is:
Document Processor
LyX is an almost WYSIWYG-frontend for LaTeX. It makes the power and
typesetting quality of LaTeX available for people who are used to word
processors. Since LyX supports LaTeX's concept of general mark-ups, it
is even easier and faster to create professional quality documents
in Debian and Ubuntu is:
Document Processor
LyX is an almost WYSIWYG-frontend for LaTeX. It makes the power and
typesetting quality of LaTeX available for people who are used to word
processors. Since LyX supports LaTeX's concept of general mark-ups, it
is even easier and faster to create
On Friday 30 January 2009 03:18:09 am Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-01-29, Steve Litt wrote:
On Thursday 29 January 2009 03:00:45 am Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
My proposal would be:
LyX is a graphical frontend for LaTeX. ...
Well, it is not _just_ that IMHO.
is:
Document Processor
LyX is an almost WYSIWYG-frontend for LaTeX. It makes the power and
typesetting quality of LaTeX available for people who are used to word
processors. Since LyX supports LaTeX's concept of general mark-ups, it
is even easier and faster to create professional quality documents
in Debian and Ubuntu is:
Document Processor
LyX is an almost WYSIWYG-frontend for LaTeX. It makes the power and
typesetting quality of LaTeX available for people who are used to word
processors. Since LyX supports LaTeX's concept of general mark-ups, it
is even easier and faster to create
On Friday 30 January 2009 03:18:09 am Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-01-29, Steve Litt wrote:
On Thursday 29 January 2009 03:00:45 am Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
My proposal would be:
LyX is a graphical frontend for LaTeX. ...
Well, it is not _just_ that IMHO.
luding the heading "Document
Processor"). This would give the discussion a proper base.
The current description of LyX in Debian and Ubuntu is:
Document Processor
LyX is an almost WYSIWYG-frontend for LaTeX. It makes the power and
typesetting quality of LaTeX available for people who are
urrent description of LyX in Debian and Ubuntu is:
>
> Document Processor
>
> LyX is an almost WYSIWYG-frontend for LaTeX. It makes the power and
> typesetting quality of LaTeX available for people who are used to word
> processors. Since LyX supports LaTeX's concept of genera
On Friday 30 January 2009 03:18:09 am Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2009-01-29, Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 January 2009 03:00:45 am Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >> Guenter Milde wrote:
> >> > My proposal would be:
> >> >
> >> >LyX is a graphical frontend for LaTeX. ...
> >>
> >> Well, it
Guenter Milde wrote:
My proposal would be:
LyX is a graphical frontend for LaTeX. ...
Well, it is not _just_ that IMHO. My proposal:
LyX is a graphical word processor mainly used with a LateX backend. LyX
is especially suited for structured document writing.
The plain text export of
On Thursday 29 January 2009 03:00:45 am Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
My proposal would be:
LyX is a graphical frontend for LaTeX. ...
Well, it is not _just_ that IMHO. My proposal:
LyX is a graphical word processor mainly used with a LateX backend. LyX
While this is
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 12:30 -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
On Thursday 29 January 2009 03:00:45 am Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
My proposal would be:
LyX is a graphical frontend for LaTeX. ...
Well, it is not _just_ that IMHO. My proposal:
LyX is a graphical word
On Thursday 29 January 2009, Steve Litt wrote:
Yes it is, although creation and modification of styles is an order of
magnitude or two harder than with MS Word or WordPerfect.
Contemplating the styles created by most MS Word Power Users* I can regard
that shortcoming as a major advantage.
*
Guenter Milde wrote:
My proposal would be:
LyX is a graphical frontend for LaTeX. ...
Well, it is not _just_ that IMHO. My proposal:
LyX is a graphical word processor mainly used with a LateX backend. LyX
is especially suited for structured document writing.
The plain text export of
On Thursday 29 January 2009 03:00:45 am Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
My proposal would be:
LyX is a graphical frontend for LaTeX. ...
Well, it is not _just_ that IMHO. My proposal:
LyX is a graphical word processor mainly used with a LateX backend. LyX
While this is
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 12:30 -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
On Thursday 29 January 2009 03:00:45 am Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
My proposal would be:
LyX is a graphical frontend for LaTeX. ...
Well, it is not _just_ that IMHO. My proposal:
LyX is a graphical word
On Thursday 29 January 2009, Steve Litt wrote:
Yes it is, although creation and modification of styles is an order of
magnitude or two harder than with MS Word or WordPerfect.
Contemplating the styles created by most MS Word Power Users* I can regard
that shortcoming as a major advantage.
*
Guenter Milde wrote:
My proposal would be:
LyX is a graphical frontend for LaTeX. ...
