On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:48:36 +, Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'make' controls the process of building the package by delegating the
compilation of individual files to a C++ compiler. Once all files have
been compiled, it passes them all to a linker to generate the executable.
Paul Smith wrote:
Thanks, Angus, for your explanation. The log file is attached as
requested.
Extracting this from your log file:
Configuration
C++ Compiler: g++ (3.4.1)
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I.
-I../../../../../boost/libs/filesystem/src
-I../../../../src -Winvalid-pch
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:58:57 +, Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, why not just try to use the modified version of the script,
attached, which tries to do this automatically. If you find that it works,
then I'll upload it to the wiki page.
Success, Angus!
Paul
, Angus!
Excellent! So why aven't you uploaded tex2lyx_MD10.1_17Feb05.tar.gz to the
wiki yet? ;-)
Edit the wiki page, adding
*[[Attach:packages/tex2lyx_MD10.1_17Feb05.tar.gz tex2lyx for Mandrake 10.1
(17 Feb 2005, XXXkB)]].
Save (don't forget your name in the Author field) and then select
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:46:00 +, Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent! So why aven't you uploaded tex2lyx_MD10.1_17Feb05.tar.gz to the
wiki yet? ;-)
It is already uploaded.
The result of my first try with tex2lyx:
$ tex2lyx UserGuide.tex UserGuide1.lyx
Ignoring options 'T1
Paul Smith wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:46:00 +, Angus Leeming
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent! So why aven't you uploaded tex2lyx_MD10.1_17Feb05.tar.gz to
the wiki yet? ;-)
It is already uploaded.
The result of my first try with tex2lyx:
$ tex2lyx UserGuide.tex UserGuide1
code. I
have some other examples where tex2lyx does not do a perfect job.
Paul
Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:50:47 +, Angus Leeming
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just uploaded a version for Fedora Core 3 to the wiki page.
http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx
Happy converting.
Angus,
Your script make_tex2lyx_dist fails in my case (Mandrake
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:39:23 +, Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your script make_tex2lyx_dist fails in my case (Mandrake 10.1):
The following problems have been detected by configure.
Please check the messages below before running 'make'.
(see the section
directory
`/home/psmith/Desktop/lyx-1.4.0cvs/build-tex2lyx/boost/libs/filesystem/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/psmith/Desktop/lyx-1.4.0cvs/build-tex2lyx/boost/libs/filesystem'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/psmith
directory
`/home/psmith/Desktop/lyx-1.4.0cvs/build-tex2lyx/boost/libs/filesystem/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/psmith/Desktop/lyx-1.4.0cvs/build-tex2lyx/boost/libs/filesystem'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:36:25 +, Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you post the detailed compiler error. Maybe continue this discussion
on the lyx-devel list?
Angus,
I can send you the detailed compiler error, as long as you teach me
what it is specifically, as, since I am not a
Paul Smith wrote:
Could you post the detailed compiler error. Maybe continue this
discussion on the lyx-devel list?
Angus,
I can send you the detailed compiler error, as long as you teach me
what it is specifically, as, since I am not a programmer, I do not
know exactly what you mean.
Angus Leeming wrote:
I've just uploaded a version for Fedora Core 3 to the wiki page.
http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx
Happy converting.
The above refers specifically to Red Hat. The same page has a Windows
version.
I took a chance and installed that. Unfortunately, I get the same
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:48:36 +, Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'make' controls the process of building the package by delegating the
compilation of individual files to a C++ compiler. Once all files have
been compiled, it passes them all to a linker to generate the executable.
Paul Smith wrote:
Thanks, Angus, for your explanation. The log file is attached as
requested.
Extracting this from your log file:
Configuration
C++ Compiler: g++ (3.4.1)
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I.
-I../../../../../boost/libs/filesystem/src
-I../../../../src -Winvalid-pch
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:58:57 +, Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, why not just try to use the modified version of the script,
attached, which tries to do this automatically. If you find that it works,
then I'll upload it to the wiki page.
Success, Angus!
Paul
, Angus!
