http://www.lyx.org/Donate
On Monday 26 July 2010 16:55:59 Paul Rubin wrote:
http://www.lyx.org/Donate
Done. Thanks!
SteveT
Steve Litt
Recession Relief Package
http://www.recession-relief.US
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/stevelitt
Hi all,
Does LyX have a Paypal account to which I can contribute some money? I know
you have bounties for future features, but I'd like to contribute for already
contributed features such as character styles, outline mode, and the latest
LyX feature to make my life easier -- interactive math.
http://www.lyx.org/Donate
On Monday 26 July 2010 16:55:59 Paul Rubin wrote:
http://www.lyx.org/Donate
Done. Thanks!
SteveT
Steve Litt
Recession Relief Package
http://www.recession-relief.US
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/stevelitt
Hi all,
Does LyX have a Paypal account to which I can contribute some money? I know
you have bounties for future features, but I'd like to contribute for already
contributed features such as character styles, outline mode, and the latest
LyX feature to make my life easier -- interactive math.
http://www.lyx.org/Donate
On Monday 26 July 2010 16:55:59 Paul Rubin wrote:
> http://www.lyx.org/Donate
>
Done. Thanks!
SteveT
Steve Litt
Recession Relief Package
http://www.recession-relief.US
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/stevelitt
of Lyx. If I spellcheck a document and Lyx
finds a new word, the mouse over message for the add button says add to
personal dictionary. Everything seems to work fine, except that after I
close the document there is no file called mydic where I instructed Lyx
to put it (there is no file
I just confirmed that on Mint (Linux), LyX 1.6.4 ignores the personal dictionary
setting when using aspell. (I did not try any other spelling checkers.) There
also appear to be a couple of other bugs involving the associated dialog. I've
reported all the bugs. Meanwhile, as Stephen said,
of Lyx. If I spellcheck a document and Lyx
finds a new word, the mouse over message for the add button says add to
personal dictionary. Everything seems to work fine, except that after I
close the document there is no file called mydic where I instructed Lyx
to put it (there is no file
I just confirmed that on Mint (Linux), LyX 1.6.4 ignores the personal dictionary
setting when using aspell. (I did not try any other spelling checkers.) There
also appear to be a couple of other bugs involving the associated dialog. I've
reported all the bugs. Meanwhile, as Stephen said,
llchecker|
> personal dictionary box of Lyx. If I spellcheck a document and Lyx
> finds a new word, the mouse over message for the add button says "add to
> personal dictionary". Everything seems to work fine, except that after I
> close the document there is no file c
I just confirmed that on Mint (Linux), LyX 1.6.4 ignores the personal dictionary
setting when using aspell. (I did not try any other spelling checkers.) There
also appear to be a couple of other bugs involving the associated dialog. I've
reported all the bugs. Meanwhile, as Stephen said,
|preferences|spellchecker|
personal dictionary box of Lyx. If I spellcheck a document and Lyx
finds a new word, the mouse over message for the add button says add to
personal dictionary. Everything seems to work fine, except that after I
close the document there is no file called mydic where I instructed
|preferences|spellchecker|
personal dictionary box of Lyx. If I spellcheck a document and Lyx
finds a new word, the mouse over message for the add button says add to
personal dictionary. Everything seems to work fine, except that after I
close the document there is no file called mydic where I instructed
|preferences|spellchecker|
personal dictionary box of Lyx. If I spellcheck a document and Lyx
finds a new word, the mouse over message for the add button says "add to
personal dictionary". Everything seems to work fine, except that after I
close the document there is no file called myd
If I set custom margins (in document settings), where are the margins
measured from? I thought from the edge of the paper as defined in document
setings, but this doesn't seem to be so. I'm using komascript book class.
Richard
Am 21.03.2010 14:10, schrieb Richard Brown:
If I set custom margins (in document settings), where are the margins
measured from? I thought from the edge of the paper as defined in document
setings, but this doesn't seem to be so.
Yes, the margins are calculated using a default margin of 1
Richard Brown wrote:
If I set custom margins (in document settings), where are the margins
measured from? I thought from the edge of the paper as defined in document
setings, but this doesn't seem to be so. I'm using komascript book class.
You're correct for article and report classes. I
If I set custom margins (in document settings), where are the margins
measured from? I thought from the edge of the paper as defined in document
setings, but this doesn't seem to be so. I'm using komascript book class.
