On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:58:18PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
I'll take a look at your changes aswell but aehm why do you need to
compile with gcc/g++ 4.1?
I believe that this is the default compiler in unstable.
Not yet. At the moment it's still 4.0.3.
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 03:12:43PM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:29:15AM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Hi,
NOTE: I think it's getting quite off-topic here. IMHO wie should move
the package related discussion to this mailinglist:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:58:18PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
I'll take a look at your changes aswell but aehm why do you need to
compile with gcc/g++ 4.1?
I believe that this is the default compiler in unstable.
Not yet. At the moment it's still 4.0.3.
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 03:12:43PM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:29:15AM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Hi,
NOTE: I think it's getting quite off-topic here. IMHO wie should move
the package related discussion to this mailinglist:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:58:18PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
> > I'll take a look at your changes aswell but aehm why do you need to
> > compile with gcc/g++ 4.1?
>
> I believe that this is the default compiler in unstable.
Not yet. At the moment it's still 4.0.3.
> >
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 03:12:43PM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
> Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:29:15AM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Hi,
NOTE: I think it's getting quite off-topic here. IMHO wie should move
the package related discussion to this mailinglist:
Hello,
I'd like to see the Debian package in the archive back in sync with the
upstream version.
I contacted Erinn Clark yesterday (she's listed in the pkg-lyx[1] project on
alioth.debian.org) and she told me that the package is in an orphaned state
but just not marked beeing O. The other former
Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to see the Debian package in the archive back in sync with the
upstream version.
That would be very nice indeed.
I contacted Erinn Clark yesterday (she's listed in the pkg-lyx[1] project
on alioth.debian.org) and she told me that the package is in an
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:24:06AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hello Georg,
Wow that's a fast reply :)
I contacted Erinn Clark yesterday (she's listed in the pkg-lyx[1] project
on alioth.debian.org) and she told me that the package is in an orphaned
state but just not
Sven == Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sven Ah ok. How far is 1.4.2 from beeing released? I would like to
Sven stay with the final releases.
I am not sure yet. We have two or three bad bugs to fix, we are
waiting for a brand new windows installer and we have two larger
patches that may
Sven Hoexter wrote:
Wow that's a fast reply :)
I was waiting for a simulation to finish when your message came in. I am not
always that fast.
Ok so I count that as not relevant for the moment so that the debian
package will stay with the qt and xforms frontend. Or is xforms finaly
Georg Baum wrote :
I'll upload an updated diff for 1.4.2svn to the wiki tonight.
I've got 1.4.1 packages for sid (amd64, i386) and for sarge (i386) for the
qt frontend apt-gettable from http://lyxondebian.free.fr
I can try to upload the source package tonight.
I've started from Georg
Charles de Miramon wrote:
I've started from Georg Baum's version but I made an ugly hack in
debian/rules to force it to compile with gcc 4.1. I don't know how you
should do it properly in Debian. I've updated the dependence fields also
and made some little changes.
I'll have a look at tge
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:29:15AM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Hi,
I've started from Georg Baum's version but I made an ugly hack in
debian/rules to force it to compile with gcc 4.1. I don't know how you
should do it properly in Debian. I've updated the dependence fields also
and made
Sven Hoexter wrote:
I'll take a look at your changes aswell but aehm why do you need to
compile with gcc/g++ 4.1?
I believe that this is the default compiler in unstable.
Regarding g++ 4.1 I found this FTBFS bug in the Debian BTS
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=357119
IIRC
Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:29:15AM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Hi,
I've started from Georg Baum's version but I made an ugly hack in
debian/rules to force it to compile with gcc 4.1. I don't know how you
should do it properly in Debian. I've updated the
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Per Olofsson wrote:
- Is there a DD out in the wild internet willing to sponsor a new Lyx
package?
Yes, I'd be willing to sponsor the package.
What is a DD?
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Per Olofsson wrote:
- Is there a DD out in the wild internet willing to sponsor a new Lyx
package?
Yes, I'd be willing to sponsor the package.
What is a DD?
Debian Developper.
Debian has a full American-oriented lingo, like 'MIA'
Hello,
I'd like to see the Debian package in the archive back in sync with the
upstream version.
I contacted Erinn Clark yesterday (she's listed in the pkg-lyx[1] project on
alioth.debian.org) and she told me that the package is in an orphaned state
but just not marked beeing O. The other former
Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to see the Debian package in the archive back in sync with the
upstream version.
That would be very nice indeed.
I contacted Erinn Clark yesterday (she's listed in the pkg-lyx[1] project
on alioth.debian.org) and she told me that the package is in an
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:24:06AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hello Georg,
Wow that's a fast reply :)
I contacted Erinn Clark yesterday (she's listed in the pkg-lyx[1] project
on alioth.debian.org) and she told me that the package is in an orphaned
state but just not
Sven == Sven Hoexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sven Ah ok. How far is 1.4.2 from beeing released? I would like to
Sven stay with the final releases.
I am not sure yet. We have two or three bad bugs to fix, we are
waiting for a brand new windows installer and we have two larger
patches that may
Sven Hoexter wrote:
Wow that's a fast reply :)
I was waiting for a simulation to finish when your message came in. I am not
always that fast.
