Re: Footnote problem with 1.20

2002-05-09 Thread Herbert Voss
Max Bian wrote: The attached files contain one lyx file showing a footnote problem. The .tex file is the exported latex. I noticed that some codes are inserted: %% LyX specific LaTeX commands.

Re: Footnote problem with 1.20

2002-05-09 Thread Max Bian
The problem is fixed. After reviewing the changes you made in the files, I guess it was a problem with the citation references in the footnote. It is quite surprising because I have put references in foot in other articles (1.16fix4 and earlier versions) and I don't remember any case I need

Re: Footnote problem with 1.20

2002-05-09 Thread Herbert Voss
Max Bian wrote: The attached files contain one lyx file showing a footnote problem. The .tex file is the exported latex. I noticed that some codes are inserted: %% LyX specific LaTeX commands.

Re: Footnote problem with 1.20

2002-05-09 Thread Max Bian
The problem is fixed. After reviewing the changes you made in the files, I guess it was a problem with the citation references in the footnote. It is quite surprising because I have put references in foot in other articles (1.16fix4 and earlier versions) and I don't remember any case I need

Re: Footnote problem with 1.20

2002-05-09 Thread Herbert Voss
Max Bian wrote: > The attached files contain one lyx file showing a footnote problem. The > .tex file is the exported latex. > > I noticed that some codes are inserted: > > %% LyX specific LaTeX commands. >

Re: Footnote problem with 1.20

2002-05-09 Thread Max Bian
The problem is fixed. After reviewing the changes you made in the files, I guess it was a problem with the citation references in the footnote. It is quite surprising because I have put references in foot in other articles (1.16fix4 and earlier versions) and I don't remember any case I need