Richard
Am 21.03.2010 14:10, schrieb Richard Brown:
If I set custom margins (in document settings), where are the margins
measured from? I thought from the edge of the paper as defined in document
setings, but this doesn't seem to be so.
Yes, the margins are calculated using a default margin of 1
Richard Brown wrote:
If I set custom margins (in document settings), where are the margins
measured from? I thought from the edge of the paper as defined in document
setings, but this doesn't seem to be so. I'm using komascript book class.
You're correct for article and report classes. I
If I set custom margins (in document settings), where are the margins
measured from? I thought from the edge of the paper as defined in document
setings, but this doesn't seem to be so. I'm using komascript book class.
Richard
Am 21.03.2010 14:10, schrieb Richard Brown:
If I set custom margins (in document settings), where are the margins
measured from? I thought from the edge of the paper as defined in document
setings, but this doesn't seem to be so.
Yes, the margins are calculated using a default margin of 1
Richard Brown wrote:
If I set custom margins (in document settings), where are the margins
measured from? I thought from the edge of the paper as defined in document
setings, but this doesn't seem to be so. I'm using komascript book class.
You're correct for article and report classes. I
someone tell what that might be and where one could get it, please?
Is it a selfcooked .cls? (But that would not be presented as example
files, I suppose)
regards, joachim
--
Mac BacicTeX 2009 - TeXShop 2.29 / TeXworks 0.2.3
LyX 1.6.5 - MacBook Pro intel OSX 10.4.11 Tiger
someone tell what that might be and where one could get it, please?
Is it a selfcooked .cls? (But that would not be presented as example
files, I suppose)
regards, joachim
--
Mac BacicTeX 2009 - TeXShop 2.29 / TeXworks 0.2.3
LyX 1.6.5 - MacBook Pro intel OSX 10.4.11 Tiger
someone tell what that might be and where one could get it, please?
Is it a selfcooked .cls? (But that would not be presented as example
files, I suppose)
regards, joachim
--
Mac BacicTeX 2009 - TeXShop 2.29 / TeXworks 0.2.3
LyX 1.6.5 - MacBook Pro intel OSX 10.4.11 Tiger
is used, insert a \newpage.
Any pointers of where to find a solution to this would be appreciated.
--
Philip Stubbs
Philip Stubbs wrote:
I have an element that I don't want to appear at the bottom of a page.
Therefore, I need to test to find out how far down the page I am, and
if more than 75% of the page is used, insert a \newpage.
One possibility:
On 01/25/2010 04:52 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
% Conditional pagebreak
\def\condbreak#1{%
\vskip 0pt plus #1\pagebreak[3]\vskip 0pt plus -#1\relax}
As a related question: What does \relax do, and when does one need it?
rh
rgheck wrote:
As a related question: What does \relax do, and when does one need it?
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/TeX/relax
Note, though, that the \condbreak macro is not my doing. I've picked it up
eventually on comp.text.tex.
Jürgen
On 01/25/2010 07:59 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
rgheck wrote:
As a related question: What does \relax do, and when does one need it?
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/TeX/relax
Thanks. I thought it must be something like that.
rh
is used, insert a \newpage.
Any pointers of where to find a solution to this would be appreciated.
--
Philip Stubbs
Philip Stubbs wrote:
I have an element that I don't want to appear at the bottom of a page.
Therefore, I need to test to find out how far down the page I am, and
if more than 75% of the page is used, insert a \newpage.
One possibility:
On 01/25/2010 04:52 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
% Conditional pagebreak
\def\condbreak#1{%
\vskip 0pt plus #1\pagebreak[3]\vskip 0pt plus -#1\relax}
As a related question: What does \relax do, and when does one need it?
rh
rgheck wrote:
As a related question: What does \relax do, and when does one need it?
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/TeX/relax
Note, though, that the \condbreak macro is not my doing. I've picked it up
eventually on comp.text.tex.
Jürgen
On 01/25/2010 07:59 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
rgheck wrote:
As a related question: What does \relax do, and when does one need it?
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/TeX/relax
Thanks. I thought it must be something like that.
rh
is used, insert a \newpage.
Any pointers of where to find a solution to this would be appreciated.
