On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Jacobo Myesrton wrote:
I think that LyX could look very good ported to MacOSX. The port should
not be very difficult. It is a matter of rewriting the GUI in Cocoa.
...not be very difficult ;-)
Complexity of porting medium-to-low, learning curve of Cocoa unknown.
Is
I think that LyX could look very good ported to MacOSX. The port should
not be very difficult. It is a matter of rewriting the GUI in Cocoa. Is
somebody working on this?
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Jacobo Myesrton wrote:
I think that LyX could look very good ported to MacOSX. The port should
not be very difficult. It is a matter of rewriting the GUI in Cocoa.
...not be very difficult ;-)
Complexity of porting medium-to-low, learning curve of Cocoa unknown.
Is
I think that LyX could look very good ported to MacOSX. The port should
not be very difficult. It is a matter of rewriting the GUI in Cocoa. Is
somebody working on this?
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Jacobo Myesrton wrote:
> I think that LyX could look very good ported to MacOSX. The port should
> not be very difficult. It is a matter of rewriting the GUI in Cocoa.
"...not be very difficult" ;-)
Complexity of porting medium-to-low, learning curve of Cocoa unknown.
>
I think that LyX could look very good ported to MacOSX. The port should
not be very difficult. It is a matter of rewriting the GUI in Cocoa. Is
somebody working on this?