On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 06:47:33PM -0100, Uwe Brauer wrote:
Well I downloaded and compiled 1.2.3, created a new document, and
tried to export it to docbook, but alas I cannot see *this option*
where is it???
You need to select a adequate document style in layout-document.
SGML article
On Friday 17 January 2003 08:03, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 06:47:33PM -0100, Uwe Brauer wrote:
Well I downloaded and compiled 1.2.3, created a new document, and
tried to export it to docbook, but alas I cannot see *this option*
where is it???
You need to select a
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 08:33:58AM +, José Matos wrote:
After dealing with dealing with the visitor pattern.
Duedelue...
[José: Why?]
The question is: Why don't we allow .xml export for arbitrary styles, e.g.
plain article and need some fancy other style? What's the big difference?
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 06:47:33PM -0100, Uwe Brauer wrote:
Well I downloaded and compiled 1.2.3, created a new document, and
tried to export it to docbook, but alas I cannot see *this option*
where is it???
You need to select a adequate document style in layout-document.
SGML article
On Friday 17 January 2003 08:03, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 06:47:33PM -0100, Uwe Brauer wrote:
Well I downloaded and compiled 1.2.3, created a new document, and
tried to export it to docbook, but alas I cannot see *this option*
where is it???
You need to select a
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 08:33:58AM +, José Matos wrote:
After dealing with dealing with the visitor pattern.
Duedelue...
[José: Why?]
The question is: Why don't we allow .xml export for arbitrary styles, e.g.
plain article and need some fancy other style? What's the big difference?
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 06:47:33PM -0100, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> Well I downloaded and compiled 1.2.3, created a new document, and
> tried to export it to docbook, but alas I cannot see *this option*
> where is it???
You need to select a adequate document style in layout->document.
SGML article
On Friday 17 January 2003 08:03, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 06:47:33PM -0100, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> > Well I downloaded and compiled 1.2.3, created a new document, and
> > tried to export it to docbook, but alas I cannot see *this option*
> > where is it???
>
> You need to select
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 08:33:58AM +, José Matos wrote:
> After dealing with dealing with the visitor pattern.
Duedelue...
> > [José: Why?]
The question is: Why don't we allow .xml export for arbitrary styles, e.g.
plain "article" and need some fancy other style? What's the big
Hello
I am still using LyX 1.1.6fix.
For some time I am looking for converts
LaTeX2XXX with math, where XXX should be some format which a word
processor such as OO (preferred) can read.
Curiously enough, the other direction XXX2latex, seems easier, there
is Word2tex, writer2latex.
There is
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:04:45PM -0100, Uwe Brauer wrote:
I am still using LyX 1.1.6fix.
Poor little tiger.
XXX could be either rtf or some xml format, I don't know whether
docbook, includes math, but may be it will be supported by OO.
We write something similar to MathML when exporting to
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003, Uwe Brauer wrote:
For some time I am looking for converts
LaTeX2XXX with math, where XXX should be some format which a word
processor such as OO (preferred) can read.
Curiously enough, the other direction XXX2latex, seems easier, there
is Word2tex, writer2latex.
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:04:45PM -0100, Uwe Brauer wrote:
I am still using LyX 1.1.6fix.
Poor little tiger.
I am deeply moved.
XXX could be either rtf or some xml format, I don't know whether
docbook, includes math, but may be it will be supported
David A. Case [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is also tex2word, the companion to word2tex. See:
http://www.word2tex.com
Yep I know about it, does not work so well for me so I gave up
This has worked pretty well for me, but a little fine tuning of the
output word document is
Hello
I am still using LyX 1.1.6fix.
For some time I am looking for converts
LaTeX2XXX with math, where XXX should be some format which a word
processor such as OO (preferred) can read.
Curiously enough, the other direction XXX2latex, seems easier, there
is Word2tex, writer2latex.
There is
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:04:45PM -0100, Uwe Brauer wrote:
I am still using LyX 1.1.6fix.
Poor little tiger.
XXX could be either rtf or some xml format, I don't know whether
docbook, includes math, but may be it will be supported by OO.
We write something similar to MathML when exporting to
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003, Uwe Brauer wrote:
For some time I am looking for converts
LaTeX2XXX with math, where XXX should be some format which a word
processor such as OO (preferred) can read.
Curiously enough, the other direction XXX2latex, seems easier, there
is Word2tex, writer2latex.
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:04:45PM -0100, Uwe Brauer wrote:
I am still using LyX 1.1.6fix.
Poor little tiger.
I am deeply moved.
XXX could be either rtf or some xml format, I don't know whether
docbook, includes math, but may be it will be supported
David A. Case [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is also tex2word, the companion to word2tex. See:
http://www.word2tex.com
Yep I know about it, does not work so well for me so I gave up
This has worked pretty well for me, but a little fine tuning of the
output word document is
Hello
I am still using LyX 1.1.6fix.
For some time I am looking for converts
LaTeX2XXX with math, where XXX should be some format which a word
processor such as OO (preferred) can read.
Curiously enough, the other direction XXX2latex, seems easier, there
is Word2tex, writer2latex.
There is
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:04:45PM -0100, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> I am still using LyX 1.1.6fix.
Poor little tiger.
> XXX could be either rtf or some xml format, I don't know whether
> docbook, includes math, but may be it will be supported by OO.
We write something similar to MathML when exporting
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>
> For some time I am looking for converts
> LaTeX2XXX with math, where XXX should be some format which a word
> processor such as OO (preferred) can read.
>
> Curiously enough, the other direction XXX2latex, seems easier, there
> is Word2tex,
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:04:45PM -0100, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>> I am still using LyX 1.1.6fix.
>
> Poor little tiger.
I am deeply moved.
>
>> XXX could be either rtf or some xml format, I don't know whether
>> docbook, includes math, but may be it will
"David A. Case" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> There is also tex2word, the companion to word2tex. See:
>
>http://www.word2tex.com
>
Yep I know about it, does not work so well for me so I gave up
> This has worked pretty well for me, but a little "fine tuning" of the
> output word
24 matches
Mail list logo