--
Philip Stubbs
Philip Stubbs wrote:
> I have an element that I don't want to appear at the bottom of a page.
> Therefore, I need to test to find out how far down the page I am, and
> if more than 75% of the page is used, insert a \newpage.
One possibility:
On 01/25/2010 04:52 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
% Conditional pagebreak
\def\condbreak#1{%
\vskip 0pt plus #1\pagebreak[3]\vskip 0pt plus -#1\relax}
As a related question: What does \relax do, and when does one need it?
rh
rgheck wrote:
> As a related question: What does \relax do, and when does one need it?
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/TeX/relax
Note, though, that the \condbreak macro is not my doing. I've picked it up
eventually on comp.text.tex.
Jürgen
On 01/25/2010 07:59 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
rgheck wrote:
As a related question: What does \relax do, and when does one need it?
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/TeX/relax
Thanks. I thought it must be something like that.
rh
to clean? how to restart?
Thx
Peter
Ubuntu 9.10 repository provides texlive-2007 .deb packages. They are old.
Installing the new texlive-2009 (it includes circuitikz) is a good thing.
Here is a quickinstall
http://www.tug.org/texlive/quickinstall.html
where you can read
- 'How to acquire
Ubuntu 9.10 repository provides texlive-2007 .deb packages. They are old.
Installing the new texlive-2009 (it includes circuitikz) is a good thing.
Here is a quickinstall
http://www.tug.org/texlive/quickinstall.html
where you can read
- 'How to acquire the software'
(http://www.tug.org
peter kint peter_k...@... writes:
- 'Running the installer' or 'GUI installer' and
- 'Post-install: setting the PATH' (it's essential: see 3.4.3/3.4.4 in the
full info page http://www.tug.org/texlive/doc/texlive-en/texlive-en.html)
This sounds like music to me.
I had read the
The directory of the binaries for your platform must be added to
the search path.
Are you a single user? Then you can add the following lines
PATH=/usr/local/texlive/2009/bin/x86_64-linux:$PATH; export PATH
MANPATH=/usr/local/texlive/2009/texmf/doc/man:$MANPATH; export MANPATH
peter kint peter_k...@... writes:
I am about to type i (for installation) and I see in the output the following:
D directories:
TEXDIR (the main TeX directory):
!! default location: /usr/local/texlive/2009
!! is not writable, please select a different one!
Should I first
Sigh,
I'm almost desperate.
I followed all your instructions. He told me that installation was done. I
changed PATHS. And this is what I get:
pe...@peter-desktop:~$ tex --version
TeX 3.141592 (Web2C 7.5.6)
kpathsea version 3.5.6
Copyright 2007 D.E. Knuth.
Kpathsea is copyright 2007 Karl Berry
Am Sonntag 20 Dezember 2009 schrieb peter kint:
Sigh,
I'm almost desperate.
I followed all your instructions. He told me that installation was done. I
changed PATHS. And this is what I get:
pe...@peter-desktop:~$ tex --version
...
Version 2007.
Do I have two versions now and is he
On Sunday 20 December 2009 12:22:13 peter kint wrote:
Sigh,
I'm almost desperate.
I followed all your instructions. He told me that installation was done. I
changed PATHS. And this is what I get:
pe...@peter-desktop:~$ tex --version
TeX 3.141592 (Web2C 7.5.6)
kpathsea version 3.5.6
Steve Litt sl...@... writes:
Anything's possible. Why not investigate, starting with this command at the
command prompt:
locate tex | grep /tex$
Hi, thx for replying. Here are my outputs
Try running each of them, find out which you want, and then strongarm LyX to
specify that one.
Kornel Benko kornel.be...@... writes:
You have to set your PATH appropriatelly.
which tex gives here:
/usr/local/texlive/2009/bin/x86_64-linux/tex
This path has to be _before_ the path of your standard-installed tex (which is
/usr/bin in your case)
which tex gives:
On 12/20/2009 10:31 AM, Ignacio Garcia wrote:
peter kintpeter_k...@... writes:
I am about to type i (for installation) and I see in the output the following:
D directories:
TEXDIR (the main TeX directory):
!! default location: /usr/local/texlive/2009
!! is not writable,
Graphical? Type in terminal:
sudo nautilus
Go to the /usr/local , Create folder and name it texlive
Then do right click on the created and
Properties Permission and change Owner and Group by your user name.