Excellent! So why aven't you uploaded tex2lyx_MD10.1_17Feb05.tar.gz to the
wiki yet? ;-)
Edit the wiki page, adding
*[[Attach:packages/tex2lyx_MD10.1_17Feb05.tar.gz tex2lyx for Mandrake 10.1
(17 Feb 2005, XXXkB)]].
Save (don't forget your name in the Author field) and then select
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:46:00 +, Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent! So why aven't you uploaded tex2lyx_MD10.1_17Feb05.tar.gz to the
wiki yet? ;-)
It is already uploaded.
The result of my first try with tex2lyx:
$ tex2lyx UserGuide.tex UserGuide1.lyx
Ignoring options 'T1
Paul Smith wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:46:00 +, Angus Leeming
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent! So why aven't you uploaded tex2lyx_MD10.1_17Feb05.tar.gz to
the wiki yet? ;-)
It is already uploaded.
The result of my first try with tex2lyx:
$ tex2lyx UserGuide.tex UserGuide1
code. I
have some other examples where tex2lyx does not do a perfect job.
Paul
Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:50:47 +, Angus Leeming
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've just uploaded a version for Fedora Core 3 to the wiki page.
>> http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx
>> Happy converting.
>
> Angus,
>
> Your script make_tex2lyx_dist fails in my case
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:39:23 +, Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Your script make_tex2lyx_dist fails in my case (Mandrake 10.1):
> >
> > The following problems have been detected by configure.
> > Please check the messages below before running 'make'.
> > (see the
ror 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/psmith/Desktop/lyx-1.4.0cvs/build-tex2lyx/boost/libs/filesystem/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/psmith/Desktop/lyx-1.4.0cvs/build-tex2lyx/boost/libs/filesystem'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving d
*** [convenience.lo] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory
>
`/home/psmith/Desktop/lyx-1.4.0cvs/build-tex2lyx/boost/libs/filesystem/src'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/home/psmith/Desktop/lyx-1.4.0cvs/build-tex2lyx/boost/libs/filesystem'
>
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:36:25 +, Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you post the detailed compiler error. Maybe continue this discussion
> on the lyx-devel list?
Angus,
I can send you the detailed compiler error, as long as you teach me
what it is specifically, as, since I am
Paul Smith wrote:
>> Could you post the detailed compiler error. Maybe continue this
>> discussion on the lyx-devel list?
>
> Angus,
>
> I can send you the detailed compiler error, as long as you teach me
> what it is specifically, as, since I am not a programmer, I do not
> know exactly what
Angus Leeming wrote:
I've just uploaded a version for Fedora Core 3 to the wiki page.
http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx
Happy converting.
The above refers specifically to Red Hat. The same page has a Windows
version.
I took a chance and installed that. Unfortunately, I get the same
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:48:36 +, Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 'make' controls the process of building the package by delegating the
> compilation of individual files to a C++ compiler. Once all files have
> been compiled, it passes them all to a linker to generate the executable.
Paul Smith wrote:
> Thanks, Angus, for your explanation. The log file is attached as
> requested.
Extracting this from your log file:
Configuration
C++ Compiler: g++ (3.4.1)
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I.
-I../../../../../boost/libs/filesystem/src
-I../../../../src
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:58:57 +, Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, why not just try to use the modified version of the script,
> attached, which tries to do this automatically. If you find that it works,
> then I'll upload it to the wiki page.
Success, Angus!
Paul
'll upload it to the wiki page.
>
> Success, Angus!
Excellent! So why aven't you uploaded tex2lyx_MD10.1_17Feb05.tar.gz to the
wiki yet? ;-)
Edit the wiki page, adding
*[[Attach:packages/tex2lyx_MD10.1_17Feb05.tar.gz tex2lyx for Mandrake 10.1
(17 Feb 2005, XXXkB)]].
Save (don't forget your name
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:46:00 +, Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Excellent! So why aven't you uploaded tex2lyx_MD10.1_17Feb05.tar.gz to the
> wiki yet? ;-)
It is already uploaded.
The result of my first try with tex2lyx:
$ tex2lyx UserGuide.tex > UserGuide1.lyx
I
Paul Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:46:00 +, Angus Leeming
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Excellent! So why aven't you uploaded tex2lyx_MD10.1_17Feb05.tar.gz to
>> the wiki yet? ;-)
>
> It is already uploaded.
