On 5/24/19 1:04 AM, Anthony wrote:
I am trying to show my students the idea of reducing (cancelling)
fractions.
I know of the package named cancel, and this works in ERT mode.
I really don’t want to use ERT if I can help it.
Of course, I would like it to work in the maths-display mode
I am trying to show my students the idea of reducing (cancelling) fractions.
I know of the package named cancel, and this works in ERT mode.
I really don’t want to use ERT if I can help it.
Of course, I would like it to work in the maths-display mode.
Kind Regards,
Anthony
Sent from Mail
Why using Scientific Workpalce by display button I can get qet a code
\begin{equation*}x+y=z\end{equation*} but in LyX it goes like this:
\[x+y=z\]And LyX seems not to recognize equation*.
Is there a possibility of getting a code $$x+y=z$$ using a button to
display and writing inside x+y=z without
On 08/08/2009 12:57 PM, m.kocin...@mini.pw.edu.pl wrote:
Why using Scientific Workpalce by display button I can get qet a code
\begin{equation*}x+y=z\end{equation*} but in LyX it goes like this:
\[x+y=z\]And LyX seems not to recognize equation*.
Is there a possibility of getting a code $$x+y=z$$
Why using Scientific Workpalce by display button I can get qet a code
\begin{equation*}x+y=z\end{equation*} but in LyX it goes like this:
\[x+y=z\]And LyX seems not to recognize equation*.
Is there a possibility of getting a code $$x+y=z$$ using a button to
display and writing inside x+y=z without
On 08/08/2009 12:57 PM, m.kocin...@mini.pw.edu.pl wrote:
Why using Scientific Workpalce by display button I can get qet a code
\begin{equation*}x+y=z\end{equation*} but in LyX it goes like this:
\[x+y=z\]And LyX seems not to recognize equation*.
Is there a possibility of getting a code $$x+y=z$$
Why using Scientific Workpalce by "display" button I can get qet a code
"\begin{equation*}x+y=z\end{equation*}" but in LyX it goes like this:
"\[x+y=z\]"And LyX seems not to recognize "equation*".
Is there a possibility of getting a code "$$x+y=z$$" using a button to
display and writing inside
On 08/08/2009 12:57 PM, m.kocin...@mini.pw.edu.pl wrote:
Why using Scientific Workpalce by "display" button I can get qet a code
"\begin{equation*}x+y=z\end{equation*}" but in LyX it goes like this:
"\[x+y=z\]"And LyX seems not to recognize "equation*".
Is there a possibility of getting a code
line centered and the third line right-justified.
Here's what I'm entering:
A \subseteq B
x \notin B
\therefore x \notin A
I'd greatly appreciate a pointer for the proper format to use in display
mode.
TIA,
Rich
--
Dr. Richard B. Shepard, President
Applied
On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, Rich Shepard wrote:
Here's what I'm entering:
A \subseteq B
x \notin B
\therefore x \notin A
I _think_ I have it now, thanks to Herbert's math mode book. But, I want
to confirm that the \eqnarray environment is what I want. BTW, the SBB[1] is
what
Rich Shepard wrote:
I have a three-line set-theoretical definition of
modus tollens that I want centered on the line, each aligned below the one
above. The AMS-multiline produced the first line left-justified, the second
line centered and the third line right-justified.
Here's what I'm
line centered and the third line right-justified.
Here's what I'm entering:
A \subseteq B
x \notin B
\therefore x \notin A
I'd greatly appreciate a pointer for the proper format to use in display
mode.
TIA,
Rich
--
Dr. Richard B. Shepard, President
Applied
On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, Rich Shepard wrote:
Here's what I'm entering:
A \subseteq B
x \notin B
\therefore x \notin A
I _think_ I have it now, thanks to Herbert's math mode book. But, I want
to confirm that the \eqnarray environment is what I want. BTW, the SBB[1] is
what
Rich Shepard wrote:
I have a three-line set-theoretical definition of
modus tollens that I want centered on the line, each aligned below the one
above. The AMS-multiline produced the first line left-justified, the second
line centered and the third line right-justified.
