On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 09:12:40AM +0200, UD Kap wrote:
> This is great, Paul-- I installed the fonts as you described and now
> everything is fine. Not clear why it wasn't done by default. Later
I know nothing about PPA, maybe the dependencies are set wrongly?
I normal debian/ubuntu fonts-lyx
This is great, Paul-- I installed the fonts as you described and now
everything is fine. Not clear why it wasn't done by default. Later I'll
try the Texlive PPA too.
Thanks a lot--
Ehud
On 4/27/19 2:12 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
On 4/26/19 5:17 PM, UD Kap wrote:
Thank you all for your
On 4/26/19 5:17 PM, UD Kap wrote:
Thank you all for your speedy responses.
I suspect that Pavel has fingered it-- I don't see any LYX folder in
the /usr/share/fonts folder.
At least on Mint, there is no .../lyx folder there.
The problem is on the Lyx screen-- the output looks OK. I
something REALLY silly, but my Lyx (2.3.2, running
under Linux Mint-XFCE) refuses to show integrals, pi, etc.
Instead, it shows some other symbols (O with an accent for integral,
bold letter P for \pi, etc.).
Wrong font or wrong font encoding.
Latex works fine-- if I use ERT in Lyx
or Texworks
On 4/25/19 11:48 PM, UD Kap wrote:
I am sure I am doing something REALLY silly, but my Lyx (2.3.2,
running under Linux Mint-XFCE) refuses to show integrals, pi, etc.
Instead, it shows some other symbols (O with an accent for integral,
bold letter P for \pi, etc.). Latex works fine-- if I use
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 07:46:00AM -, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2019-04-26, UD Kap wrote:
> > I am sure I am doing something REALLY silly, but my Lyx (2.3.2, running
> > under Linux Mint-XFCE) refuses to show integrals, pi, etc.
> > Instead, it shows some other symb
On 2019-04-26, UD Kap wrote:
> I am sure I am doing something REALLY silly, but my Lyx (2.3.2, running
> under Linux Mint-XFCE) refuses to show integrals, pi, etc.
> Instead, it shows some other symbols (O with an accent for integral,
> bold letter P for \pi, etc.).
Wrong font o
I am sure I am doing something REALLY silly, but my Lyx (2.3.2, running
under Linux Mint-XFCE) refuses to show integrals, pi, etc. Instead, it
shows some other symbols (O with an accent for integral, bold letter P
for \pi, etc.). Latex works fine-- if I use ERT in Lyx or Texworks
without Lyx
On 04/20/2014 02:21 PM, Jonas J. wrote:
When i create something like a limes integral series,... i have no
input fields available to enter any index variable. i use the standard
formel editor in Lyx. What do i do wrong? Thank you!
If you want to enter indices, try hitting ^ and _
On 04/20/2014 02:21 PM, Jonas J. wrote:
When i create something like a limes integral series,... i have no
input fields available to enter any index variable. i use the standard
formel editor in Lyx. What do i do wrong? Thank you!
If you want to enter indices, try hitting ^ and _
On 04/20/2014 02:21 PM, Jonas J. wrote:
When i create something like a limes integral series,... i have no
input fields available to enter any index variable. i use the standard
formel editor in Lyx. What do i do wrong? Thank you!
If you want to enter indices, try hitting ^ and _
When i create something like a limes integral series,... i have no input fields
available to enter any index variable. i use the standard formel editor in Lyx.
What do i do wrong? Thank you!
When i create something like a limes integral series,... i have no input fields
available to enter any index variable. i use the standard formel editor in Lyx.
What do i do wrong? Thank you!
When i create something like a limes integral series,... i have no input fields
available to enter any index variable. i use the standard formel editor in Lyx.
What do i do wrong? Thank you!
In lyx, how does one make the vertical bar or line that indicates evaluation
of an indefinite integral at 2 endpoints to calculate a definite integral?
I would think it should be a big op since integration is, but I could not find
it on that menu.
--
Paul Elliott
Hello,
Paul Elliott wrote:
In lyx, how does one make the vertical bar or line that indicates evaluation
of an indefinite integral at 2 endpoints to calculate a definite integral?
I would think it should be a big op since integration is, but I could not
find
it on that menu.
