On Wednesday 07 June 2006 02:04, Stephen Harris wrote:
Jose' Matos wrote:
Things have improved a lot meanwhile. It is on my plans to have a ready
to go system for fedora as, I am sure, there are for other linux
distributions.
You know best! Is there an objective method used in
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 02:29, David Neeley wrote:
There are a number of package/installation systems in Linux--perhaps
as we get true Linux Standard Base-compliant we can settle those down
a great deal! I have also heard good things about yum (making up for
some of the rpm deficiencies);
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 02:04, Stephen Harris wrote:
Jose' Matos wrote:
Things have improved a lot meanwhile. It is on my plans to have a ready
to go system for fedora as, I am sure, there are for other linux
distributions.
You know best! Is there an objective method used in
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 02:29, David Neeley wrote:
There are a number of package/installation systems in Linux--perhaps
as we get true Linux Standard Base-compliant we can settle those down
a great deal! I have also heard good things about yum (making up for
some of the rpm deficiencies);
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 02:04, Stephen Harris wrote:
> Jose' Matos wrote:
> >
> > Things have improved a lot meanwhile. It is on my plans to have a ready
> > to go system for fedora as, I am sure, there are for other linux
> > distributions.
>
> You know best! Is there an objective method used
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 02:29, David Neeley wrote:
> There are a number of package/installation systems in Linux--perhaps
> as we get true Linux Standard Base-compliant we can settle those down
> a great deal! I have also heard good things about yum (making up for
> some of the rpm
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 01:52, Stephen Harris wrote:
SH: The Docbook topic comes up occasionally. Chris Karakas
has done quite a bit of work producing with LyX, SGML, and
Latex. http://www.karakas-online.de/mySGML/ There is quite
a bit involved to get all the packages working together IMO.
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 01:52, Stephen Harris wrote:
SH: The Docbook topic comes up occasionally. Chris Karakas
has done quite a bit of work producing with LyX, SGML, and
Latex. http://www.karakas-online.de/mySGML/ There is quite
a bit involved to get all the packages working
In my view, it would be just as well if the xforms front end were
discarded in favor of one using the GTK libraries (used by Gnome,
originating from the GIMP work IIRC).
I have not met anyone in some years using *any* version of Linux that
did not have at least qt or gtk, in most cases both,
In my view, it would be just as well if the xforms front end were
discarded in favor of one using the GTK libraries (used by Gnome,
originating from the GIMP work IIRC).
I have not met anyone in some years using *any* version of Linux that
did not have at least qt or gtk, in most cases both,
David Neeley wrote:
Personally, I have a clear preference for kde, so the qt interface is
fine by me! ...
I do to. They have a 3.14 package for Cygwin. But I've just read
that a new version of KDE came out May31,06 3.53? so 3.14 is too old.
Also they are going to make a native port using Qt4
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 01:52, Stephen Harris wrote:
SH: The Docbook topic comes up occasionally. Chris Karakas
has done quite a bit of work producing with LyX, SGML, and
Latex. http://www.karakas-online.de/mySGML/ There is quite
a bit involved to get all the packages working together IMO.
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 01:52, Stephen Harris wrote:
SH: The Docbook topic comes up occasionally. Chris Karakas
has done quite a bit of work producing with LyX, SGML, and
Latex. http://www.karakas-online.de/mySGML/ There is quite
a bit involved to get all the packages working
In my view, it would be just as well if the xforms front end were
discarded in favor of one using the GTK libraries (used by Gnome,
originating from the GIMP work IIRC).
I have not met anyone in some years using *any* version of Linux that
did not have at least qt or gtk, in most cases both,
In my view, it would be just as well if the xforms front end were
discarded in favor of one using the GTK libraries (used by Gnome,
originating from the GIMP work IIRC).
I have not met anyone in some years using *any* version of Linux that
did not have at least qt or gtk, in most cases both,
David Neeley wrote:
Personally, I have a clear preference for kde, so the qt interface is
fine by me! ...
I do to. They have a 3.14 package for Cygwin. But I've just read
that a new version of KDE came out May31,06 3.53? so 3.14 is too old.
Also they are going to make a native port using Qt4
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 01:52, Stephen Harris wrote:
> SH: The Docbook topic comes up occasionally. Chris Karakas
> has done quite a bit of work producing with LyX, SGML, and
> Latex. http://www.karakas-online.de/mySGML/ There is quite
> a bit involved to get all the packages working together IMO.
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 01:52, Stephen Harris wrote:
SH: The Docbook topic comes up occasionally. Chris Karakas
has done quite a bit of work producing with LyX, SGML, and
Latex. http://www.karakas-online.de/mySGML/ There is quite
a bit involved to get all the packages working
In my view, it would be just as well if the xforms front end were
discarded in favor of one using the GTK libraries (used by Gnome,
originating from the GIMP work IIRC).
I have not met anyone in some years using *any* version of Linux that
did not have at least qt or gtk, in most cases both,
In my view, it would be just as well if the xforms front end were
discarded in favor of one using the GTK libraries (used by Gnome,
originating from the GIMP work IIRC).
I have not met anyone in some years using *any* version of Linux that
did not have at least qt or gtk, in most cases both,
David Neeley wrote:
Personally, I have a clear preference for kde, so the qt interface is
fine by me! ...
I do to. They have a 3.14 package for Cygwin. But I've just read
that a new version of KDE came out May31,06 3.53? so 3.14 is too old.
Also they are going to make a native port using Qt4
David Neeley wrote:
I am trying to get far enough up the learning curve with LyX that I
can feel good about creating style files. Then, I intend to do a style
file for DITA--because I believe that LyX is, potentially, a far
better tech writing solution than anything else out there at the
Yes, this is a topic I have been interested in for some years.
Creating documentation as a specialty seems an ideal use for LyX--at
least, as it may become in future.
One notion that becomes very important in document creation, updating,
and management in general is the notion of chunking into
David Neeley wrote:
I delayed turning to LyX for several years, since for a time it
appeared to the casual observer to be somewhat of a dying application.
An aborted Klyx (kde specific) version, for example, did not appear
to be a sign of progress.
http://www.lyx.org/about/klyx.php
While
David Neeley wrote:
I am trying to get far enough up the learning curve with LyX that I
can feel good about creating style files. Then, I intend to do a style
file for DITA--because I believe that LyX is, potentially, a far
better tech writing solution than anything else out there at the
Yes, this is a topic I have been interested in for some years.
Creating documentation as a specialty seems an ideal use for LyX--at
least, as it may become in future.
One notion that becomes very important in document creation, updating,
and management in general is the notion of chunking into
David Neeley wrote:
I delayed turning to LyX for several years, since for a time it
appeared to the casual observer to be somewhat of a dying application.
An aborted Klyx (kde specific) version, for example, did not appear
to be a sign of progress.
http://www.lyx.org/about/klyx.php
While
David Neeley wrote:
I am trying to get far enough up the learning curve with LyX that I
can feel good about creating style files. Then, I intend to do a style
file for DITA--because I believe that LyX is, potentially, a far
better tech writing solution than anything else out there at the
Yes, this is a topic I have been interested in for some years.
Creating documentation as a specialty seems an ideal use for LyX--at
least, as it may become in future.
One notion that becomes very important in document creation, updating,
and management in general is the notion of "chunking" into
David Neeley wrote:
I delayed turning to LyX for several years, since for a time it
appeared to the casual observer to be somewhat of a dying application.
An aborted "Klyx" (kde specific) version, for example, did not appear
to be a sign of progress.
http://www.lyx.org/about/klyx.php
30 matches
Mail list logo