>
> The result of my first try with t
iles and the
conversion is not perfect, in particular files with PSTricks code. I
have some other examples where tex2lyx does not do a perfect job.
Paul
I've just uploaded a version for Fedora Core 3 to the wiki page.
http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx
Happy converting.
--
Angus
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:50:47 +, Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just uploaded a version for Fedora Core 3 to the wiki page.
http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx
Happy converting.
Angus,
Your script make_tex2lyx_dist fails in my case (Mandrake 10.1):
The following
I've just uploaded a version for Fedora Core 3 to the wiki page.
http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx
Happy converting.
--
Angus
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:50:47 +, Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just uploaded a version for Fedora Core 3 to the wiki page.
http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx
Happy converting.
Angus,
Your script make_tex2lyx_dist fails in my case (Mandrake 10.1):
The following
I've just uploaded a version for Fedora Core 3 to the wiki page.
http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx
Happy converting.
--
Angus
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:50:47 +, Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just uploaded a version for Fedora Core 3 to the wiki page.
> http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx
> Happy converting.
Angus,
Your script make_tex2lyx_dist fails in my case (Mandrake 10.1):
The
Sven Schreiber wrote:
In contrast, the way you describe it, it sounds wonderful: Skip the
manual pdf-graphics-creation and just have lyx/imagemagick create the
necessary png's on the fly. Just need one .eps (like in the old
days...). That is/would be great!
It is like that also in 1.3, but:
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg This problem has been discussed several times
Georg before, but to solve it we would need an algorithm to determine
Georg wether to convert to png or pdf from a given format, and up to
Georg now nobody came up with such a beast.
I guess the
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Georg Baum wrote:
I meant: which wiki page should it be added to?
I don't know. Put it where you think it fits, if it turns out that there is
a better place people will move it.
If you create a new wiki page (anybody is welcome to do that) then please
remember to edit
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg This problem has been discussed several times
Georg before, but to solve it we would need an algorithm to determine
Georg wether to convert to png or pdf from a given format, and up to
Georg now nobody came up with
Sven Schreiber wrote:
Good point about the bitmap thing, I'm definitely a vector fan. After
looking a little at the devel mailing archives to get an idea of the
discussion: I may be wrong, but could it be that people wrongly equate
pdf=vector?
No, at least I can't remember people doing that.
Georg Baum wrote:
And this is the problem: Since converters are user definable, we don't know
wether a given eps - pdf conversion retains vector data or not.
Ok, now (I think) I understand.
True, but the optimal solution that should be implemented some day would be
to retain vector data.
But this
Sven Schreiber wrote:
In contrast, the way you describe it, it sounds wonderful: Skip the
manual pdf-graphics-creation and just have lyx/imagemagick create the
necessary png's on the fly. Just need one .eps (like in the old
days...). That is/would be great!
It is like that also in 1.3, but:
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg This problem has been discussed several times
Georg before, but to solve it we would need an algorithm to determine
Georg wether to convert to png or pdf from a given format, and up to
Georg now nobody came up with such a beast.
I guess the
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Georg Baum wrote:
I meant: which wiki page should it be added to?
I don't know. Put it where you think it fits, if it turns out that there is
a better place people will move it.
If you create a new wiki page (anybody is welcome to do that) then please
remember to edit
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg This problem has been discussed several times
Georg before, but to solve it we would need an algorithm to determine
Georg wether to convert to png or pdf from a given format, and up to
Georg now nobody came up with
Sven Schreiber wrote:
Good point about the bitmap thing, I'm definitely a vector fan. After
looking a little at the devel mailing archives to get an idea of the
discussion: I may be wrong, but could it be that people wrongly equate
pdf=vector?
No, at least I can't remember people doing that.
Georg Baum wrote:
And this is the problem: Since converters are user definable, we don't know
wether a given eps - pdf conversion retains vector data or not.
Ok, now (I think) I understand.
True, but the optimal solution that should be implemented some day would be
to retain vector data.