I wouldn't recommend this. Stuff in the /usr/local/ hierarchy isn't
want to figure out where to put this thing. So run locate
/latex.ltx as a way of finding out where your base TeX
installation is. I see:
[rgh...@rghquad tmp]$ locate /latex.ltx
/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx
This tells me that my main TeX tree is at /usr/share
rgheck rgh...@... writes:
Here are the steps to follow.
Richard
Halleluia!
What a massive piece of help (and an instructive tex-course too)!
IT WORKZ! FINALLY!
I owe you eternal gratitude :-)
Can I post your lecture in an other forum too (ubuntuforums.org), evidently with
proper
peter kint peter_k...@... writes:
Kornel Benko kornel.be...@... writes:
You have to set your PATH appropriatelly.
which tex gives here:
/usr/local/texlive/2009/bin/x86_64-linux/tex
This path has to be _before_ the path of your standard-installed
tex (which is
/usr/bin in
On 12/20/2009 03:41 PM, peter kint wrote:
rgheckrgh...@... writes:
Here are the steps to follow.
Richard
Halleluia!
What a massive piece of help (and an instructive tex-course too)!
IT WORKZ! FINALLY!
I owe you eternal gratitude :-)
Can I post your lecture in an
to clean? how to restart?
Thx
Peter
Ubuntu 9.10 repository provides texlive-2007 .deb packages. They are old.
Installing the new texlive-2009 (it includes circuitikz) is a good thing.
Here is a quickinstall
http://www.tug.org/texlive/quickinstall.html
where you can read
- 'How to acquire
Ubuntu 9.10 repository provides texlive-2007 .deb packages. They are old.
Installing the new texlive-2009 (it includes circuitikz) is a good thing.
Here is a quickinstall
http://www.tug.org/texlive/quickinstall.html
where you can read
- 'How to acquire the software'
(http://www.tug.org
peter kint peter_k...@... writes:
- 'Running the installer' or 'GUI installer' and
- 'Post-install: setting the PATH' (it's essential: see 3.4.3/3.4.4 in the
full info page http://www.tug.org/texlive/doc/texlive-en/texlive-en.html)
This sounds like music to me.
I had read the
The directory of the binaries for your platform must be added to
the search path.
Are you a single user? Then you can add the following lines
PATH=/usr/local/texlive/2009/bin/x86_64-linux:$PATH; export PATH
MANPATH=/usr/local/texlive/2009/texmf/doc/man:$MANPATH; export MANPATH
peter kint peter_k...@... writes:
I am about to type i (for installation) and I see in the output the following:
D directories:
TEXDIR (the main TeX directory):
!! default location: /usr/local/texlive/2009
!! is not writable, please select a different one!
Should I first
Sigh,
I'm almost desperate.
I followed all your instructions. He told me that installation was done. I
changed PATHS. And this is what I get:
pe...@peter-desktop:~$ tex --version
TeX 3.141592 (Web2C 7.5.6)
kpathsea version 3.5.6
Copyright 2007 D.E. Knuth.
Kpathsea is copyright 2007 Karl Berry
Am Sonntag 20 Dezember 2009 schrieb peter kint:
Sigh,
I'm almost desperate.
I followed all your instructions. He told me that installation was done. I
changed PATHS. And this is what I get:
pe...@peter-desktop:~$ tex --version
...
Version 2007.
Do I have two versions now and is he
On Sunday 20 December 2009 12:22:13 peter kint wrote:
Sigh,
I'm almost desperate.
I followed all your instructions. He told me that installation was done. I
changed PATHS. And this is what I get:
pe...@peter-desktop:~$ tex --version
TeX 3.141592 (Web2C 7.5.6)
kpathsea version 3.5.6
Steve Litt sl...@... writes:
Anything's possible. Why not investigate, starting with this command at the
command prompt:
locate tex | grep /tex$
Hi, thx for replying. Here are my outputs
Try running each of them, find out which you want, and then strongarm LyX to
specify that one.
