Le 17 juil. 08 à 20:59, Paul A. Rubin a écrit :
Turns out I was wrong. If you turn off AMS loading but then use an
AMS symbol in a formula somewhere (such as \mathbb{R}), LyX spots
this and automatically loads the amssymb and amsfonts packages,
which are incompatible with lucimatx. The
Le 17 juil. 08 à 20:59, Paul A. Rubin a écrit :
Turns out I was wrong. If you turn off AMS loading but then use an
AMS symbol in a formula somewhere (such as \mathbb{R}), LyX spots
this and automatically loads the amssymb and amsfonts packages,
which are incompatible with lucimatx. The
Le 17 juil. 08 à 20:59, Paul A. Rubin a écrit :
Turns out I was wrong. If you turn off AMS loading but then use an
AMS symbol in a formula somewhere (such as \mathbb{R}), LyX spots
this and automatically loads the amssymb and amsfonts packages,
which are incompatible with lucimatx. The
Or adding optional support for lucimatx package, if more people use this
font package. Selecting this autommatically should automatically disable
amsymb. But I am speculating now.
M.
2008/7/17 Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Ivan Werning wrote:
I would like to compile
On 18.07.08, Manveru wrote:
Or adding optional support for lucimatx package, if more people use this
font package. Selecting this autommatically should automatically disable
amsymb. But I am speculating now.
I do not think that it is necessary to have a lucimatx checkbox in the
Math dialogue.
G. Milde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe we need ProvidesAmsSymbols and ProvidesAmsFonts layout parameters
alongside the already existing ProvidesAmsmath.
The syntax is now Provides foo for package foo, so it may already
work.
JMarc
On Jul 18, 2008, at 6:03 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
The syntax is now Provides foo for package foo, so it may already
work.
JMarc
I'd like to try it. How can I change this parameter? Or are you
talking about development options, not a current workaround?
-Ivan
Ivan Werning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to try it. How can I change this parameter? Or are you
talking about development options, not a current workaround?
This
Provides mypackage 1
syntax exists in 1.5.x and is documented in the Customization manual.
However, the definition of a
Or adding optional support for lucimatx package, if more people use this
font package. Selecting this autommatically should automatically disable
amsymb. But I am speculating now.
M.
2008/7/17 Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Ivan Werning wrote:
I would like to compile
On 18.07.08, Manveru wrote:
Or adding optional support for lucimatx package, if more people use this
font package. Selecting this autommatically should automatically disable
amsymb. But I am speculating now.
I do not think that it is necessary to have a lucimatx checkbox in the
Math dialogue.
G. Milde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe we need ProvidesAmsSymbols and ProvidesAmsFonts layout parameters
alongside the already existing ProvidesAmsmath.
The syntax is now Provides foo for package foo, so it may already
work.
JMarc
On Jul 18, 2008, at 6:03 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
The syntax is now Provides foo for package foo, so it may already
work.
JMarc
I'd like to try it. How can I change this parameter? Or are you
talking about development options, not a current workaround?
-Ivan
Ivan Werning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to try it. How can I change this parameter? Or are you
talking about development options, not a current workaround?
This
Provides mypackage 1
syntax exists in 1.5.x and is documented in the Customization manual.
However, the definition of a
Or adding optional support for lucimatx package, if more people use this
font package. Selecting this autommatically should automatically disable
amsymb. But I am speculating now.
M.
2008/7/17 Paul A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Paul A. Rubin wrote:
>
>> Ivan Werning wrote:
>>
>>> I would like
On 18.07.08, Manveru wrote:
> Or adding optional support for lucimatx package, if more people use this
> font package. Selecting this autommatically should automatically disable
> amsymb. But I am speculating now.
I do not think that it is necessary to have a lucimatx checkbox in the
Math
"G. Milde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe we need ProvidesAmsSymbols and ProvidesAmsFonts layout parameters
> alongside the already existing ProvidesAmsmath.
The syntax is now "Provides foo" for package foo, so it may already
work.
JMarc
On Jul 18, 2008, at 6:03 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
The syntax is now "Provides foo" for package foo, so it may already
work.
JMarc
I'd like to try it. How can I change this parameter? Or are you
talking about development options, not a current workaround?
-Ivan
Ivan Werning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to try it. How can I change this parameter? Or are you
> talking about development options, not a current workaround?
This
Provides mypackage 1
syntax exists in 1.5.x and is documented in the Customization manual.
However, the definition of
Ivan Werning wrote:
I would like to compile my lyx document without amsymb and amsfonts
package (but I do want the amsmath) loaded automatically because I would
like to add another font package, lucimatx, that defines substitutes for
it and dos things differently. see explanation here
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Ivan Werning wrote:
I would like to compile my lyx document without amsymb and amsfonts
package (but I do want the amsmath) loaded automatically because I
would like to add another font package, lucimatx, that defines
substitutes for it and dos things differently. see
Ivan Werning wrote:
I would like to compile my lyx document without amsymb and amsfonts
package (but I do want the amsmath) loaded automatically because I would
like to add another font package, lucimatx, that defines substitutes for
it and dos things differently. see explanation here
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Ivan Werning wrote:
I would like to compile my lyx document without amsymb and amsfonts
package (but I do want the amsmath) loaded automatically because I
would like to add another font package, lucimatx, that defines
substitutes for it and dos things differently. see
Ivan Werning wrote:
I would like to compile my lyx document without amsymb and amsfonts
package (but I do want the amsmath) loaded automatically because I would
like to add another font package, lucimatx, that defines substitutes for
it and dos things differently. see explanation here
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Ivan Werning wrote:
I would like to compile my lyx document without amsymb and amsfonts
package (but I do want the amsmath) loaded automatically because I
would like to add another font package, lucimatx, that defines
substitutes for it and dos things differently. see
I would like to compile my lyx document without amsymb and amsfonts
package (but I do want the amsmath) loaded automatically because I
would like to add another font package, lucimatx, that defines
substitutes for it and dos things differently. see explanation here
I would like to compile my lyx document without amsymb and amsfonts
package (but I do want the amsmath) loaded automatically because I
would like to add another font package, lucimatx, that defines
substitutes for it and dos things differently. see explanation here
I would like to compile my lyx document without amsymb and amsfonts
package (but I do want the amsmath) loaded automatically because I
would like to add another font package, lucimatx, that defines
substitutes for it and dos things differently. see explanation here
27 matches
Mail list logo
