On 12/6/22 12:57, Dan wrote:
I'm writing what is essentially going to be a small text in Physics
with a lot of high end Mathematics, so a good Science grammar checker
would be a nice idea. I found the LyX wiki and the lyx-cg system.
This was created by a user and sometime contributor. I'm not
I'm writing what is essentially going to be a small text in Physics with a
lot of high end Mathematics, so a good Science grammar checker would be a
nice idea. I found the LyX wiki and the lyx-cg system. Are there other
options? I'm also looking at Grammarly but I'm not sure it can handle the
ki
uggestions?
>
> Last century I tried MSWord's grammar checker. I found it a great idea
> impossible to implement. It would often let fly sentences with a wrong
> word, and worse yet, it would flag lots of sentences that any author
> would feel good about writing.
>
> I think
d it a great idea
> impossible to implement. It would often let fly sentences with a wrong
> word, and worse yet, it would flag lots of sentences that any author
> would feel good about writing.
>
> I think that, once you get past absolutely horrible grammar, grammar
> checking beco
ny author
would feel good about writing.
I think that, once you get past absolutely horrible grammar, grammar
checking becomes nothing but frustration.
I mentioned MSWord, which is obviously bad software, but I really think
it's impossible to implement a useful grammar checker with the cur
Hello,
lyx offers a language checker, but not a grammar checker.
I installed the check-Tex option, but the results are not convincing (at least
in English). The suggestion are really poor.
Is there any way to install a more efficient grammar checker?
To circumvent the problem, I used to generate a
