- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ; "Angus Leeming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 6:29 PM
Subject: Re: LyX 1.3.7pre5 some more progress in diagnosis
I imagine you've already done t
- Original Message -
From: "Angus Leeming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: LyX 1.3.7pre5 some more progress in diagnosis
Stephen Harris wrote:
Addendum: I find that C:\Msys\1.0\bin or C:\texmf\miktex\bin
or C:\Py
- Original Message -
From: "Angus Leeming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: LyX 1.3.7pre5 some more progress in diagnosis
Stephen Harris wrote:
Addendum: I find that C:\Msys\1.0\bin or C:\texmf\miktex\bin
or C:\Py
Stephen Harris wrote:
> Addendum: I find that C:\Msys\1.0\bin or C:\texmf\miktex\bin
> or C:\Python23 will work individually; but combinations like
> Msys and Python, Msys and texmf, or Python and texmf, will
> fail to run the configure script, requiring sh.exe configure.
> I have installed to C:\L
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 12:07 AM
Subject: Re: LyX 1.3.7pre5 some more progress in diagnosis
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 9:09 PM
Subject: LyX 1.3.7pre5 some progress in diagnosis
As you can see the major differences are in the versions of
ghostscript and Python. Also Miktex has texmf installed under
it