But this
Sven Schreiber wrote:
> In contrast, the way you describe it, it sounds wonderful: Skip the
> manual pdf-graphics-creation and just have lyx/imagemagick create the
> necessary png's on the fly. Just need one .eps (like in the old
> days...). That is/would be great!
It is like that also in 1.3,
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> This problem has been discussed several times
Georg> before, but to solve it we would need an algorithm to determine
Georg> wether to convert to png or pdf from a given format, and up to
Georg> now nobody came up with such a beast.
I
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Georg Baum wrote:
> > I meant: which wiki page should it be added to?
>
> I don't know. Put it where you think it fits, if it turns out that there is
> a better place people will move it.
If you create a new wiki page (anybody is welcome to do that) then please
remember to
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> This problem has been discussed several times
Georg> before, but to solve it we would need an algorithm to determine
Georg> wether to convert to png or pdf from a given format, and up to
Georg> now nobody came up
Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Good point about the bitmap thing, I'm definitely a vector fan. After
> looking a little at the devel mailing archives to get an idea of the
> discussion: I may be wrong, but could it be that people wrongly equate
> pdf=vector?
No, at least I can't remember people doing
Georg Baum wrote:
And this is the problem: Since converters are user definable, we don't know
wether a given eps -> pdf conversion retains vector data or not.
Ok, now (I think) I understand.
True, but the optimal solution that should be implemented some day would be
to retain vector data.
But this
Paul Smith wrote:
Thanks, Angus, for your reply to my question. Meanwhile, I had the
idea of installing LyX 1.4 cvs and getting tex2lyx. Afterwards, can I
get back to LyX 1.3.5 and using tex2lyx without LyX 1.4? Does my idea
make some sense?
Here's what I did on Windows.
Checked out the LyX
On 3.02.05, Angus Leeming wrote:
Here's what I did on Windows.
Maybe I missed the start of this thread, but at least the last 7+ messages
did not reveal where I can find tex2lyx for *Linux*.
Is it possible to use tex2lyx and lyx2lyx with LyX 1.3.4 on Linux?
Are these scripts standalone
G. Milde wrote:
On 3.02.05, Angus Leeming wrote:
Here's what I did on Windows.
Maybe I missed the start of this thread, but at least the last 7+
messages did not reveal where I can find tex2lyx for *Linux*.
You can't *find* it. Read my reply to the original question.
http
Georg Baum wrote:
- I use pdflatex but don't specify the .pdf-extension so that I can
switch to normal latex (using .eps) seamlessly; tex2lyx applies a
definite choice, thereby destroying this nice portability. Why?
Because LyX 1.4 _always_ needs the extension: There is always one master
in the .tex file to maintain
portability, but it needs it in the .lyx file.
That's great, I didn't know that. I agree it's the right thing to do. Is
it documented somewhere? (well, probably in the main user guide?)
I don't know.
Therefore tex2lyx looks for existing files and adds
and then tex2lyx (and that
doesn't exist yet)?
The fact that tex2lyx creates an additional ERT for \bibliographystyle that
should be deleted.
I meant: which wiki page should it be added to?
-sven
Paul Smith wrote:
Thanks, Angus, for your reply to my question. Meanwhile, I had the
idea of installing LyX 1.4 cvs and getting tex2lyx. Afterwards, can I
get back to LyX 1.3.5 and using tex2lyx without LyX 1.4? Does my idea
make some sense?
Here's what I did on Windows.
Checked out the LyX
On 3.02.05, Angus Leeming wrote:
Here's what I did on Windows.
Maybe I missed the start of this thread, but at least the last 7+ messages
did not reveal where I can find tex2lyx for *Linux*.
Is it possible to use tex2lyx and lyx2lyx with LyX 1.3.4 on Linux?
Are these scripts standalone
G. Milde wrote:
On 3.02.05, Angus Leeming wrote:
Here's what I did on Windows.
Maybe I missed the start of this thread, but at least the last 7+
messages did not reveal where I can find tex2lyx for *Linux*.
You can't *find* it. Read my reply to the original question.
http
Georg Baum wrote:
- I use pdflatex but don't specify the .pdf-extension so that I can
switch to normal latex (using .eps) seamlessly; tex2lyx applies a
definite choice, thereby destroying this nice portability. Why?