Well, it is not _just_ that IMHO. My proposal:
"LyX is a graphical word processor mainly used with a LateX backend. LyX
is especially suited for structured document writing."
The plain text export of
On Thursday 29 January 2009 03:00:45 am Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
> > My proposal would be:
> >
> >LyX is a graphical frontend for LaTeX. ...
>
> Well, it is not _just_ that IMHO. My proposal:
>
> "LyX is a graphical word processor mainly used with a LateX backend. LyX
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 12:30 -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Thursday 29 January 2009 03:00:45 am Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Guenter Milde wrote:
> > > My proposal would be:
> > >
> > >LyX is a graphical frontend for LaTeX. ...
> >
> > Well, it is not _just_ that IMHO. My proposal:
> >
> > "LyX
On Thursday 29 January 2009, Steve Litt wrote:
> Yes it is, although creation and modification of styles is an order of
> magnitude or two harder than with MS Word or WordPerfect.
Contemplating the styles created by most MS Word "Power Users"* I can regard
that "shortcoming" as a major
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
With this phrase starts the description of LyX in Ubuntu's repositories.
I think it should read: LyX is a WYSIWYM document processor.
Anybody know's who should be contacted about that (if, of course, you
_also_ disagree with the current
On 2009-01-27, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
With this phrase starts the description of LyX in Ubuntu's repositories.
This seems to be taken from the package description in Debian:
Document Processor
LyX is an almost WYSIWYG-frontend for LaTeX. It makes the power and
typesetting quality
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 11:29 +, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-01-27, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
With this phrase starts the description of LyX in Ubuntu's repositories.
This seems to be taken from the package description in Debian:
Document Processor
LyX is an almost WYSIWYG
leave it as LyX is an almost
WYSIWYG-frontend for LaTeX. To me, it's the most accurate description of the
relationship between paper and work environment appearances.
SteveT
Steve Litt
Recession Relief Package
http://www.recession-relief.US
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
With this phrase starts the description of LyX in Ubuntu's repositories.
I think it should read: LyX is a WYSIWYM document processor.
Anybody know's who should be contacted about that (if, of course, you
_also_ disagree with the current
On 2009-01-27, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
With this phrase starts the description of LyX in Ubuntu's repositories.
This seems to be taken from the package description in Debian:
Document Processor
LyX is an almost WYSIWYG-frontend for LaTeX. It makes the power and
typesetting quality
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 11:29 +, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-01-27, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
With this phrase starts the description of LyX in Ubuntu's repositories.
This seems to be taken from the package description in Debian:
Document Processor
LyX is an almost WYSIWYG
leave it as LyX is an almost
WYSIWYG-frontend for LaTeX. To me, it's the most accurate description of the
relationship between paper and work environment appearances.
SteveT
Steve Litt
Recession Relief Package
http://www.recession-relief.US
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
With this phrase starts the description of LyX in Ubuntu's repositories.
I think it should read: LyX is a WYSIWYM document processor.
Anybody know's who should be contacted about that (if, of course, you
_also_ disagree with the current
On 2009-01-27, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
> With this phrase starts the description of LyX in Ubuntu's repositories.
This seems to be taken from the package description in Debian:
Document Processor
LyX is an almost WYSIWYG-frontend for LaTeX. It makes the power and
typesetting qual
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 11:29 +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2009-01-27, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
> > With this phrase starts the description of LyX in Ubuntu's repositories.
>
> This seems to be taken from the package description in Debian:
>
>Document Processor
>
t;
>LyX is a graphical frontend for LaTeX. ...
This sounds OK, but personally I'd just leave it as "LyX is an almost
WYSIWYG-frontend for LaTeX." To me, it's the most accurate description of the
relationship between paper and work environment appearances.
SteveT
Steve Litt
Recession Relief Package
http://www.recession-relief.US
With this phrase starts the description of LyX in Ubuntu's repositories.
I think it should read: LyX is a WYSIWYM document processor.
Anybody know's who should be contacted about that (if, of course, you
_also_ disagree with the current description)?
Kind regards, Nikos
With this phrase starts the description of LyX in Ubuntu's repositories.
I think it should read: LyX is a WYSIWYM document processor.
Anybody know's who should be contacted about that (if, of course, you
_also_ disagree with the current description)?
Kind regards, Nikos
With this phrase starts the description of LyX in Ubuntu's repositories.
I think it should read: LyX is a WYSIWYM document processor.
Anybody know's who should be contacted about that (if, of course, you
_also_ disagree with the current description)?
Kind regards, Nikos
36 matches
Mail list logo
