Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi, I know this is an old mail, but I am bringing it back up because it reminds me of the Devanagari package. I'm trying to get CJK working on my own using your instructions, Marc, and I can't get it to work, I just get tons of errors. Could you include a test file that I can look at? Also this

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-04-25 Thread Marc Flerackers
Stacia Hartleben wrote: Hi, I know this is an old mail, but I am bringing it back up because it reminds me of the Devanagari package. I'm trying to get CJK working on my own using your instructions, Marc, and I can't get it to work, I just get tons of errors. Could you include a test file that I

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi, I know this is an old mail, but I am bringing it back up because it reminds me of the Devanagari package. I'm trying to get CJK working on my own using your instructions, Marc, and I can't get it to work, I just get tons of errors. Could you include a test file that I can look at? Also this

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-04-25 Thread Marc Flerackers
Stacia Hartleben wrote: Hi, I know this is an old mail, but I am bringing it back up because it reminds me of the Devanagari package. I'm trying to get CJK working on my own using your instructions, Marc, and I can't get it to work, I just get tons of errors. Could you include a test file that I

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-04-25 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Hi, I know this is an old mail, but I am bringing it back up because it reminds me of the Devanagari package. I'm trying to get CJK working on my own using your instructions, Marc, and I can't get it to work, I just get tons of errors. Could you include a test file that I can look at? Also this

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-04-25 Thread Marc Flerackers
Stacia Hartleben wrote: Hi, I know this is an old mail, but I am bringing it back up because it reminds me of the Devanagari package. I'm trying to get CJK working on my own using your instructions, Marc, and I can't get it to work, I just get tons of errors. Could you include a test file that I

CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-03-30 Thread Marc Flerackers
When setting the document encoding to utf8 I can paste Japanese from other programs like Firefox. The Japanese characters are displayed correctly, and I add \usepackage{CJK} to the preamble and put a \begin{CJK}{UTF8}{ipam} and \end{CJK} around the charecters so they are rendered correctly to

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-03-30 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Let me know how you progress and maybe post this on http://bugzilla.lyx.org . That would be amazing if CJK was working...maybe support for the CJK package could be added so you don't have to put something around every character. On 3/30/07, Marc Flerackers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When setting

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-03-30 Thread Angus Leeming
Marc Flerackers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: However I can only render my document manually by exporting to latex and running latex and bibtex, as lyx seems to crash on an exception when pressing the render button: Hi, Marc. Could you repost this to the lyx-devel list. Given that you're

CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-03-30 Thread Marc Flerackers
When setting the document encoding to utf8 I can paste Japanese from other programs like Firefox. The Japanese characters are displayed correctly, and I add \usepackage{CJK} to the preamble and put a \begin{CJK}{UTF8}{ipam} and \end{CJK} around the charecters so they are rendered correctly to

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-03-30 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Let me know how you progress and maybe post this on http://bugzilla.lyx.org . That would be amazing if CJK was working...maybe support for the CJK package could be added so you don't have to put something around every character. On 3/30/07, Marc Flerackers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When setting

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-03-30 Thread Angus Leeming
Marc Flerackers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: However I can only render my document manually by exporting to latex and running latex and bibtex, as lyx seems to crash on an exception when pressing the render button: Hi, Marc. Could you repost this to the lyx-devel list. Given that you're

CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-03-30 Thread Marc Flerackers
When setting the document encoding to utf8 I can paste Japanese from other programs like Firefox. The Japanese characters are displayed correctly, and I add \usepackage{CJK} to the preamble and put a \begin{CJK}{UTF8}{ipam} and \end{CJK} around the charecters so they are rendered correctly to

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-03-30 Thread Stacia Hartleben
Let me know how you progress and maybe post this on http://bugzilla.lyx.org . That would be amazing if CJK was working...maybe support for the CJK package could be added so you don't have to put something around every character. On 3/30/07, Marc Flerackers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: When

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

2007-03-30 Thread Angus Leeming
Marc Flerackers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However I can only render my document > manually by exporting to latex and running latex and bibtex, as lyx > seems to crash on an exception when pressing the render button: Hi, Marc. Could you repost this to the lyx-devel list. Given that you're