That's true for most OS X users, but not all.
If you want to use multi-platform programs, you have to put up with a
certain amount of non-Mac behavior. (As do Windows and Linux users, when
using programs primarily written to run on a different system.)
I'm just glad that LyX is available on OS
On Dec 29, 2013, at 3:13 AM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote:
That's true for most OS X users, but not all.
If you want to use multi-platform programs, you have to put up with a certain
amount of non-Mac behavior. (As do Windows and Linux users, when using
programs primarily
That's true for most OS X users, but not all.
If you want to use multi-platform programs, you have to put up with a
certain amount of non-Mac behavior. (As do Windows and Linux users, when
using programs primarily written to run on a different system.)
I'm just glad that LyX is available on OS
On Dec 29, 2013, at 3:13 AM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote:
That's true for most OS X users, but not all.
If you want to use multi-platform programs, you have to put up with a certain
amount of non-Mac behavior. (As do Windows and Linux users, when using
programs primarily
That's true for most OS X users, but not all.
If you want to use multi-platform programs, you have to put up with a
certain amount of non-Mac behavior. (As do Windows and Linux users, when
using programs primarily written to run on a different system.)
I'm just glad that LyX is available on OS
On Dec 29, 2013, at 3:13 AM, Richard Talley wrote:
> That's true for most OS X users, but not all.
>
> If you want to use multi-platform programs, you have to put up with a certain
> amount of non-Mac behavior. (As do Windows and Linux users, when using
> programs
On 2013-12-27 04:37, Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com wrote:
If you know the filename, why don't you access a command prompt and
type:
locate filename | more
I guess theoretically you might have to install some stuff to do that,
but it's a wise investment.
Works out of the box on Mac OSX
Richard Talley rich.talley at gmail.com writes:
I'm not quite ready to upgrade to Mavericks, but this technique is so
fundamental to how OS X has worked since the very beginning I can't see
Apple removing it. My search also came up empty on your issue.
Try this instead:
Open a
Happy New Year to you too. Glad you were able to find the LyX example files
you were looking for.
Spotlight doesn't index inside application bundles, so the Finder search
behavior you describe is normal on OS X. Users normally wouldn't need to be
searching inside bundles; the situation with the
On Dec 26, 2013, at 4:29 PM, justin justina...@yahoo.com wrote:
On the Mac installation, they get buried inside of the app package.
Find LyX.app in your applications folder
Right click on it and select show package contentsThe go to Contents -
Resources - examples
It might be a good
On 2013-12-27 04:37, Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com wrote:
If you know the filename, why don't you access a command prompt and
type:
locate filename | more
I guess theoretically you might have to install some stuff to do that,
but it's a wise investment.
Works out of the box on Mac OSX
Richard Talley rich.talley at gmail.com writes:
I'm not quite ready to upgrade to Mavericks, but this technique is so
fundamental to how OS X has worked since the very beginning I can't see
Apple removing it. My search also came up empty on your issue.
Try this instead:
Open a
Happy New Year to you too. Glad you were able to find the LyX example files
you were looking for.
Spotlight doesn't index inside application bundles, so the Finder search
behavior you describe is normal on OS X. Users normally wouldn't need to be
searching inside bundles; the situation with the
On Dec 26, 2013, at 4:29 PM, justin justina...@yahoo.com wrote:
On the Mac installation, they get buried inside of the app package.
Find LyX.app in your applications folder
Right click on it and select show package contentsThe go to Contents -
Resources - examples
It might be a good
On 2013-12-27 04:37, "Steve Litt" wrote:
>If you know the filename, why don't you access a command prompt and
>type:
>
>locate filename | more
>
>I guess theoretically you might have to install some stuff to do that,
>but it's a wise investment.
Works out of the box
Richard Talley gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
> I'm not quite ready to upgrade to Mavericks, but this technique is so
fundamental to how OS X has worked since the very beginning I can't see
Apple removing it. My search also came up empty on your issue.
>
> Try this instead:
>
>
>
> Open a
Happy New Year to you too. Glad you were able to find the LyX example files
you were looking for.
Spotlight doesn't index inside application bundles, so the Finder search
behavior you describe is normal on OS X. Users normally wouldn't need to be
searching inside bundles; the situation with the
On Dec 26, 2013, at 4:29 PM, justin wrote:
>
>> On the Mac installation, they get buried inside of the app package.
>>
>> Find LyX.app in your applications folder
>> Right click on it and select "show package contents"The go to Contents ->
> Resources -> examples
>> It
On the Mac installation, they get buried inside of the app package.
Find LyX.app in your applications folder
Right click on it and select show package contentsThe go to Contents -
Resources - examples
It might be a good idea to copy the folder to somewhere more convenient
outside of the app
A completely empty folder? Or a folder containing a folder named 'Contents'?
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 4:29 PM, justin justina...@yahoo.com wrote:
On the Mac installation, they get buried inside of the app package.
Find LyX.app in your applications folder
Right click on it and select
Richard Talley rich.talley at gmail.com writes:
A completely empty folder? Or a folder containing a folder named 'Contents'?
Thanks for coming back so quickly! Completely empty. Nothing in it
whatsoever. That's what it shows using that method anyway. I would really
love to find it,
That's a stumper - an empty app would have nothing to run. If LyX actually
runs, then the app can't possibly be empty.
In OS X, the Finder presents an app as a single file, but it's actually an
application bundle that contains the executable and other resources (in the
case of LyX the other
That's a stumper - an empty app would have nothing to run. If LyX actually
runs, then the app can't possibly be empty.