Here's what I'm
tified, the second
line centered and the third line right-justified.
Here's what I'm entering:
A \subseteq B
x \notin B
\therefore x \notin A
I'd greatly appreciate a pointer for the proper format to use in display
mode.
TIA,
Rich
--
Dr. Richard B. Shepard, President
A
On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, Rich Shepard wrote:
> Here's what I'm entering:
>
> A \subseteq B
> x \notin B
> \therefore x \notin A
I _think_ I have it now, thanks to Herbert's math mode book. But, I want
to confirm that the \eqnarray environment is what I want. BTW, the SBB[1] is
Rich Shepard wrote:
I have a three-line set-theoretical definition of
modus tollens that I want centered on the line, each aligned below the one
above. The AMS-multiline produced the first line left-justified, the second
line centered and the third line right-justified.
Here's what I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nirmal Govind wrote:
Matej: any reason why the start of your signature has an extra
- instead of the standard -- that'll remove the signature
when replying?
Is this is a typo (for lack of a better word at the moment
:-))?
Sorry for bothering
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matej Cepl wrote:
Nirmal Govind wrote:
Matej: any reason why the start of your signature has an extra
- instead of the standard -- that'll remove the signature
when replying?
Is this is a typo (for lack of a better word at the moment
:-))?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nirmal Govind wrote:
Matej: any reason why the start of your signature has an extra
- instead of the standard -- that'll remove the signature
when replying?
Is this is a typo (for lack of a better word at the moment
:-))?
Sorry for bothering
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matej Cepl wrote:
Nirmal Govind wrote:
Matej: any reason why the start of your signature has an extra
- instead of the standard -- that'll remove the signature
when replying?
Is this is a typo (for lack of a better word at the moment
:-))?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nirmal Govind wrote:
> Matej: any reason why the start of your signature has an extra
> "-" instead of the standard "--" that'll remove the signature
> when replying?
> Is this is a typo (for lack of a better word at the moment
> :-))?
Sorry for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matej Cepl wrote:
> Nirmal Govind wrote:
>> Matej: any reason why the start of your signature has an extra
>> "-" instead of the standard "--" that'll remove the signature
>> when replying?
>> Is this is a typo (for lack of a better word at the moment
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 08:26:13PM +0100, Kim Roland Rasmussen wrote:
Hi!
Is there any way I can set the default display mode of an ERT inset
to 'inline' instead of 'open'?
Search replace with a regular text editor in the .lyx file?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom
Is there any way I can set the default display mode of an ERT inset
to 'inline' instead of 'open'?
Search replace with a regular text editor in the .lyx file?
Sounds like what Kim is asking for is a new feature (since search
replace is an offline workaround)... does such a feature request
Rich == Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rich I've run into this same time-consuming operation after I run
Rich the spelling checker on the file. That opens all the ERT boxes,
Rich but doesn't close them afterwards. It would be nice to add
Rich closing to the process.
This will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nirmal Govind wrote:
Sounds like what Kim is asking for is a new feature (since
search replace is an offline workaround)... does such a
feature request already exist? If not, you may want to file
one, Kim.
Well, the strange thing is that this
_new_ thing. Close all floats/Open all floats commands were
available in older versions of LyX. Then the developers thought
Now I know why I was getting a dejavu kind of feeling as I typed that
post yesterday.. I thought it may have been in a cvs version I used
before and so I checked the cvs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nirmal Govind wrote:
_new_ thing. Close all floats/Open all floats commands were
available in older versions of LyX. Then the developers
thought
Now I know why I was getting a dejavu kind of feeling as I
typed that post yesterday.. I thought
What I meant were *really old* versions like 1.1.4 or so.
Yeah, that sounds about right cos I started using lyx around then if I'm
not mistaken...
