Re: Lyx for OSX (was [OT] TeXmacs?)

2001-04-25 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Jacobo Myesrton wrote: I think that LyX could look very good ported to MacOSX. The port should not be very difficult. It is a matter of rewriting the GUI in Cocoa. ...not be very difficult ;-) Complexity of porting medium-to-low, learning curve of Cocoa unknown. Is

Lyx for OSX (was [OT] TeXmacs?)

2001-04-25 Thread Jacobo Myesrton
I think that LyX could look very good ported to MacOSX. The port should not be very difficult. It is a matter of rewriting the GUI in Cocoa. Is somebody working on this?

Re: Lyx for OSX (was [OT] TeXmacs?)

2001-04-25 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Jacobo Myesrton wrote: I think that LyX could look very good ported to MacOSX. The port should not be very difficult. It is a matter of rewriting the GUI in Cocoa. ...not be very difficult ;-) Complexity of porting medium-to-low, learning curve of Cocoa unknown. Is

Lyx for OSX (was [OT] TeXmacs?)

2001-04-25 Thread Jacobo Myesrton
I think that LyX could look very good ported to MacOSX. The port should not be very difficult. It is a matter of rewriting the GUI in Cocoa. Is somebody working on this?

Re: Lyx for OSX (was [OT] TeXmacs?)

2001-04-25 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Jacobo Myesrton wrote: > I think that LyX could look very good ported to MacOSX. The port should > not be very difficult. It is a matter of rewriting the GUI in Cocoa. "...not be very difficult" ;-) Complexity of porting medium-to-low, learning curve of Cocoa unknown. >

Lyx for OSX (was [OT] TeXmacs?)

2001-04-25 Thread Jacobo Myesrton
I think that LyX could look very good ported to MacOSX. The port should not be very difficult. It is a matter of rewriting the GUI in Cocoa. Is somebody working on this?