Kornel Benko kornel.be...@... writes:
You have to set your PATH appropriatelly.
which tex gives here:
/usr/local/texlive/2009/bin/x86_64-linux/tex
This path has to be _before_ the path of your standard-installed tex (which is
/usr/bin in your case)
which tex gives:
On 12/20/2009 10:31 AM, Ignacio Garcia wrote:
peter kintpeter_k...@... writes:
I am about to type i (for installation) and I see in the output the following:
D directories:
TEXDIR (the main TeX directory):
!! default location: /usr/local/texlive/2009
!! is not writable,
Graphical? Type in terminal:
sudo nautilus
Go to the /usr/local , Create folder and name it texlive
Then do right click on the created and
Properties Permission and change Owner and Group by your user name.
I wouldn't recommend this. Stuff in the /usr/local/ hierarchy isn't
want to figure out where to put this thing. So run locate
/latex.ltx as a way of finding out where your base TeX
installation is. I see:
[rgh...@rghquad tmp]$ locate /latex.ltx
/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx
This tells me that my main TeX tree is at /usr/share
rgheck rgh...@... writes:
Here are the steps to follow.
Richard
Halleluia!
What a massive piece of help (and an instructive tex-course too)!
IT WORKZ! FINALLY!
I owe you eternal gratitude :-)
Can I post your lecture in an other forum too (ubuntuforums.org), evidently with
proper
peter kint peter_k...@... writes:
Kornel Benko kornel.be...@... writes:
You have to set your PATH appropriatelly.
which tex gives here:
/usr/local/texlive/2009/bin/x86_64-linux/tex
This path has to be _before_ the path of your standard-installed
tex (which is
/usr/bin in
On 12/20/2009 03:41 PM, peter kint wrote:
rgheckrgh...@... writes:
Here are the steps to follow.
Richard
Halleluia!
What a massive piece of help (and an instructive tex-course too)!
IT WORKZ! FINALLY!
I owe you eternal gratitude :-)
Can I post your lecture in an
start?
>
> Thx
> Peter
>
Ubuntu 9.10 repository provides texlive-2007 .deb packages. They are old.
Installing the new texlive-2009 (it includes circuitikz) is a good thing.
Here is a quickinstall
http://www.tug.org/texlive/quickinstall.html
where you can read
- 'How to acquire the software
> Ubuntu 9.10 repository provides texlive-2007 .deb packages. They are old.
> Installing the new texlive-2009 (it includes circuitikz) is a good thing.
>
> Here is a quickinstall
> http://www.tug.org/texlive/quickinstall.html
> where you can read
> - 'How to acquire
peter kint writes:
> > - 'Running the installer' or 'GUI installer' and
> > - 'Post-install: setting the PATH' (it's essential: see 3.4.3/3.4.4 in the
> > full info page http://www.tug.org/texlive/doc/texlive-en/texlive-en.html)
> >
> This sounds like music to me.
> I had read
> The directory of the binaries for your platform must be added to
> the search path.
> Are you a single user? Then you can add the following lines
>
> PATH=/usr/local/texlive/2009/bin/x86_64-linux:$PATH; export PATH
> MANPATH=/usr/local/texlive/2009/texmf/doc/man:$MANPATH; export MANPATH
>
peter kint writes:
> I am about to type i (for installation) and I see in the output the following:
>
> directories:
>TEXDIR (the main TeX directory):
> !! default location: /usr/local/texlive/2009
> !! is not writable, please select a different one!
>
> Should I
Sigh,
I'm almost desperate.
I followed all your instructions. He told me that installation was done. I
changed PATHS. And this is what I get:
pe...@peter-desktop:~$ tex --version
TeX 3.141592 (Web2C 7.5.6)
kpathsea version 3.5.6
Copyright 2007 D.E. Knuth.
Kpathsea is copyright 2007 Karl Berry
Am Sonntag 20 Dezember 2009 schrieb peter kint:
> Sigh,
> I'm almost desperate.
>
> I followed all your instructions. He told me that installation was done. I
> changed PATHS. And this is what I get:
>
> pe...@peter-desktop:~$ tex --version
...
> Version 2007.
>
> Do I have two versions now and
On Sunday 20 December 2009 12:22:13 peter kint wrote:
> Sigh,
> I'm almost desperate.