Because LyX 1.4 _always_ needs the extension: There is always one master
in the .tex file to maintain
portability, but it needs it in the .lyx file.
That's great, I didn't know that. I agree it's the right thing to do. Is
it documented somewhere? (well, probably in the main user guide?)
I don't know.
Therefore tex2lyx looks for existing files and adds
and then tex2lyx (and that
doesn't exist yet)?
The fact that tex2lyx creates an additional ERT for \bibliographystyle that
should be deleted.
I meant: which wiki page should it be added to?
-sven
Paul Smith wrote:
> Thanks, Angus, for your reply to my question. Meanwhile, I had the
> idea of installing LyX 1.4 cvs and getting tex2lyx. Afterwards, can I
> get back to LyX 1.3.5 and using tex2lyx without LyX 1.4? Does my idea
> make some sense?
Here's what I did on Windows.
On 3.02.05, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> Here's what I did on Windows.
Maybe I missed the start of this thread, but at least the last 7+ messages
did not reveal where I can find tex2lyx for *Linux*.
Is it possible to use tex2lyx and lyx2lyx with LyX 1.3.4 on Linux?
Are these scripts stan
G. Milde wrote:
> On 3.02.05, Angus Leeming wrote:
>>
>> Here's what I did on Windows.
>
> Maybe I missed the start of this thread, but at least the last 7+
> messages did not reveal where I can find tex2lyx for *Linux*.
You can't *find* it. Read my reply to the ori
Georg Baum wrote:
- I use pdflatex but don't specify the .pdf-extension so that I can
switch to normal latex (using .eps) seamlessly; tex2lyx applies a
definite choice, thereby destroying this nice portability. Why?
Because LyX 1.4 _always_ needs the extension: There is always one "m
>> needed. LyX will not output the extension in the .tex file to maintain
>> portability, but it needs it in the .lyx file.
>
> That's great, I didn't know that. I agree it's the right thing to do. Is
> it documented somewhere? (well, probably in the main user guide?)
I don't
!
Which one? The one I suggested about relyx and then tex2lyx (and that
doesn't exist yet)?
The fact that tex2lyx creates an additional ERT for \bibliographystyle that
should be deleted.
I meant: which wiki page should it be added to?
-sven
Dear All
I remember Angus has recently produced a version of tex2lyx for MS
Windows. Is there a Linux version of it to run autonomously, that is,
without having LyX 1.4 cvs installed?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
I would be interested too.. I would also be interested
in a tex2lyx standalone (ie. would run without one
having lyx in his system) if this is possible. I just
downloaded Angus's tex2lyx but Im not sure if it works
for window users who installed lyx using cygwin (I
didnt tried other lyx versions
Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All
I remember Angus has recently produced a version of tex2lyx for MS
Windows. Is there a Linux version of it to run autonomously, that is,
without having LyX 1.4 cvs installed?
No, because different flavours of linux have different run time libraries
and a single
Jose Capco wrote:
I would be interested too.. I would also be interested
in a tex2lyx standalone (ie. would run without one
having lyx in his system) if this is possible. I just
downloaded Angus's tex2lyx but Im not sure if it works
for window users who installed lyx using cygwin (I
didnt
No! In fact I even installed Ruurd Reitsma's port just
to test this and it didnt worked
I installed the windows port in C:\Lyx directory.. and
then extracted the file in the tex2lyx zipfile you
posted today to their respective paths and then after
running I got something like
--
Unable
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 13:31, you wrote:
No!
Ach!
In fact I even installed Ruurd Reitsma's port just
to test this and it didnt worked
Why did you think you needed this?
I installed the windows port in C:\Lyx directory.. and
then extracted the file in the tex2lyx zipfile you
In fact I even installed Ruurd Reitsma's port just
to test this and it didnt worked
Why did you think you needed this?
you told me that the cygwin thingy isn't recognized.