- --
Matej Cepl,
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02143, (617) 623-1488
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 08:26:13PM +0100, Kim Roland Rasmussen wrote:
Hi!
Is there any way I can set the default display mode of an ERT inset
to 'inline' instead of 'open'?
Search replace with a regular text editor in the .lyx file?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom
Is there any way I can set the default display mode of an ERT inset
to 'inline' instead of 'open'?
Search replace with a regular text editor in the .lyx file?
Sounds like what Kim is asking for is a new feature (since search
replace is an offline workaround)... does such a feature request
Rich == Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rich I've run into this same time-consuming operation after I run
Rich the spelling checker on the file. That opens all the ERT boxes,
Rich but doesn't close them afterwards. It would be nice to add
Rich closing to the process.
This will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nirmal Govind wrote:
Sounds like what Kim is asking for is a new feature (since
search replace is an offline workaround)... does such a
feature request already exist? If not, you may want to file
one, Kim.
Well, the strange thing is that this
_new_ thing. Close all floats/Open all floats commands were
available in older versions of LyX. Then the developers thought
Now I know why I was getting a dejavu kind of feeling as I typed that
post yesterday.. I thought it may have been in a cvs version I used
before and so I checked the cvs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nirmal Govind wrote:
_new_ thing. Close all floats/Open all floats commands were
available in older versions of LyX. Then the developers
thought
Now I know why I was getting a dejavu kind of feeling as I
typed that post yesterday.. I thought
What I meant were *really old* versions like 1.1.4 or so.
Yeah, that sounds about right cos I started using lyx around then if I'm
not mistaken...
- --
Matej Cepl,
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02143, (617) 623-1488
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 08:26:13PM +0100, Kim Roland Rasmussen wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Is there any way I can set the default display mode of an ERT inset
> to 'inline' instead of 'open'?
Search & replace with a regular text editor in the .lyx file?
Andre'
--
Those who desire
Is there any way I can set the default display mode of an ERT inset
to 'inline' instead of 'open'?
Search & replace with a regular text editor in the .lyx file?
Sounds like what Kim is asking for is a new feature (since search &
replace is an offline workaround)... does such a feature
> "Rich" == Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rich> I've run into this same time-consuming operation after I run
Rich> the spelling checker on the file. That opens all the ERT boxes,
Rich> but doesn't close them afterwards. It would be nice to add
Rich> closing to the process.
This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nirmal Govind wrote:
> Sounds like what Kim is asking for is a new feature (since
> search & replace is an offline workaround)... does such a
> feature request already exist? If not, you may want to file
> one, Kim.
Well, the strange thing is that
_new_ thing. Close all floats/Open all floats commands were
available in older versions of LyX. Then the developers thought
Now I know why I was getting a dejavu kind of feeling as I typed that
post yesterday.. I thought it may have been in a cvs version I used
before and so I checked the cvs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nirmal Govind wrote:
>> _new_ thing. Close all floats/Open all floats commands were
>> available in older versions of LyX. Then the developers
>> thought
>
> Now I know why I was getting a dejavu kind of feeling as I
> typed that post yesterday.. I
> What I meant were *really old* versions like 1.1.4 or so.
Yeah, that sounds about right cos I started using lyx around then if I'm
not mistaken...
> - --
> Matej Cepl,
> GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
> 138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02143, (617)
Hi!
Is there any way I can set the default display mode of an ERT inset to 'inline'
instead of 'open'?
I have a LaTeX heavy document and it's becoming quite a pain to change every
inset.
Thanks,
Kim
!
Is there any way I can set the default display mode of an ERT inset to 'inline'
instead of 'open'?
I have a LaTeX heavy document and it's becoming quite a pain to change every
inset.
Thanks,
Kim
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Paul Medwell wrote:
One solution may be to open your file in Emacs, and do a
search-and-replace for:
\begin_inset ERT
status Open
and replace with;
\begin_inset ERT
status Collapsed
I've run into this same time-consuming operation after I run the spelling
checker
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Paul Medwell wrote:
One solution may be to open your file in Emacs, and do a
search-and-replace for:
Yes, but that won't help me during the editing.
