On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:44:49PM -0430, Julio Rojas wrote:
Guys, don't you believe your investing way too much time in this line of
problems? :)
It's for the first time in ten years or so. So that's a relatively minor
portion of the developers time.
Comparable, for instance, with the time
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Guys, don't you believe your investing way too much time in this line of
problems? :)
It's for the first time in ten years or so. So that's a relatively minor
portion of the developers time.
It's also spring cleaning time, so why not clean the
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Guys, don't you believe your investing way too much time in this
line of
problems? :)
It's for the first time in ten years or so. So that's a relatively minor
portion of the developers time.
It's also spring cleaning time,
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Guys, don't you believe your investing way too much time in this
line of
problems? :)
It's for the first time in ten years or so. So that's a relatively
minor
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:44:49PM -0430, Julio Rojas wrote:
Guys, don't you believe your investing way too much time in this line of
problems? :)
It's for the first time in ten years or so. So that's a relatively minor
portion of the developers time.
Comparable, for instance, with the time
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Guys, don't you believe your investing way too much time in this line of
problems? :)
It's for the first time in ten years or so. So that's a relatively minor
portion of the developers time.
It's also spring cleaning time, so why not clean the
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Guys, don't you believe your investing way too much time in this
line of
problems? :)
It's for the first time in ten years or so. So that's a relatively minor
portion of the developers time.
It's also spring cleaning time,
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Guys, don't you believe your investing way too much time in this
line of
problems? :)
It's for the first time in ten years or so. So that's a relatively
minor
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:44:49PM -0430, Julio Rojas wrote:
> Guys, don't you believe your "investing" way too much time in this line of
> "problems"? :)
It's for the first time in ten years or so. So that's a relatively minor
portion of the developers time.
Comparable, for instance, with the
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Guys, don't you believe your "investing" way too much time in this line of
"problems"? :)
It's for the first time in ten years or so. So that's a relatively minor
portion of the developers time.
It's also spring cleaning time, so why not clean
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Guys, don't you believe your "investing" way too much time in this
line of
"problems"? :)
It's for the first time in ten years or so. So that's a relatively minor
portion of the developers time.
It's also spring cleaning
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Guys, don't you believe your "investing" way too much time in this
> > line of
> > "problems"? :)
> It's for the first time in ten years or so. So that's a relatively
>
I think this whole thread started with Steve's provocative statement that
LyX isn't WYSIWYG, and he wished that it was. And, WYSIWYM is too obtuse and
confusing. So, I have a suggestion:
Why not adapt Leslie Lamport's LaTeX description: A Document Preparation
System? That removes all
Guys, don't you believe your investing way too much time in this line of
problems? :)
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think this whole thread started with Steve's provocative statement
that
LyX isn't WYSIWYG, and he wished that it was. And, WYSIWYM
I think this whole thread started with Steve's provocative statement that
LyX isn't WYSIWYG, and he wished that it was. And, WYSIWYM is too obtuse and
confusing. So, I have a suggestion:
Why not adapt Leslie Lamport's LaTeX description: A Document Preparation
System? That removes all
Guys, don't you believe your investing way too much time in this line of
problems? :)
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think this whole thread started with Steve's provocative statement
that
LyX isn't WYSIWYG, and he wished that it was. And, WYSIWYM
I think this whole thread started with Steve's provocative statement that
LyX isn't WYSIWYG, and he wished that it was. And, WYSIWYM is too obtuse and
confusing. So, I have a suggestion:
Why not adapt Leslie Lamport's LaTeX description: "A Document Preparation
System?" That removes all
Guys, don't you believe your "investing" way too much time in this line of
"problems"? :)
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I think this whole thread started with Steve's provocative statement
> that
> LyX isn't WYSIWYG, and he wished that it was. And,
18 matches
Mail list logo