Just a second. tex2lyx expects to find the support
files in a
directory ..\Resources\lyx relative
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 15:58, Jose Capco wrote:
'import site' failed; use -v for traceback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File C:\LyX\Resources\lyx\lyx2lyx\lyx2lyx, line
19, in ?
import getopt
ImportError: No module named getopt
Last time we saw this error this was the
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 15:58, Jose Capco wrote:
'import site' failed; use -v for traceback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File C:\LyX\Resources\lyx\lyx2lyx\lyx2lyx, line
19, in ?
import getopt
ImportError: No module named getopt
Last time we saw this error this
Sven Schreiber wrote:
ImportError: No module named getopt
Last time we saw this error this was the result of a bad or incomplete
python installation.
Actually it's the stripped-down python version always installed by the
LyxWin package. Due to PATH settings it can get called even though a
out where I think the error message
stems from. And that it seems to me that renaming lyx2lyx to
lyx2lyx.py as was discussed before will not remedy the fact that the
bundled-with-Ruurds-lyxwin python doesn't seem to handle it.
btw, another thing I very much appreciate is your tex2lyx snapshot
LaTeX. I wonder how to
go through newcommand stuffs in the preamble, putting
that in the preamble, I'll try to start all over and
write the preamble in lyx itself and not tex2lyx yet.
If you have lyx2lyx working, you should be able to put everything into the
preamble that you like. tex2lyx
ok great.. so I'll just wait until the 1.4.x comes up
and the python er... anyway I'll just let 1.3.x import
the 1.4.x lyxs which are still readable (but
probably... Im not sure though, that after relyxing
things would look better).
and also, if the owner of this mailing list also reads
this...
I'd love to be the guinea pig.. the boss cant write
with LaTeX and this is the only way out. I'll send
feedbacks.
Jose Capco
PS: I'll try experimenting on importing packages and
using \newcommands on the preamble.. if anyone knows
that this work then please advise.
--- Georg Baum [EMAIL
Sven Schreiber wrote:
btw, another thing I very much appreciate is your tex2lyx snapshot. In
fact I am using it right now to avoid my earlier relyx-problems. What
I'm not sure about: Would you like users (like me) to give feedback now,
or will testing start later on?
Feedback is good. Apart
Angus Leeming wrote:
Sven Schreiber wrote:
btw, another thing I very much appreciate is your tex2lyx snapshot. In
fact I am using it right now to avoid my earlier relyx-problems. What
I'm not sure about: Would you like users (like me) to give feedback now,
or will testing start later on?
Feedback
Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2005 19:03 schrieb Jose Capco:
and also, if the owner of this mailing list also reads
this... could you please setup the listbot to send the
emails so that when I hit the reply button it will
send to the list rather than the individul users (I
think that is possible,
!?).
Georg has just committed another fix. Apparently a '\n' character became
\\n. I'll try and upload a new version.
And I ended up using absolute paths everywhere for includegraphics as a
simple workaround, because relative ones didn't work (tex2lyx complained
couldn't find).
Almost certainly
Thanks, Angus, for your reply to my question. Meanwhile, I had the
idea of installing LyX 1.4 cvs and getting tex2lyx. Afterwards, can I
get back to LyX 1.3.5 and using tex2lyx without LyX 1.4? Does my idea
make some sense?
Paul
.eps) seamlessly; tex2lyx applies a
definite choice, thereby destroying this nice portability. Why?
Because LyX 1.4 _always_ needs the extension: There is always one master
version of the graphic that is referenced in the .lyx file. The others
are created by the converter mechanism from
Dear All
I remember Angus has recently produced a version of tex2lyx for MS
Windows. Is there a Linux version of it to run autonomously, that is,
without having LyX 1.4 cvs installed?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
I would be interested too.. I would also be interested
in a tex2lyx standalone (ie. would run without one
having lyx in his system) if this is possible. I just
downloaded Angus's tex2lyx but Im not sure if it works
for window users who installed lyx using cygwin (I
didnt tried other lyx versions
Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All
I remember Angus has recently produced a version of tex2lyx for MS
Windows. Is there a Linux version of it to run autonomously, that is,
without having LyX 1.4 cvs installed?
No, because different flavours of linux have different run time libraries
and a single
401 - 500 of 633 matches
Mail list logo
