On Friday 29 August 2003 05:10, Jim Osborn wrote:
Have I simply lost these documents? There's not much tabular
material in them, and if I knew what to go after, maybe I could edit
the offending stuff out of the .lyx files. Could anyone give advice
on a way to salvage them? Would a very old
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:10:25PM -0700, Jim Osborn wrote:
I've just reinstalled LyX 1.1.5, after using Lyx 1.1.6 on a few
documents, and now when I try to open those documents, I get a
box saying Tabular format 5 is not supported anymore/
Get an older version of LyX ( 1.1.x) for conversion!
From: Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:11:49 +0200
To: Jim Osborn [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX...
X-Spam-Score: -26.1 (--)
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:10:25PM -0700, Jim Osborn wrote
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:18:27AM +0200, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
From: Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:11:49 +0200
To: Jim Osborn [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX...
X-Spam-Score: -26.1
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:11:49AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Is there a reason you do not use 1.3.2?
Hi Andre',
Sorry, I should have referenced my other note in this one;
I'm using a SuSE 7.3 installation, by now apparently too old.
Its gcc is gcc-2.95.3-124, with qt-2.3.1-60.
When I tried to
Am Freitag, 29. August 2003 20:43 schrieb Jim Osborn:
Sorry, I should have referenced my other note in this one;
I'm using a SuSE 7.3 installation, by now apparently too old.
Its gcc is gcc-2.95.3-124, with qt-2.3.1-60.
Hi Jim,
if the only problem is missing RPMs for your system you should
On Friday 29 August 2003 05:10, Jim Osborn wrote:
Have I simply lost these documents? There's not much tabular
material in them, and if I knew what to go after, maybe I could edit
the offending stuff out of the .lyx files. Could anyone give advice
on a way to salvage them? Would a very old
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:10:25PM -0700, Jim Osborn wrote:
I've just reinstalled LyX 1.1.5, after using Lyx 1.1.6 on a few
documents, and now when I try to open those documents, I get a
box saying Tabular format 5 is not supported anymore/
Get an older version of LyX ( 1.1.x) for conversion!
From: Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:11:49 +0200
To: Jim Osborn [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX...
X-Spam-Score: -26.1 (--)
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:10:25PM -0700, Jim Osborn wrote
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:18:27AM +0200, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
From: Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:11:49 +0200
To: Jim Osborn [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX...
X-Spam-Score: -26.1
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:11:49AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Is there a reason you do not use 1.3.2?
Hi Andre',
Sorry, I should have referenced my other note in this one;
I'm using a SuSE 7.3 installation, by now apparently too old.
Its gcc is gcc-2.95.3-124, with qt-2.3.1-60.
When I tried to
Am Freitag, 29. August 2003 20:43 schrieb Jim Osborn:
Sorry, I should have referenced my other note in this one;
I'm using a SuSE 7.3 installation, by now apparently too old.
Its gcc is gcc-2.95.3-124, with qt-2.3.1-60.
Hi Jim,
if the only problem is missing RPMs for your system you should
On Friday 29 August 2003 05:10, Jim Osborn wrote:
>
> Have I simply lost these documents? There's not much "tabular"
> material in them, and if I knew what to go after, maybe I could edit
> the offending stuff out of the .lyx files. Could anyone give advice
> on a way to salvage them? Would a
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:10:25PM -0700, Jim Osborn wrote:
> I've just reinstalled LyX 1.1.5, after using Lyx 1.1.6 on a few
> documents, and now when I try to open those documents, I get a
> box saying "Tabular format < 5 is not supported anymore/
> Get an older version of LyX (< 1.1.x) for
>>From: Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:11:49 +0200
>>To: Jim Osborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: "Warning: ...Get an older version of LyX..."
>>X-Spam-Score: -26.1 (-
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:18:27AM +0200, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
>
> >>From: Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:11:49 +0200
> >>To: Jim Osborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Subject: Re: "Warn
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:11:49AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Is there a reason you do not use 1.3.2?
Hi Andre',
Sorry, I should have referenced my other note in this one;
I'm using a SuSE 7.3 installation, by now apparently too old.
Its gcc is gcc-2.95.3-124, with qt-2.3.1-60.
When I tried
Am Freitag, 29. August 2003 20:43 schrieb Jim Osborn:
> Sorry, I should have referenced my other note in this one;
> I'm using a SuSE 7.3 installation, by now apparently too old.
> Its gcc is gcc-2.95.3-124, with qt-2.3.1-60.
Hi Jim,
if the only problem is missing RPMs for your system you should
18 matches
Mail list logo
