preferences). However, whenever I start LyX, I can only see the new format (View -- PDF4). To see the other formats, I have to reconfigure. So, I

Asking for confirming a bug

2004-11-14 Thread Paul Smith
Dear All I have recently added a new file format and the respective converter (in preferences). However, whenever I start LyX, I can only see the new format (View --> PDF4). To see the other formats, I have to reconfigure. So, I need to reconfigure LyX whenever I start it. Do other confirm this

Re: Asking for confirming a bug

2004-11-14 Thread Paul Smith
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 15:00:03 +, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have recently added a new file format and the respective converter > (in preferences). However, whenever I start LyX, I can only see the > new format (View --> PDF4). To see the other formats, I have to > reconfigure.