On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 07:31:03PM +0200, Detlev Humann wrote:
Maybe there is a hidden package for changing the footnote indentation?
Thanks for answering steadily!
\usepackage[marginal]{footmisc}
Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 07:31:03PM +0200, Detlev Humann wrote:
Maybe there is a hidden package for changing the footnote indentation?
Thanks for answering steadily!
\usepackage[marginal]{footmisc}
this looks ugly ...
Herbert
--
Cheers! Herbert got the solution! For all Lyx users
who want their footnote indentation to look like this:
text
--
1 bla bla bla bla bla bla
bla bla bla.
2 bla.
For Lyx 1.1.5 (I tested) write in latex preamble:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 07:31:03PM +0200, Detlev Humann wrote:
Maybe there is a hidden package for changing the footnote indentation?
Thanks for answering steadily!
\usepackage[marginal]{footmisc}
Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 07:31:03PM +0200, Detlev Humann wrote:
Maybe there is a hidden package for changing the footnote indentation?
Thanks for answering steadily!
\usepackage[marginal]{footmisc}
this looks ugly ...
Herbert
--
Cheers! Herbert got the solution! For all Lyx users
who want their footnote indentation to look like this:
text
--
1 bla bla bla bla bla bla
bla bla bla.
2 bla.
For Lyx 1.1.5 (I tested) write in latex preamble:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 07:31:03PM +0200, Detlev Humann wrote:
> Maybe there is a hidden package for changing the footnote indentation?
> Thanks for answering steadily!
\usepackage[marginal]{footmisc}
Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 07:31:03PM +0200, Detlev Humann wrote:
> > Maybe there is a hidden package for changing the footnote indentation?
> > Thanks for answering steadily!
>
> \usepackage[marginal]{footmisc}
this looks ugly ...
Herbert
--
{\columnwidth -\myFootnoteLabel}{#1}%}
And the former problem that a footnote appeared on the next page is
solved, too.
Additionally, AFAIK, footnotes aren't split anymore.
Maybe Herbert takes this solution on his website?! :-)
Thanks again!
Detlev
Detlev Humann wrote:
Detlev Humann wrote:
(I know that Lyx/Latex sometimes splits a footnote over two pages,
which isn´t very nice but acceptable. However, this is not my problem
as I have interfootnotelinepenalty=1 in Latex preamble. The
strange thing in my case is that
Detlev Humann wrote:
(I know that Lyx/Latex sometimes splits a footnote over two pages,
which isn´t very nice but acceptable. However, this is not my
problem
as I have interfootnotelinepenalty=1 in Latex preamble. The
strange thing in my case is that it doesn´t make a
Detlev Humann wrote:
delte the whole latex preamble and all should work.
Well, that seems to be a radical solution. (I already tried that to find out
the reason for the behaviour.)
If I delete the whole preamble then my redefined footnote indentation gets
lost and I get a split
\interfootnotelinepenalty=1
is possible
it was your redefinition makefntext
HErbert
Sorry for one more email:
Did I get you right that there is only one alternative (((ok, latinists know
that there is always one alternative))):
Either my indentation and footnotes appear sometimes
Detlev Humann wrote:
Detlev Humann wrote:
(I know that Lyx/Latex sometimes splits a footnote over two pages,
which isn´t very nice but acceptable. However, this is not my problem
as I have interfootnotelinepenalty=1 in Latex preamble. The
strange thing in my case is that
Detlev Humann wrote:
(I know that Lyx/Latex sometimes splits a footnote over two pages,
which isn´t very nice but acceptable. However, this is not my
problem
as I have interfootnotelinepenalty=1 in Latex preamble. The
strange thing in my case is that it doesn´t make a
Detlev Humann wrote:
delte the whole latex preamble and all should work.
Well, that seems to be a radical solution. (I already tried that to find out
the reason for the behaviour.)
If I delete the whole preamble then my redefined footnote indentation gets
lost and I get a split
\interfootnotelinepenalty=1
is possible
it was your redefinition makefntext
HErbert
Sorry for one more email:
Did I get you right that there is only one alternative (((ok, latinists know
that there is always one alternative))):
Either my indentation and footnotes appear sometimes
Detlev Humann wrote:
>
> > > Detlev Humann wrote:
> > >
> > > (I know that Lyx/Latex sometimes splits a footnote over two pages,
> > > which isn´t very nice but acceptable. However, this is not my problem
> > > as I have interfootnotelinepenalty=1 in Latex preamble. The
> > > strange thing
> > > > Detlev Humann wrote:
> > > >
> > > > (I know that Lyx/Latex sometimes splits a footnote over two pages,
> > > > which isn´t very nice but acceptable. However, this is not my
problem
> > > > as I have interfootnotelinepenalty=1 in Latex preamble. The
> > > > strange thing in my case is
Detlev Humann wrote:
>
> >
> > delte the whole latex preamble and all should work.
> >
> Well, that seems to be a radical solution. (I already tried that to find out
> the reason for the behaviour.)
> If I delete the whole preamble then my redefined footnote indentation gets
> lost and I get a
> \interfootnotelinepenalty=1
>
> is possible
>
> it was your redefinition makefntext
>
> HErbert
>
Sorry for one more email:
Did I get you right that there is only one alternative (((ok, latinists know
that there is always one alternative))):
Either my indentation and footnotes appear
Hi!
My problem is that Lyx/Latexputs the footnote
mark(=number) correctly in the text of one page, but the footnote text (with
correct footnote number of course) appears on the bottom of
the_next_page.
(I know that Lyx/Latex sometimes splits a footnote
over two pages, which isn´tvery nice
Detlev Humann wrote:
(I know that Lyx/Latex sometimes splits a footnote over two pages,
which isn´t very nice but acceptable. However, this is not my problem
as I have interfootnotelinepenalty=1 in Latex preamble. The
strange thing in my case is that it doesn´t make a difference if I
Hi!
My problem is that Lyx/Latexputs the footnote
mark(=number) correctly in the text of one page, but the footnote text (with
correct footnote number of course) appears on the bottom of
the_next_page.
(I know that Lyx/Latex sometimes splits a footnote
over two pages, which isn´tvery nice
Detlev Humann wrote:
(I know that Lyx/Latex sometimes splits a footnote over two pages,
which isn´t very nice but acceptable. However, this is not my problem
as I have interfootnotelinepenalty=1 in Latex preamble. The
strange thing in my case is that it doesn´t make a difference if I
Hi!
My problem is that Lyx/Latex puts the footnote
mark(=number) correctly in the text of one page, but the footnote text (with
correct footnote number of course) appears on the bottom of
the_next_page.
(I know that Lyx/Latex sometimes splits a footnote
over two pages, which isn´t very nice
> Detlev Humann wrote:
>
> (I know that Lyx/Latex sometimes splits a footnote over two pages,
> which isn´t very nice but acceptable. However, this is not my problem
> as I have interfootnotelinepenalty=1 in Latex preamble. The
> strange thing in my case is that it doesn´t make a difference
27 matches
Mail list logo