In OS X, the Finder presents an app as a single file, but it's actually an
application bundle that contains the executable and other resources (in the
case of LyX the
I'm not quite ready to upgrade to Mavericks, but this technique is so
fundamental to how OS X has worked since the very beginning I can't see
Apple removing it. My search also came up empty on your issue.
Try this instead:
Open a Finder window, pull down the 'Go' menu and choose the 'Go to
On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 23:48:41 + (UTC)
justin justina...@yahoo.com wrote:
Richard Talley rich.talley at gmail.com writes:
A completely empty folder? Or a folder containing a folder named
'Contents'?
Thanks for coming back so quickly! Completely empty. Nothing in it
On the Mac installation, they get buried inside of the app package.
Find LyX.app in your applications folder
Right click on it and select show package contentsThe go to Contents -
Resources - examples
It might be a good idea to copy the folder to somewhere more convenient
outside of the app
A completely empty folder? Or a folder containing a folder named 'Contents'?
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 4:29 PM, justin justina...@yahoo.com wrote:
On the Mac installation, they get buried inside of the app package.
Find LyX.app in your applications folder
Right click on it and select
Richard Talley rich.talley at gmail.com writes:
A completely empty folder? Or a folder containing a folder named 'Contents'?
Thanks for coming back so quickly! Completely empty. Nothing in it
whatsoever. That's what it shows using that method anyway. I would really
love to find it,
That's a stumper - an empty app would have nothing to run. If LyX actually
runs, then the app can't possibly be empty.
In OS X, the Finder presents an app as a single file, but it's actually an
application bundle that contains the executable and other resources (in the
case of LyX the other
That's a stumper - an empty app would have nothing to run. If LyX actually
runs, then the app can't possibly be empty.
In OS X, the Finder presents an app as a single file, but it's actually an
application bundle that contains the executable and other resources (in the
case of LyX the
I'm not quite ready to upgrade to Mavericks, but this technique is so
fundamental to how OS X has worked since the very beginning I can't see
Apple removing it. My search also came up empty on your issue.
Try this instead:
Open a Finder window, pull down the 'Go' menu and choose the 'Go to
On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 23:48:41 + (UTC)
justin justina...@yahoo.com wrote:
Richard Talley rich.talley at gmail.com writes:
A completely empty folder? Or a folder containing a folder named
'Contents'?
Thanks for coming back so quickly! Completely empty. Nothing in it
> On the Mac installation, they get buried inside of the app package.
>
> Find LyX.app in your applications folder
> Right click on it and select "show package contents"The go to Contents ->
Resources -> examples
> It might be a good idea to copy the folder to somewhere more convenient
outside
A completely empty folder? Or a folder containing a folder named 'Contents'?
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 4:29 PM, justin wrote:
>
> > On the Mac installation, they get buried inside of the app package.
> >
> > Find LyX.app in your applications folder
> > Right click on it
Richard Talley gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
> A completely empty folder? Or a folder containing a folder named 'Contents'?
>
>
Thanks for coming back so quickly! Completely empty. Nothing in it
whatsoever. That's what it shows using that method anyway. I would really
love to find it, so I can
That's a stumper - an empty app would have nothing to run. If LyX actually
runs, then the app can't possibly be empty.
In OS X, the Finder presents an app as a single file, but it's actually an
application bundle that contains the executable and other resources (in the
case of LyX the other
>
> That's a stumper - an empty app would have nothing to run. If LyX actually
runs, then the app can't possibly be empty.
>
>
>
> In OS X, the Finder presents an app as a single file, but it's actually an
application bundle that contains the executable and other resources (in the
case of LyX
I'm not quite ready to upgrade to Mavericks, but this technique is so
fundamental to how OS X has worked since the very beginning I can't see
Apple removing it. My search also came up empty on your issue.
Try this instead:
Open a Finder window, pull down the 'Go' menu and choose the 'Go to
On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 23:48:41 + (UTC)
justin wrote:
> Richard Talley gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > A completely empty folder? Or a folder containing a folder named
> > 'Contents'?
> >
> >
>
>
> Thanks for coming back so quickly! Completely empty. Nothing
I am new to LyX and cannot find the sample files described in the
Tutorial.pdf:
Finally, we have written a file called example_raw.lyx to let you
practice
your LYX skills. Imagine that it was typed by someone who did not know
about any of LYX’s great features. As you learn new LYX functions,
On Oct 3, 2013, at 9:05 PM, Paul Meehl wrote:
I am new to LyX and cannot find the sample files described in the
Tutorial.pdf:
Finally, we have written a file called example_raw.lyx to let you practice
your LYX skills. Imagine that it was typed by someone who did not know
about any of
I am new to LyX and cannot find the sample files described in the
Tutorial.pdf:
Finally, we have written a file called example_raw.lyx to let you
practice
your LYX skills. Imagine that it was typed by someone who did not know
about any of LYX’s great features. As you learn new LYX functions,
On Oct 3, 2013, at 9:05 PM, Paul Meehl wrote:
I am new to LyX and cannot find the sample files described in the
Tutorial.pdf:
Finally, we have written a file called example_raw.lyx to let you practice
your LYX skills. Imagine that it was typed by someone who did not know
about any of
I am new to LyX and cannot find the sample files described in the
Tutorial.pdf:
Finally, we have written a file called example_raw.lyx to let you
practice
your LYX skills. Imagine that it was typed by someone who did not know
about any of LYX’s great features. As you learn new LYX functions,
On Oct 3, 2013, at 9:05 PM, Paul Meehl wrote:
> I am new to LyX and cannot find the sample files described in the
> Tutorial.pdf:
>
>Finally, we have written a file called example_raw.lyx to let you practice
> your LYX skills. Imagine that it was typed by someone who did not know
> about
45 matches
Mail list logo