On 29.08.2008, at 20:12, Georg Baum wrote:
Both problems would be fixed by a sane parameter handling that would
not
store all parameters in one string, but one parameter after the
other in
the .lyx file. Preservation of order would then be easy to implement
as
well.
If you prefer I will
Daniel Lohmann wrote:
> Actually, I had searched bugzilla and found bug 4884 before asking on
> the list, but to me it does not really describe the problem of
> sorting. Now after re-reading the entry I see that it is somewhat
> related, but that is not really obvious.
Yes, the problem in bugzi
On 27.08.2008, at 19:59, Georg Baum wrote:
Daniel Lohmann wrote:
Hi,
I just discovered a "feature" of the listings inset that actually
should be considered as a bug: Additional options given on the
advanced page are implicitly sorted alphabetically. However, if using
listing styles, the orde
Daniel Lohmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just discovered a "feature" of the listings inset that actually
> should be considered as a bug: Additional options given on the
> advanced page are implicitly sorted alphabetically. However, if using
> listing styles, the order of options is relevant. Consider t
Hi,
I just discovered a "feature" of the listings inset that actually
should be considered as a bug: Additional options given on the
advanced page are implicitly sorted alphabetically. However, if using
listing styles, the order of options is relevant. Consider the
following example:
In