My question was more along the lines of whether or not there exists some
configuration setting such that insertion of a new
Hi!
Is there any way I can set the default display mode of an ERT inset to 'inline'
instead of 'open'?
I have a LaTeX heavy document and it's becoming quite a pain to change every
inset.
Thanks,
Kim
!
Is there any way I can set the default display mode of an ERT inset to 'inline'
instead of 'open'?
I have a LaTeX heavy document and it's becoming quite a pain to change every
inset.
Thanks,
Kim
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Paul Medwell wrote:
One solution may be to open your file in Emacs, and do a
search-and-replace for:
\begin_inset ERT
status Open
and replace with;
\begin_inset ERT
status Collapsed
I've run into this same time-consuming operation after I run the spelling
checker
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Paul Medwell wrote:
One solution may be to open your file in Emacs, and do a
search-and-replace for:
Yes, but that won't help me during the editing.
My question was more along the lines of whether or not there exists some
configuration setting such that insertion of a new
Hi!
Is there any way I can set the default display mode of an ERT inset to 'inline'
instead of 'open'?
I have a LaTeX heavy document and it's becoming quite a pain to change every
inset.
Thanks,
Kim
!
Is there any way I can set the default display mode of an ERT inset to 'inline'
instead of 'open'?
I have a LaTeX heavy document and it's becoming quite a pain to change every
inset.
Thanks,
Kim
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Paul Medwell wrote:
> One solution may be to open your file in Emacs, and do a
> search-and-replace for:
>
> \begin_inset ERT
> status Open
>
> and replace with;
>
> \begin_inset ERT
> status Collapsed
I've run into this same time-consuming operation after I run the
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Paul Medwell wrote:
> One solution may be to open your file in Emacs, and do a
> search-and-replace for:
Yes, but that won't help me during the editing.
My question was more along the lines of whether or not there exists some
configuration setting such that insertion of a
On 23-Apr-99 Eric Dorland wrote:
Hi,
Is there an easy way to get a little bit of text (like "Therefore:") on the
same line as an equation in display mode, like they do in many math text
books.
Eric Dorland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just type M-m m !! IN MATH-MODE !!
Hello again,
Is there an easy way to get a little bit of text (like "Therefore:") on the
same line as an equation in display mode, like they do in many math text
M-m d M-m m Therefore: M-m m x-y 0 M-m m and M-m m yx M-m m.cr
Etienne
On 23-Apr-99 Eric Dorland wrote:
Hi,
Is there an easy way to get a little bit of text (like "Therefore:") on the
same line as an equation in display mode, like they do in many math text
books.
Eric Dorland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just type M-m m !! IN MATH-MODE !!
Hello again,
Is there an easy way to get a little bit of text (like "Therefore:") on the
same line as an equation in display mode, like they do in many math text
M-m d M-m m Therefore: M-m m x-y 0 M-m m and M-m m yx M-m m.cr
Etienne
On 23-Apr-99 Eric Dorland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there an easy way to get a little bit of text (like "Therefore:") on the
> same line as an equation in display mode, like they do in many math text
> books.
>
> Eric Dorland
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello again,
> Is there an easy way to get a little bit of text (like "Therefore:") on the
> same line as an equation in display mode, like they do in many math text
M-m d M-m m Therefore: M-m m x-y < 0 M-m m and M-m m y>x M-m m.
Etienne
Hi,
Is there an easy way to get a little bit of text (like "Therefore:") on the
same line as an equation in display mode, like they do in many math text
books.
Eric Dorland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Is there an easy way to get a little bit of text (like "Therefore:") on the
same line as an equation in display mode, like they do in many math text
books.
Eric Dorland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Is there an easy way to get a little bit of text (like "Therefore:") on the
same line as an equation in display mode, like they do in many math text
books.
Eric Dorland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
65 matches
Mail list logo