What about
In lyx, how does one make the vertical bar or line that indicates evaluation
of an indefinite integral at 2 endpoints to calculate a definite integral?
I would think it should be a big op since integration is, but I could not find
it on that menu.
--
Paul Elliott
Hello,
Paul Elliott wrote:
In lyx, how does one make the vertical bar or line that indicates evaluation
of an indefinite integral at 2 endpoints to calculate a definite integral?
I would think it should be a big op since integration is, but I could not
find
it on that menu.
What about
In lyx, how does one make the vertical bar or line that indicates evaluation
of an indefinite integral at 2 endpoints to calculate a definite integral?
I would think it should be a big op since integration is, but I could not find
it on that menu.
--
Paul Elliott
Hello,
Paul Elliott wrote:
> In lyx, how does one make the vertical bar or line that indicates evaluation
> of an indefinite integral at 2 endpoints to calculate a definite integral?
>
> I would think it should be a big op since integration is, but I could not
> find
> it on that menu.
>
. However, some
thing are not shown in the equations (in the Lyx editor):
integrals, summation signs, etc.
Have I neglected to install anything?
Did you install latex-xft-fonts?
It is generally a good idea to install all recommended packages (unless
you are sure that you do not need
. However, some
thing are not shown in the equations (in the Lyx editor):
integrals, summation signs, etc.
Have I neglected to install anything?
Did you install latex-xft-fonts?
It is generally a good idea to install all recommended packages (unless
you are sure that you do not need
. However, some
thing are not shown in the equations (in the Lyx editor):
integrals, summation signs, etc.
Have I neglected to install anything?
Did you install latex-xft-fonts?
It is generally a good idea to install all "recommended" packages (unless
you are sure that you d
I have installed Lyx 1.6.1 on a kubuntu 64 bit (Version 8.10).
It seems to work fine, and produce correct pdf output. However, some
thing are not shown in the equations (in the Lyx editor):
integrals, summation signs, etc.
Have I neglected to install anything? I have used dpkg to install
On 2009-03-05, Ehud Kaplan wrote:
I have installed Lyx 1.6.1 on a kubuntu 64 bit (Version 8.10).
It seems to work fine, and produce correct pdf output. However, some
thing are not shown in the equations (in the Lyx editor):
integrals, summation signs, etc.
Have I neglected to install
I have installed Lyx 1.6.1 on a kubuntu 64 bit (Version 8.10).
It seems to work fine, and produce correct pdf output. However, some
thing are not shown in the equations (in the Lyx editor):
integrals, summation signs, etc.
Have I neglected to install anything? I have used dpkg to install
On 2009-03-05, Ehud Kaplan wrote:
I have installed Lyx 1.6.1 on a kubuntu 64 bit (Version 8.10).
It seems to work fine, and produce correct pdf output. However, some
thing are not shown in the equations (in the Lyx editor):
integrals, summation signs, etc.
Have I neglected to install
I have installed Lyx 1.6.1 on a kubuntu 64 bit (Version 8.10).
It seems to work fine, and produce correct pdf output. However, some
thing are not shown in the equations (in the Lyx editor):
integrals, summation signs, etc.
Have I neglected to install anything? I have used dpkg to install
On 2009-03-05, Ehud Kaplan wrote:
> I have installed Lyx 1.6.1 on a kubuntu 64 bit (Version 8.10).
> It seems to work fine, and produce correct pdf output. However, some
> thing are not shown in the equations (in the Lyx editor):
> integrals, summation signs, etc.
> Have I negle
I am using LyX 1.5 (beta3) on Windows XP.
When compiling the DVI of a paper with some integrals, I received an error
because of the lack of the esint.sty.
Then, I have installed the package but in the DVI the integral is
substituted by a capital delta (\Delta).
Any suggestion?
Thanks
On 5/20/07, Francesco Menoncin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using LyX 1.5 (beta3) on Windows XP.
When compiling the DVI of a paper with some integrals, I received an error
because of the lack of the esint.sty.
Then, I have installed the package but in the DVI the integral is
substituted
I am using LyX 1.5 (beta3) on Windows XP.
When compiling the DVI of a paper with some integrals, I received an error
because of the lack of the esint.sty.
Then, I have installed the package but in the DVI the integral is
substituted by a capital delta (\Delta).
Any suggestion?
