On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Unless there are consequences that TeX judges worse than an orphan, if this
specific line is moved to the next page. This is always a pro- and con-game.
I see. Always assumed it was an all-or-nothing issue. And, I never really
paid any
Rich Shepard wrote:
I see. Always assumed it was an all-or-nothing issue. And, I never really
paid any attention to whether or not I've seen orphans and widows before.
This just stuck out.
It's very often a matter of taste, and compromise.
Easy example: Consider preventing an orphan (i.e.
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Unless there are consequences that TeX judges worse than an orphan, if this
specific line is moved to the next page. This is always a pro- and con-game.
I see. Always assumed it was an all-or-nothing issue. And, I never really
paid any
Rich Shepard wrote:
I see. Always assumed it was an all-or-nothing issue. And, I never really
paid any attention to whether or not I've seen orphans and widows before.
This just stuck out.
It's very often a matter of taste, and compromise.
Easy example: Consider preventing an orphan (i.e.
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Unless there are consequences that TeX judges "worse" than an orphan, if this
specific line is moved to the next page. This is always a pro- and con-game.
I see. Always assumed it was an all-or-nothing issue. And, I never really
paid any
Rich Shepard wrote:
> I see. Always assumed it was an all-or-nothing issue. And, I never really
> paid any attention to whether or not I've seen orphans and widows before.
> This just stuck out.
It's very often a matter of taste, and compromise.
Easy example: Consider preventing an orphan (i.e.
How interesting. I copied my Beamer class presentation to KOMA-script
article class to provide a take-away hard copy. Then I changed the page size
to 6x9 so there's plenty of room for notes. At the bottom of page 2 is a
single line. I thought that TeX took care of that.
What have I missed?
Rich Shepard wrote:
I thought that TeX took care of that.
Unless there are consequences that TeX judges worse than an orphan, if this
specific line is moved to the next page. This is always a pro- and con-game.
What have I missed?
You could increase \clubpenalty (which is set to 500
How interesting. I copied my Beamer class presentation to KOMA-script
article class to provide a take-away hard copy. Then I changed the page size
to 6x9 so there's plenty of room for notes. At the bottom of page 2 is a
single line. I thought that TeX took care of that.
What have I missed?
Rich Shepard wrote:
I thought that TeX took care of that.
Unless there are consequences that TeX judges worse than an orphan, if this
specific line is moved to the next page. This is always a pro- and con-game.
What have I missed?
You could increase \clubpenalty (which is set to 500
How interesting. I copied my Beamer class presentation to KOMA-script
article class to provide a take-away hard copy. Then I changed the page size
to 6"x9" so there's plenty of room for notes. At the bottom of page 2 is a
single line. I thought that TeX took care of that.
What have I missed?
Rich Shepard wrote:
> I thought that TeX took care of that.
Unless there are consequences that TeX judges "worse" than an orphan, if this
specific line is moved to the next page. This is always a pro- and con-game.
> What have I missed?
You could increase \clubpenalty (which is set to 500
12 matches
Mail list logo
