Re: Lyx 1.4.2 for Mac OS X?

2006-07-18 Thread Andrea Censi
On 7/17/06, Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 17, 2006, at 3:06 AM, Andrea Censi wrote: Hello, is there a Mac binary version available somewhere? Not yet. I was away when 1.4.2 came out, and when I got back I had a hard disk failure requiring complete re-installation of a whole

Re: Lyx 1.4.2 for Mac OS X?

2006-07-18 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jul 18, 2006, at 6:18 AM, Andrea Censi wrote: On 7/17/06, Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 17, 2006, at 3:06 AM, Andrea Censi wrote: Hello, is there a Mac binary version available somewhere? Not yet. I was away when 1.4.2 came out, and when I got back I had a hard disk

Re: Lyx 1.4.2 for Mac OS X?

2006-07-18 Thread Andrea Censi
On 7/18/06, Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For LyX-1.4.x, you must use Qt-3.x (latest is 3.3.6) and gcc-3.3. I've never tried building Qt except as static, though I don't see why that wouldn't work. If I used a shared version, the linker complained (sorry, didn't keep the error). I

Re: Lyx 1.4.2 for Mac OS X?

2006-07-18 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jul 18, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Andrea Censi wrote: On 7/18/06, Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For LyX-1.4.x, you must use Qt-3.x (latest is 3.3.6) and gcc-3.3. I've never tried building Qt except as static, though I don't see why that wouldn't work. If I used a shared version, the

Re: Lyx 1.4.2 for Mac OS X?

2006-07-18 Thread Andrea Censi
On 7/17/06, Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 17, 2006, at 3:06 AM, Andrea Censi wrote: Hello, is there a Mac binary version available somewhere? Not yet. I was away when 1.4.2 came out, and when I got back I had a hard disk failure requiring complete re-installation of a whole

Re: Lyx 1.4.2 for Mac OS X?

2006-07-18 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jul 18, 2006, at 6:18 AM, Andrea Censi wrote: On 7/17/06, Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 17, 2006, at 3:06 AM, Andrea Censi wrote: Hello, is there a Mac binary version available somewhere? Not yet. I was away when 1.4.2 came out, and when I got back I had a hard disk

Re: Lyx 1.4.2 for Mac OS X?

2006-07-18 Thread Andrea Censi
On 7/18/06, Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For LyX-1.4.x, you must use Qt-3.x (latest is 3.3.6) and gcc-3.3. I've never tried building Qt except as static, though I don't see why that wouldn't work. If I used a shared version, the linker complained (sorry, didn't keep the error). I

Re: Lyx 1.4.2 for Mac OS X?

2006-07-18 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jul 18, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Andrea Censi wrote: On 7/18/06, Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For LyX-1.4.x, you must use Qt-3.x (latest is 3.3.6) and gcc-3.3. I've never tried building Qt except as static, though I don't see why that wouldn't work. If I used a shared version, the

Re: Lyx 1.4.2 for Mac OS X?

2006-07-18 Thread Andrea Censi
On 7/17/06, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jul 17, 2006, at 3:06 AM, Andrea Censi wrote: > Hello, > is there a Mac binary version available somewhere? Not yet. I was away when 1.4.2 came out, and when I got back I had a hard disk failure requiring complete re-installation of a

Re: Lyx 1.4.2 for Mac OS X?

2006-07-18 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jul 18, 2006, at 6:18 AM, Andrea Censi wrote: On 7/17/06, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jul 17, 2006, at 3:06 AM, Andrea Censi wrote: > Hello, > is there a Mac binary version available somewhere? Not yet. I was away when 1.4.2 came out, and when I got back I had a hard disk

Re: Lyx 1.4.2 for Mac OS X?

2006-07-18 Thread Andrea Censi
On 7/18/06, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For LyX-1.4.x, you must use Qt-3.x (latest is 3.3.6) and gcc-3.3. I've never tried building Qt except as static, though I don't see why that wouldn't work. If I used a shared version, the linker complained (sorry, didn't keep the error). I

Re: Lyx 1.4.2 for Mac OS X?

2006-07-18 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jul 18, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Andrea Censi wrote: On 7/18/06, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For LyX-1.4.x, you must use Qt-3.x (latest is 3.3.6) and gcc-3.3. I've never tried building Qt except as static, though I don't see why that wouldn't work. If I used a shared version, the

Lyx 1.4.2 for Mac OS X?

2006-07-17 Thread Andrea Censi
Hello, is there a Mac binary version available somewhere? Regards, -- Andrea Censi Web: http://www.dis.uniroma1.it/~censi PGP key #569106B2 available on keyservers.

Re: Lyx 1.4.2 for Mac OS X?

2006-07-17 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jul 17, 2006, at 3:06 AM, Andrea Censi wrote: Hello, is there a Mac binary version available somewhere? Not yet. I was away when 1.4.2 came out, and when I got back I had a hard disk failure requiring complete re-installation of a whole bunch of development software, which I am

Lyx 1.4.2 for Mac OS X?

2006-07-17 Thread Andrea Censi
Hello, is there a Mac binary version available somewhere? Regards, -- Andrea Censi Web: http://www.dis.uniroma1.it/~censi PGP key #569106B2 available on keyservers.

Re: Lyx 1.4.2 for Mac OS X?

2006-07-17 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jul 17, 2006, at 3:06 AM, Andrea Censi wrote: Hello, is there a Mac binary version available somewhere? Not yet. I was away when 1.4.2 came out, and when I got back I had a hard disk failure requiring complete re-installation of a whole bunch of development software, which I am

Lyx 1.4.2 for Mac OS X?

2006-07-17 Thread Andrea Censi
Hello, is there a Mac binary version available somewhere? Regards, -- Andrea Censi Web: http://www.dis.uniroma1.it/~censi PGP key #569106B2 available on keyservers.

Re: Lyx 1.4.2 for Mac OS X?

2006-07-17 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jul 17, 2006, at 3:06 AM, Andrea Censi wrote: Hello, is there a Mac binary version available somewhere? Not yet. I was away when 1.4.2 came out, and when I got back I had a hard disk failure requiring complete re-installation of a whole bunch of development software, which I am