Re: Track changes but don't show them in LyX?

2012-09-18 Thread Rainer M Krug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/09/12 00:36, Anders Host-Madsen wrote: This is also a feature I sorely miss. Unless you only have a few changes, the LyX display quickly becomes unreadable. The consequence is that the the resulting pdf can have errors that are overlooked

Re: Track changes but don't show them in LyX?

2012-09-18 Thread Rainer M Krug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/09/12 00:36, Anders Host-Madsen wrote: This is also a feature I sorely miss. Unless you only have a few changes, the LyX display quickly becomes unreadable. The consequence is that the the resulting pdf can have errors that are overlooked

Re: Track changes but don't show them in LyX?

2012-09-18 Thread Rainer M Krug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/09/12 00:36, Anders Host-Madsen wrote: > This is also a feature I sorely miss. Unless you only have a few changes, the > LyX display > quickly becomes unreadable. The consequence is that the the resulting pdf can > have errors that > are

Re: Track changes but don't show them in LyX?

2012-09-17 Thread Anders Host-Madsen
This is also a feature I sorely miss. Unless you only have a few changes, the LyX display quickly becomes unreadable. The consequence is that the the resulting pdf can have errors that are overlooked in LyX, a typical example being missing spaces.

Re: Track changes but don't show them in LyX?

2012-09-17 Thread Anders Host-Madsen
This is also a feature I sorely miss. Unless you only have a few changes, the LyX display quickly becomes unreadable. The consequence is that the the resulting pdf can have errors that are overlooked in LyX, a typical example being missing spaces.

Re: Track changes but don't show them in LyX?

2012-09-17 Thread Anders Host-Madsen
This is also a feature I sorely miss. Unless you only have a few changes, the LyX display quickly becomes unreadable. The consequence is that the the resulting pdf can have errors that are overlooked in LyX, a typical example being missing spaces.

Re: Track changes but don't show them in LyX?

2012-09-13 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote: as far as I can see, there is no way of silently tracking changes, i.e. whenever track changes are enabled, they are shown in LyX - is this correct? If yes, should I file a enhancement, i.e. would others be interested

Re: Track changes but don't show them in LyX?

2012-09-13 Thread Rainer M Krug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 13/09/12 18:00, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote: as far as I can see, there is no way of silently tracking changes, i.e. whenever track changes are enabled, they are shown in LyX

Re: Track changes but don't show them in LyX?

2012-09-13 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote: as far as I can see, there is no way of silently tracking changes, i.e. whenever track changes are enabled, they are shown in LyX - is this correct? If yes, should I file a enhancement, i.e. would others be interested

Re: Track changes but don't show them in LyX?

2012-09-13 Thread Rainer M Krug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 13/09/12 18:00, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote: as far as I can see, there is no way of silently tracking changes, i.e. whenever track changes are enabled, they are shown in LyX

Re: Track changes but don't show them in LyX?

2012-09-13 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote: > as far as I can see, there is no way of "silently" tracking changes, i.e. > whenever track changes > are enabled, they are shown in LyX - is this correct? > > If yes, should I file a enhancement, i.e. would others be

Re: Track changes but don't show them in LyX?

2012-09-13 Thread Rainer M Krug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 13/09/12 18:00, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote: > >> as far as I can see, there is no way of "silently" tracking changes, i.e. >> whenever track >> changes are enabled, they are