Ok so I count that as not relevant for the moment so that the debian
package will stay with the qt and xforms frontend. Or is xforms finaly
Georg Baum wrote :
I'll upload an updated diff for 1.4.2svn to the wiki tonight.
I've got 1.4.1 packages for sid (amd64, i386) and for sarge (i386) for the
qt frontend apt-gettable from http://lyxondebian.free.fr
I can try to upload the source package tonight.
I've started from Georg
Charles de Miramon wrote:
I've started from Georg Baum's version but I made an ugly hack in
debian/rules to force it to compile with gcc 4.1. I don't know how you
should do it properly in Debian. I've updated the dependence fields also
and made some little changes.
I'll have a look at tge
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:29:15AM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Hi,
I've started from Georg Baum's version but I made an ugly hack in
debian/rules to force it to compile with gcc 4.1. I don't know how you
should do it properly in Debian. I've updated the dependence fields also
and made
Sven Hoexter wrote:
I'll take a look at your changes aswell but aehm why do you need to
compile with gcc/g++ 4.1?
I believe that this is the default compiler in unstable.
Regarding g++ 4.1 I found this FTBFS bug in the Debian BTS
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=357119
IIRC
Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:29:15AM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Hi,
I've started from Georg Baum's version but I made an ugly hack in
debian/rules to force it to compile with gcc 4.1. I don't know how you
should do it properly in Debian. I've updated the
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Per Olofsson wrote:
- Is there a DD out in the wild internet willing to sponsor a new Lyx
package?
Yes, I'd be willing to sponsor the package.
What is a DD?
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Per Olofsson wrote:
- Is there a DD out in the wild internet willing to sponsor a new Lyx
package?
Yes, I'd be willing to sponsor the package.
What is a DD?
Debian Developper.
Debian has a full American-oriented lingo, like 'MIA'
Hello,
I'd like to see the Debian package in the archive back in sync with the
upstream version.
I contacted Erinn Clark yesterday (she's listed in the pkg-lyx[1] project on
alioth.debian.org) and she told me that the package is in an orphaned state
but just not marked beeing O. The other former
Sven Hoexter wrote:
> Hello,
> I'd like to see the Debian package in the archive back in sync with the
> upstream version.
That would be very nice indeed.
> I contacted Erinn Clark yesterday (she's listed in the pkg-lyx[1] project
> on alioth.debian.org) and she told me that the package is in
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:24:06AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hello Georg,
Wow that's a fast reply :)
> > I contacted Erinn Clark yesterday (she's listed in the pkg-lyx[1] project
> > on alioth.debian.org) and she told me that the package is in an orphaned
> > state but just
> "Sven" == Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sven> Ah ok. How far is 1.4.2 from beeing released? I would like to
Sven> stay with the final releases.
I am not sure yet. We have two or three bad bugs to fix, we are
waiting for a brand new windows installer and we have two larger
Sven Hoexter wrote:
> Wow that's a fast reply :)
I was waiting for a simulation to finish when your message came in. I am not
always that fast.
> Ok so I count that as not relevant for the moment so that the debian
> package will stay with the qt and xforms frontend. Or is xforms finaly
>
Georg Baum wrote :
>
> I'll upload an updated diff for 1.4.2svn to the wiki tonight.
>
I've got 1.4.1 packages for sid (amd64, i386) and for sarge (i386) for the
qt frontend apt-gettable from http://lyxondebian.free.fr
I can try to upload the source package tonight.
I've started from Georg
Charles de Miramon wrote:
> I've started from Georg Baum's version but I made an ugly hack in
> debian/rules to force it to compile with gcc 4.1. I don't know how you
> should do it properly in Debian. I've updated the dependence fields also
> and made some little changes.
I'll have a look at
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:29:15AM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
Hi,
> I've started from Georg Baum's version but I made an ugly hack in
> debian/rules to force it to compile with gcc 4.1. I don't know how you
> should do it properly in Debian. I've updated the dependence fields also
> and
Sven Hoexter wrote:
> I'll take a look at your changes aswell but aehm why do you need to
> compile with gcc/g++ 4.1?
I believe that this is the default compiler in unstable.
> Regarding g++ 4.1 I found this FTBFS bug in the Debian BTS
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=357119
Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:29:15AM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I've started from Georg Baum's version but I made an ugly hack in
>> debian/rules to force it to compile with gcc 4.1. I don't know how you
>> should do it properly in Debian. I've updated the
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Per Olofsson wrote:
> > - Is there a DD out in the wild internet willing to sponsor a new Lyx
> > package?
>
> Yes, I'd be willing to sponsor the package.
What is a DD?
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 12 May 2006, Per Olofsson wrote:
>
>> > - Is there a DD out in the wild internet willing to sponsor a new Lyx
>> > package?
>>
>> Yes, I'd be willing to sponsor the package.
>
> What is a DD?
>
Debian Developper.
Debian has a full American-oriented lingo,
42 matches
Mail list logo