Thanks
On 5/20/07, Francesco Menoncin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using LyX 1.5 (beta3) on Windows XP.
When compiling the DVI of a paper with some integrals, I received an error
because of the lack of the esint.sty.
Then, I have installed the package but in the DVI the integral is
substituted
I am using LyX 1.5 (beta3) on Windows XP.
When compiling the DVI of a paper with some integrals, I received an error
because of the lack of the esint.sty.
Then, I have installed the package but in the DVI the integral is
substituted by a capital delta (\Delta).
Any suggestion?
Thanks
On 5/20/07, Francesco Menoncin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am using LyX 1.5 (beta3) on Windows XP.
When compiling the DVI of a paper with some integrals, I received an error
because of the lack of the esint.sty.
Then, I have installed the package but in the DVI the integral is
subst
Hi all,
I would like to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below the
integral sign, as in the first example of the attached figure.
How do I do this using LyX?
I can't find any button in the Math Panel the performs this task, is there
any?
I have only suceeded in writing
On 6/17/06, Andreas Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below the
integral sign, as in the first example of the attached figure.
Write
\int\limits _{a}^{b}f\left(x\right)dx
and select it, and then crtl+m.
Paul
Paul Smith wrote:
Write
\int\limits _{a}^{b}f\left(x\right)dx
and select it, and then crtl+m.
Alternatively set the cursor behind the integral in the formula and use
then the menu Edit - Math - Change Limits Type
regards Uwe
Hi all,
I would like to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below the
integral sign, as in the first example of the attached figure.
How do I do this using LyX?
I can't find any button in the Math Panel the performs this task, is there
any?
I have only suceeded in writing
On 6/17/06, Andreas Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below the
integral sign, as in the first example of the attached figure.
Write
\int\limits _{a}^{b}f\left(x\right)dx
and select it, and then crtl+m.
Paul
Paul Smith wrote:
Write
\int\limits _{a}^{b}f\left(x\right)dx
and select it, and then crtl+m.
Alternatively set the cursor behind the integral in the formula and use
then the menu Edit - Math - Change Limits Type
regards Uwe
Hi all,
I would like to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below the
integral sign, as in the first example of the attached figure.
How do I do this using LyX?
I can't find any button in the Math Panel the performs this task, is there
any?
I have only suceeded in writing
On 6/17/06, Andreas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to write integrals with limits forced to be above and below the
integral sign, as in the first example of the attached figure.
Write
\int\limits _{a}^{b}f\left(x\right)dx
and select it, and then crtl+m.
Paul
Paul Smith wrote:
Write
\int\limits _{a}^{b}f\left(x\right)dx
and select it, and then crtl+m.
Alternatively set the cursor behind the integral in the formula and use
then the menu Edit -> Math -> Change Limits Type
regards Uwe
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 11:09:33PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
I thought I'd add this to the wiki... but does anyone know what Alt-m l
actually does?
It toggles between '\limits' and '' in inline math and '\nolimits' and
'' in displayed math.
And while talking about that.. is
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 11:09:33PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
I thought I'd add this to the wiki... but does anyone know what Alt-m l
actually does?
It toggles between '\limits' and '' in inline math and '\nolimits' and
'' in displayed math.
And while talking about that.. is
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 11:09:33PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I thought I'd add this to the wiki... but does anyone know what "Alt-m l"
> actually does?
It toggles between '\limits' and '' in inline math and '\nolimits' and
'' in displayed math.
> And while talking about that.. is
Hi .*
I am writing a script of my maths lecture at university with LyX. Pretty much
everything is looking like I want it to, but the Integrals look kind of ugly.
Is there any (easy) way to put the numbers (start and stop of the interval)
directly above and under the Integral sign? Until now, I
Christian Marker wrote:
I am writing a script of my maths lecture at university with LyX. Pretty much
everything is looking like I want it to, but the Integrals look kind of ugly.
Is there any (easy) way to put the numbers (start and stop of the interval)
directly above and under the Integral
El Domingo, 4 de Enero de 2004 11:59, Christian Marker escribió:
Hi .*
I am writing a script of my maths lecture at university with LyX. Pretty
much everything is looking like I want it to, but the Integrals look kind
of ugly. Is there any (easy) way to put the numbers (start and stop
it to, but the Integrals look kind
of ugly. Is there any (easy) way to put the numbers (start and stop of the
interval) directly above and under the Integral sign? Until now, I drop
you have to do the following:
-write \int^a _b
-put the cursor in a way where the integral symbol is selected
Hi Alejandro!