>
> I followed all your instructions. He told me that installation was done. I
> changed PATHS. And this is what I get:
>
> pe...@peter-desktop:~$ tex --version
> TeX 3.141592 (Web2C 7.5.6)
> kpathsea version
Steve Litt writes:
> Anything's possible. Why not investigate, starting with this command at the
> command prompt:
>
> locate tex | grep /tex$
Hi, thx for replying. Here are my outputs
> Try running each of them, find out which you want, and then strongarm LyX to
> specify that
Kornel Benko writes:
> You have to set your PATH appropriatelly.
>
> "which tex" gives here:
> /usr/local/texlive/2009/bin/x86_64-linux/tex
> This path has to be _before_ the path of your standard-installed tex (which is
/usr/bin in your case)
which tex gives:
On 12/20/2009 10:31 AM, Ignacio Garcia wrote:
peter kint writes:
I am about to type i (for installation) and I see in the output the following:
directories:
TEXDIR (the main TeX directory):
!! default location: /usr/local/texlive/2009
!! is not writable,
> > Graphical? Type in terminal:
> > sudo nautilus
> > Go to the /usr/local , Create folder and name it texlive
> > Then do right click on the created and
> > Properties> Permission and change Owner and Group by your user name.
> >
> >
> I wouldn't recommend this. Stuff in the /usr/local/
We now want to figure out where to put this thing. So run "locate
/latex.ltx" as a way of finding out where your base TeX
installation is. I see:
[rgh...@rghquad tmp]$ locate /latex.ltx
/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx
This tells me that my main TeX tree is
rgheck writes:
> Here are the steps to follow.
> Richard
Halleluia!
What a massive piece of help (and an instructive tex-course too)!
IT WORKZ! FINALLY!
I owe you eternal gratitude :-)
Can I post your lecture in an other forum too (ubuntuforums.org), evidently with
proper
peter kint writes:
>
> Kornel Benko writes:
>
> > You have to set your PATH appropriatelly.
> >
> > "which tex" gives here:
> > /usr/local/texlive/2009/bin/x86_64-linux/tex
> > This path has to be _before_ the path of your standard-installed
tex (which
On 12/20/2009 03:41 PM, peter kint wrote:
rgheck writes:
Here are the steps to follow.
Richard
Halleluia!
What a massive piece of help (and an instructive tex-course too)!
IT WORKZ! FINALLY!
I owe you eternal gratitude :-)
Can I post your lecture in
rgheck rgh...@... writes:
On 12/18/2009 06:19 PM, peter kint wrote:
Hi,
1. Trying to install circuitikz
http://home.dei.polimi.it/mredaelli/circuitikz/index.html
to make electrical circuits in Lyx.
I get the error message : ! LaTeX Error: File `circuitikz.sty' not found.
, or is that not necessary?
And if yes: how to clean, where to start?
Thx for reading,
Peter
peter kint wrote:
I dont know if I messed up with Latex... Should I restart from scratch
maybe? And if so: how to clean? how to restart?
Should not be necessary. Assure the file circuitikz.sty is in a directory
where LaTeX can find it (usually a path ending up in
texmf/tex/latex/circuitikz
havent got this command
Maybe I should start from scratch, or is that not necessary?
And if yes: how to clean, where to start?
I am on the same system and using tlmgr. Your desired package is also installed.
You need a good internet connection
1.) Get install-tl-unx.tar.gz ( ~ 1.5MB)
2
Kornel Benko kornel.be...@... writes:
I am on the same system and using tlmgr. Your desired package is also
installed.
You need a good internet connection
1.) Get install-tl-unx.tar.gz ( ~ 1.5MB)
2.) unpack it
3.) create a directory /usr/local/texlive
4.) I for one changed here the
Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@... writes:
Should not be necessary. Assure the file circuitikz.sty is in a directory
where LaTeX can find it (usually a path ending up in
texmf/tex/latex/circuitikz/circuitikz.sty) and then run texhash in a
console.
If kpsewhich circuitikz.sty returns
Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@... writes:
Should not be necessary. Assure the file circuitikz.sty is in a directory
where LaTeX can find it (usually a path ending up in
texmf/tex/latex/circuitikz/circuitikz.sty) and then run texhash in a
console.
If kpsewhich circuitikz.sty returns
peter kint wrote:
This is what he says:
pe...@peter-desktop:~$ kpsewhich circuitikz.sty
pe...@peter-desktop:~$
Apparently, he doesn't find it?
Correct. Now where did you put it?
Jürgen
301 - 400 of 1106 matches
Mail list logo