Re: find next?

Am 21.02.2021 um 07:12 schrieb Daniel : > > On 2021-02-21 02:12, David Pesetsky wrote: >> Perhaps there is a font size problem? This is what I see. Notice that not >> only are the "<" and ">" indicators missing, but "Case sensitive" overlaps >> the next checkbox. (Hoping this listserv

Re: find next?

On 2021-02-21 02:12, David Pesetsky wrote: Perhaps there is a font size problem?  This is what I see.  Notice that not only are the "<" and ">" indicators missing, but "Case sensitive" overlaps the next checkbox.  (Hoping this listserv doesn't strip out graphics attachments.) I see the

Re: find next?

I'm not seeing "<" or ">" on the buttons. -David On Feb 20, 2021, at 3:07 PM, Kornel Benko mailto:kor...@lyx.org>> wrote: Am Sat, 20 Feb 2021 19:53:20 + schrieb David Pesetsky mailto:pese...@mit.edu>>: Trying it out on 2.4.0 Alpha 3, it seems to work very well now, thank you again. But

Re: find next?

Am Sat, 20 Feb 2021 19:53:20 + schrieb David Pesetsky : > Trying it out on 2.4.0 Alpha 3, it seems to work very well now, thank you > again. But I > am seeing two "Find" and two "Replace" buttons. Not a functionality problem > — they > both work — but presumably some kind of error. You

Re: find next?

Trying it out on 2.4.0 Alpha 3, it seems to work very well now, thank you again. But I am seeing two "Find" and two "Replace" buttons. Not a functionality problem — they both work — but presumably some kind of error. -David On Feb 12, 2021, at 10:24 AM, David Pesetsky

Re: find next?

As I posted, I get the same, and I most certainly did all the steps, it did find the string in thw window and with the "Find-Next" but not with CMD-G frontends/qt4/GuiApplication.cpp (1603): cmd: action: 241 [word-find] arg: 'ermany 0 0 1' x: 0 y: 0 BufferView.cpp

Re: find next?

Statusbar shows nothing. /Applications/LyX.app/Contents/MacOS/lyx -dbg action shows frontends/qt4/GuiApplication.cpp (1603): cmd: action: 169 [word-find-forward] arg: '' x: 0 y: 0 BufferView.cpp (1261): BufferView::dispatch: cmd: action: 169 [word-find-forward] arg:

Re: find next?

Yes hundreds of times for man years. On the Mac Ctrl-F does not work, it is CMD-F el On 2021-02-13 18:07 , Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Samstag, dem 13.02.2021 um 18:03 +0200 schrieb Dr Eberhard W Lisse: >> Makes no difference here. > > Just to be sure, did you really try this? > > 1.

Re: find next?

Am Samstag, dem 13.02.2021 um 18:08 +0100 schrieb Daniel: > frontends/qt4/GuiApplication.cpp (1603): cmd:  action: 169 > [word-find-forward]  arg: '' x: 0 y: 0 This indicates that there is no search string in the cache. Did you really do step 3 in my recipe? Jürgen signature.asc Description:

Re: find next?

On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 8:20 AM Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 2/12/21 7:43 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 8:24 AM David Pesetsky wrote: > >> Pleased indeed, thank you!!! >> >> On Feb 12, 2021, at 10:14 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> >> Am Freitag, dem 12.02.2021

Re: find next?

On 2021-02-13 17:50, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Samstag, dem 13.02.2021 um 17:43 +0100 schrieb Daniel: Seems not to work here either. What does the statusbar show if you hit ⌘-G? Also, can you check for "action" dbg messages? Jürgen No status bar message. When I select "action" in the

Re: find next?

Am Samstag, dem 13.02.2021 um 17:43 +0100 schrieb Daniel: > Seems not to work here either. What does the statusbar show if you hit ⌘-G? Also, can you check for "action" dbg messages? Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- lyx-users mailing list

Re: find next?

On 2021-02-13 17:07, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Samstag, dem 13.02.2021 um 18:03 +0200 schrieb Dr Eberhard W Lisse: Makes no difference here. Just to be sure, did you really try this? 1. Ctrl-F 2. Enter search string 3. Hit Enter to find first occurrence 4. Click into workarea OR close

Re: find next?