Am Sonntag 04 Januar 2004 13:12 schrieb Alejandro Lorenzo Gallego:
El Domingo, 4 de Enero de 2004 11:59, Christian Marker escribió:
Hi .*
[...]
\int ^a _b
I also tried _b \int ^a, but this is'n looking nice, either...
[...]
Well, i had the same question in the
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Christian Marker wrote:
If you don't know what I mean, I might have a look at:
http://www.keen-web.de/none-of-your-business/tmp/mathe1.png (about 40 KB)
I think that's the way it's supposed to look when the math is 'inline'
rather than in 'display' mode... but I have no
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Alejandro Lorenzo Gallego wrote:
El Domingo, 4 de Enero de 2004 11:59, Christian Marker escribió:
Hi .*
I am writing a script of my maths lecture at university with LyX. Pretty
much everything is looking like I want it to, but the Integrals look kind
of ugly
:
\int\limits_b ^a )
For integrals the limits are always set beside the operator
(nolimits-mode). For sums the limits are set beside the operator in
inline formulas and over/under them (limits-mode) in dislay-style
formulas. So M-m l has nothing to do with inline ore display-style mode.
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Thanks, I added your tip here:
http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/FAQ/Unsorted#changeMathLimits
/Christian
PS.
I read 9.2, it was very nice! I didn't know that there was a menu entry
for this... to be honest, I didn't even know that Edit-Math
Hi .*
I am writing a script of my maths lecture at university with LyX. Pretty much
everything is looking like I want it to, but the Integrals look kind of ugly.
Is there any (easy) way to put the numbers (start and stop of the interval)
directly above and under the Integral sign? Until now, I
Christian Marker wrote:
I am writing a script of my maths lecture at university with LyX. Pretty much
everything is looking like I want it to, but the Integrals look kind of ugly.
Is there any (easy) way to put the numbers (start and stop of the interval)
directly above and under the Integral
El Domingo, 4 de Enero de 2004 11:59, Christian Marker escribió:
Hi .*
I am writing a script of my maths lecture at university with LyX. Pretty
much everything is looking like I want it to, but the Integrals look kind
of ugly. Is there any (easy) way to put the numbers (start and stop
it to, but the Integrals look kind
of ugly. Is there any (easy) way to put the numbers (start and stop of the
interval) directly above and under the Integral sign? Until now, I drop
you have to do the following:
-write \int^a _b
-put the cursor in a way where the integral symbol is selected
Hi Alejandro!
Am Sonntag 04 Januar 2004 13:12 schrieb Alejandro Lorenzo Gallego:
El Domingo, 4 de Enero de 2004 11:59, Christian Marker escribió:
Hi .*
[...]
\int ^a _b
I also tried _b \int ^a, but this is'n looking nice, either...
[...]
Well, i had the same question in the
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Christian Marker wrote:
If you don't know what I mean, I might have a look at:
http://www.keen-web.de/none-of-your-business/tmp/mathe1.png (about 40 KB)
I think that's the way it's supposed to look when the math is 'inline'
rather than in 'display' mode... but I have no
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Alejandro Lorenzo Gallego wrote:
El Domingo, 4 de Enero de 2004 11:59, Christian Marker escribió:
Hi .*
I am writing a script of my maths lecture at university with LyX. Pretty
much everything is looking like I want it to, but the Integrals look kind
of ugly
:
\int\limits_b ^a )
For integrals the limits are always set beside the operator
(nolimits-mode). For sums the limits are set beside the operator in
inline formulas and over/under them (limits-mode) in dislay-style
formulas. So M-m l has nothing to do with inline ore display-style mode.
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Thanks, I added your tip here:
http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/FAQ/Unsorted#changeMathLimits
/Christian
PS.
I read 9.2, it was very nice! I didn't know that there was a menu entry
for this... to be honest, I didn't even know that Edit-Math
Hi .*
I am writing a script of my maths lecture at university with LyX. Pretty much
everything is looking like I want it to, but the Integrals look kind of ugly.