Am Samstag, dem 13.02.2021 um 18:03 +0200 schrieb Dr Eberhard W Lisse: > Makes no difference here. Just to be sure, did you really try this? 1. Ctrl-F 2. Enter search string 3. Hit Enter to find first occurrence 4. Click into workarea OR close dialog 5. Hit ⌘-G to find next occurrences Jürgen

Re: find next?

Makes no difference here. Mac 11.2.1 and LyX 2.3.6.2 with mac.bind having \bind "C-g" "word-find-forward" The Preferences -> shortcut shows same bound to ⌘-G and my user.bind shows nothing. F3 and Shift-F3 (on my MacBook with Strip) shows 'Unknown Function' but no name of that unknow

Re: find next?

On 2/12/21 7:43 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 8:24 AM David Pesetsky > wrote: > > Pleased indeed, thank you!!! > >> On Feb 12, 2021, at 10:14 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller > > wrote: >> >> Am Freitag, dem 12.02.2021 um

Re: find next?

On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 8:24 AM David Pesetsky wrote: > Pleased indeed, thank you!!! > > On Feb 12, 2021, at 10:14 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Freitag, dem 12.02.2021 um 14:53 + schrieb David Pesetsky: > > If you click on the document window, the "find next" key (⌘-G ) will > do

Re: find next?

Pleased indeed, thank you!!! On Feb 12, 2021, at 10:14 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller mailto:sp...@lyx.org>> wrote: Am Freitag, dem 12.02.2021 um 14:53 + schrieb David Pesetsky: If you click on the document window, the "find next" key (⌘-G ) will do its job and get you to the next occurrence of the

Re: find next?

Am Freitag, dem 12.02.2021 um 14:53 + schrieb David Pesetsky: > If you click on the document window, the "find next" key (⌘-G ) will > do its job and get you to the next occurrence of the search string. >  Without that, however, if focus remains in the Find window, nothing > happens at all.

Re: find next?

I really appreciate all the replies. Jürgen's message is exactly what I discovered with more tinkering. If you click on the document window, the "find next" key (⌘-G ) will do its job and get you to the next occurrence of the search string. Without that, however, if focus remains in the Find

Re: find next?

> On Feb 11, 2021, at 5:28 PM, David Pesetsky wrote: > > My Macintosh-educated fingers are used to ⌘-G for "find next" (used after > using ⌘-F for "find"). Does Lyx have a "find next" function so I can > duplicate this? > > I may be missing something in plain view, in which case, my

Re: find next?

Am Freitag, dem 12.02.2021 um 08:35 +0200 schrieb Dr Eberhard W Lisse: > I can also confirm that CMD-G is bound to word-find-forward in > 2.3.6.2  and (that non working of if) has been irritating me on > all of my Macs for at least 5 but maybe even 10 years. > > Does one of the (Core-) Developers

Re: find next?

I can also confirm that CMD-G is bound to word-find-forward in 2.3.6.2 and (that non working of if) has been irritating me on all of my Macs for at least 5 but maybe even 10 years. Does one of the (Core-) Developers have a Mac? el On 2021-02-12 04:39 , Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On

Re: find next?

On 2/11/21 9:38 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 2/11/21 8:21 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: >> On 2/11/21 7:28 PM, David Pesetsky wrote: >>> My Macintosh-educated fingers are used to ⌘-G for "find next" (used >>> after using ⌘-F for "find").  Does Lyx have a "find next" function so >>> I can

Re: find next?

On 2/11/21 8:21 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > On 2/11/21 7:28 PM, David Pesetsky wrote: >> My Macintosh-educated fingers are used to ⌘-G for "find next" (used >> after using ⌘-F for "find").  Does Lyx have a "find next" function so >> I can duplicate this? >> >> I may be missing something in plain

Re: find next?

On 2/11/21 7:28 PM, David Pesetsky wrote: My Macintosh-educated fingers are used to ⌘-G for "find next" (used after using ⌘-F for "find"). Does Lyx have a "find next" function so I can duplicate this? I may be missing something in plain view, in which case, my apologies for wasting