Is there any (easy) way to put the numbers (start and stop of the interval)
directly above and under the Integral sign? Until now, I
Christian Marker wrote:
I am writing a script of my maths lecture at university with LyX. Pretty much
everything is looking like I want it to, but the Integrals look kind of ugly.
Is there any (easy) way to put the numbers (start and stop of the interval)
directly above and under the Integral
El Domingo, 4 de Enero de 2004 11:59, Christian Marker escribió:
> Hi .*
>
> I am writing a script of my maths lecture at university with LyX. Pretty
> much everything is looking like I want it to, but the Integrals look kind
> of ugly. Is there any (easy) way to put the numbers
ing like I want it to, but the Integrals look kind
> > of ugly. Is there any (easy) way to put the numbers (start and stop of the
> > interval) directly above and under the Integral sign? Until now, I drop
>
> you have to do the following:
> -write \int^a _b
> -put the cu
Hi Alejandro!
Am Sonntag 04 Januar 2004 13:12 schrieb Alejandro Lorenzo Gallego:
> El Domingo, 4 de Enero de 2004 11:59, Christian Marker escribió:
> > Hi .*
[...]
> > \int ^a _b
> >
> > I also tried _b \int ^a, but this is'n looking nice, either...
> >
[...]
> Well, i had the same
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Christian Marker wrote:
> If you don't know what I mean, I might have a look at:
> http://www.keen-web.de/none-of-your-business/tmp/mathe1.png (about 40 KB)
I think that's the way it's supposed to look when the math is 'inline'
rather than in 'display' mode... but I have no
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Alejandro Lorenzo Gallego wrote:
> El Domingo, 4 de Enero de 2004 11:59, Christian Marker escribió:
> > Hi .*
> >
> > I am writing a script of my maths lecture at university with LyX. Pretty
> > much everything is looking like I want it to,
In english:
M-m l (Alt-M-l) toggle between the two commands \limits \nolimits.(You
can write the example in the following way:
\int\limits_b ^a )
For integrals the limits are always set beside the operator
(nolimits-mode). For sums the limits are set beside the operator in
inline formulas and ov
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Thanks, I added your tip here:
http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/FAQ/Unsorted#changeMathLimits
/Christian
PS.
I read 9.2, it was very nice! I didn't know that there was a menu entry
for this... to be honest, I didn't even know that Edit->Math
Hi,
since 1.2.1 I experienced a strange behavior of the limits of integral. If I
put the limits above and below the Integral either with \limits or with the
M-m l shortcut it works fine till I save and reopen the document.
After reopening the limit placement changed back to the normal placement
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:27:06AM +0100, Thorsten Fischer wrote:
since 1.2.1
Does this include 1.3.0cvs?
Is this a known bug?
Yes, there have been bugs in that area, but I believed they have been
squashed.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:27:06AM +0100, Thorsten Fischer
Andre wrote:
since 1.2.1
Andre Does this include 1.3.0cvs?
Is this a known bug?
Andre Yes, there have been bugs in that area, but I believed they
Andre have been squashed.
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:49:28AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre Yes, there have been bugs in that area, but I believed they
Andre have been squashed.
Andre, I can confirm this bug in 1.2.2cvs. Do you have a fix in hand?
No...
but now. See attachment.
Andre'
--
Those who
Thorsten Fischer wrote:
Hi,
since 1.2.1 I experienced a strange behavior of the limits of integral. If I
put the limits above and below the Integral either with \limits or with the
M-m l shortcut it works fine till I save and reopen the document.
After reopening the limit placement changed
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:49:28AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre wrote: Yes, there have been bugs in that area, but I believed
Andre they have been squashed.
Andre, I can confirm this bug in 1.2.2cvs. Do you have a fix in
hand?
Andre
Hi,
since 1.2.1 I experienced a strange behavior of the limits of integral. If I
put the limits above and below the Integral either with \limits or with the
M-m l shortcut it works fine till I save and reopen the document.
After reopening the limit placement changed back to the normal placement
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:27:06AM +0100, Thorsten Fischer wrote:
since 1.2.1
Does this include 1.3.0cvs?
Is this a known bug?
Yes, there have been bugs in that area, but I believed they have been
squashed.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:27:06AM +0100, Thorsten Fischer
Andre wrote:
since 1.2.1
Andre Does this include 1.3.0cvs?
Is this a known bug?
Andre Yes, there have been bugs in that area, but I believed they
Andre have been squashed.
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:49:28AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre Yes, there have been bugs in that area, but I believed they
Andre have been squashed.
Andre, I can confirm this bug in 1.2.2cvs. Do you have a fix in hand?
No...
but now. See attachment.
Andre'
--
Those who
Thorsten Fischer wrote:
Hi,
since 1.2.1 I experienced a strange behavior of the limits of integral. If I
put the limits above and below the Integral either with \limits or with the
M-m l shortcut it works fine till I save and reopen the document.
After reopening the limit placement changed
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:49:28AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre wrote: Yes, there have been bugs in that area, but I believed
Andre they have been squashed.
Andre, I can confirm this bug in 1.2.2cvs. Do you have a fix in
hand?
Andre
Hi,
since 1.2.1 I experienced a strange behavior of the limits of integral. If I
put the limits above and below the Integral either with \limits or with the
M-m l shortcut it works fine till I save and reopen the document.
After reopening the limit placement changed back to the "normal"
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:27:06AM +0100, Thorsten Fischer wrote:
> since 1.2.1
Does this include 1.3.0cvs?
> Is this a known bug?
Yes, there have been bugs in that area, but I believed they have been
squashed.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:27:06AM +0100, Thorsten Fischer
Andre> wrote:
>> since 1.2.1
Andre> Does this include 1.3.0cvs?
>> Is this a known bug?
Andre> Yes, there have been bugs in that area, but I believed they
Andre> have
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:49:28AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> Yes, there have been bugs in that area, but I believed they
> Andre> have been squashed.
>
> Andre, I can confirm this bug in 1.2.2cvs. Do you have a fix in hand?
No...
but now. See attachment.
Andre'
--
Those who
Thorsten Fischer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since 1.2.1 I experienced a strange behavior of the limits of integral. If I
> put the limits above and below the Integral either with \limits or with the
> M-m l shortcut it works fine till I save and reopen the document.
> After reopening the limit placement
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:49:28AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: Yes, there have been bugs in that area, but I believed
Andre> they have been squashed.
>> Andre, I can confirm this bug in 1.2.2cvs. Do you have a fix in
for integrals, in both math modes!
In this point I disagree with you. Type the following in the middle part of a
multiline formula and you will get a sum with super/subscripted limits:
\sum \limits _n=1 ^\infty n
Therefore it's not correct, when LyX views these symbols different to
the latex
for integrals, in both math modes!
In this point I disagree with you. Type the following in the middle part of a
multiline formula and you will get a sum with super/subscripted limits:
\sum \limits _n=1 ^\infty n
Therefore it's not correct, when LyX views these symbols different to
the latex
nder the sum.
>The option \limits works only for integrals, in both math modes!
In this point I disagree with you. Type the following in the middle part of a
multiline formula and you will get a sum with super/subscripted limits:
\sum \limits _n=1 ^\infty n
>Therefore it's not correct,
Hi,
while trying to solve the different behavior of sums and integrals in
multiline equations I discovered another problem.
When you copy an integral with super/subscripted limits (mark the integral, C-C,
move to insert position, C-V) the copied integral turns out to have
postscripted limits
Herbert wrote:
Alexander Wollmann wrote:
I have a problem with the subscript of sums and integrals:
In a single math line (M-m d) the subscript is correctly placed UNDER the sum.
Toggle with M-m l changes from "under" to "shifted to the right".
In a multiline equ
The LaTeX-Export looks like this:
\begin{eqnarray*}
\sum ^{n}_{i=1}i \\
\sum\nolimits _{i=1}^{n}i \\
\int\limits ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}} \\
\int ^{\infty }_{x=0}e^{-x^{2}}
\end{eqnarray*}
But correct would be:
Hi,
while trying to solve the different behavior of sums and integrals in
multiline equations I discovered another problem.
When you copy an integral with super/subscripted limits (mark the integral, C-C,
move to insert position, C-V) the copied integral turns out to have
postscripted limits
Herbert wrote:
Alexander Wollmann wrote:
I have a problem with the subscript of sums and integrals:
In a single math line (M-m d) the subscript is correctly placed UNDER the sum.
Toggle with M-m l changes from "under" to "shifted to the right".
In a multiline equ
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
